Alternative media and normative theory: A case study of Ferguson, Missouri
Abstract
This paper, based on in-depth interviews with journalists at alternative and advocacy papers in St. Louis as well as interviews with live streaming protestors, a new breed of citizen journalist, applies six characteristics commonly associated with the alternative press to coverage of the protests and police crackdown in Ferguson, Missouri between August 9, 2014 and March 2015. Journalists from the alternative newspaper in St. Louis focused on progressive or radical values less than the literature predicted. The African-American newspaper in St. Louis found itself influencing the national and global agenda regarding Ferguson and the ongoing oppression of blacks in the city and surrounding municipalities. Mobile media savvy protestors broadcast police actions from the front lines of dissent in nearly constant live streams day after day from August to November, altering the scope of counternarrative and providing distilled counter-propaganda. In this study, researchers provide a snapshot of the alternative/advocacy press as it rose to fill in gaps in coverage and to find untold stories in one of the most widely broadcast events of 2014.
References
Armstrong, D. (1981). A Trumpet to Arms: Alternative Media in America. Boston: South End Press.
Atton, C. (2002). News Cultures and New Social Movements: Radical Journalism and the Mainstream Media. Journalism Studies, 3(4): 491–505.
Atton, C. & Hamilton, J.F. (2008). Alternative Journalism. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Baldasty, G. J. (1992). The Commercialization of News in the Nineteenth Century. Madison, Wi.: University of Wisconsin Press.
Berger, A. A. (1998). Media Research Techniques. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Carpentier, N. (2009). Developing Democratic and Negotiated Quality: Re-articulating Discourses of Quality Through Democratic and Participatory Media Practices. CM: Časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem : Communication Management Quarterly, 13: 5–41.
Christians, C. G., Glasser, T. L., McQuail, D., Nordenstreng, K. & White, R. A. (2009). Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana, Il.: University of Illinois Press.
Couldry, N. & Curran, J. (eds.). (2003) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
Creswell, J. (2006). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Ferguson Timeline. (2014, December 28). The St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved from http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/ferguson-timeline/article_c8c088c5-1bad-5d51-a0a6-e14a36ebc72f.html.
Fontana, A. & Prokos, A. H. (2007). The Interview: From Formal to Postmodern. Walnut Creek, Ca.: Left Coast Press.
Gans, H. (2005). Deciding What’s News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Herman, E. S. & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.
Keane, J. (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon & Schuster.
Keane, J. (2013). Democracy and Media Decadence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kessler, L. (1984). The Dissident Press: Alternative Journalism in American History. Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications.
Lewes, J. (2000). The Underground Press in America (1964–1968): Outlining an Alternative, the Envisioning of an Underground. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 24(4): 379–400.
McAuliffe, K. (1978). The Great American Newspaper. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Champaign, Il.: University of Illinois Press.
McCracken, G. D. (1988). The Long Interview. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage Publications.
McMillian, J. C. (2011). Smoking Typewriters: The Sixties Underground Press and the Rise of Alternative Media in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mindich, D. T. Z. (1998). Just the Facts: How ‘Objectivity’ Came to Define American Journalism. New York: New York University Press.
Ostertag, B. (2006). People’s Movements, People’s Press: The Journalism of Social Justice Movements. Boston: Beacon Press.
Pasley, J. L. (2001). ‘The Tyranny of Printers’: Newspaper Politics in the Early American Republic. Charlottesville, Va.: University of Virginia Press.
Peck, A. (1998). From underground to alternative: Peace signs and dollar signs (Journalism in 1968 and 1998). Media Studies Journal, 12(3): 156–162.
Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.
Starr, P. (2004). The Creation of the Media: Political Origins of Modern Communications. New York: Basic Books.
Streitmatter, R. (2001). Voices of Revolution: The Dissident Press in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
Copyright
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
Licensing
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in CM: Communication and Media and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Self-archiving policy
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in the published works do not express the views of the Editors and the Editorial Staff. The authors take legal and moral responsibility for the ideas expressed in the articles. Publisher shall have no liability in the event of issuance of any claims for damages. The Publisher will not be held legally responsible should there be any claims for compensation.