Framing the Mobile Phone: The Psychopathologies of an Everyday Object
Sažetak
This article proposes that the affective processes that shape our relationship to the world of digital consumption and communication can be illuminated further when viewed through a lens of object relations psychoanalysis. We focus on the use of the mobile phone as both an object in the world and of the psyche in order to reflect upon its uses as an evocative object that shapes the psychosocial boundaries of experience in everyday life. We argue that in contrast to the concepts of interpersonal communication that can be found in some domains of popular culture and in communication studies, object relations psychoanalysis can be usefully deployed in order to explore the unconscious attachments that develop in relation to consumer objects, allowing for the complexity of feeling and reflection that may emerge in relation to them and the potential spaces of the mind. The mobile phone’s routine uses and characteristics are widely understood. At the same time, the mobile phone invites critical reflections that identify a paradoxical object of both creative and pathological use. Such reflexivity includes the mobile’s relationship to the complexity of psychosocial experience within the contemporary cultural moment. Applying the ideas of psychoanalysts Donald Winnicott, Thomas Ogden and Christopher Bollas, we argue that one explanation for why the mobile phone continues to attract not only enthusiastic cultural commentary but also a degree of apprehension across academic and popular-discursive settings can be found in its capacity to both disrupt and connect as an object of attachment and as a means of unconscious escape.
Reference
Abraham, A. T., Pocheptsova, A. & Ferraro, R. (2012). The Effect of Mobile Phone Use on Prosocial Behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Maryland.
Abrahams, R. (2014). The Two-phone Solution Doubles the Pain, Not the Pleasure. Huffington Post, 3 April 2014. Accessed 30. 09. 2016. URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rebecca-abrahams/the-two-phone-solution-do_b_5085527.html.
Agar, J. (2004). Constant Touch: A Global History of the Mobile Phone. Cambridge: Icon Books.
Alleyne, R. (2012). Mobile Phone Addiction Ruining Relationships. The Telegraph, 30 November 2012. Accessed 16. 11. 2016. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/9714616/Mobile-phone-addiction-ruining-relationships.html.
Bainbridge, C. & Yates, C. (2012). Introduction to Special Issue on Media and the Inner World: New Perspectives on Psychoanalysis and Popular Culture. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society, 17(2): 113–119.
Bainbridge, C. & Yates, C. (2014). Introduction: Psycho-cultural Approaches to Emotion, Media and Popular Culture. In Bainbridge, C. & Yates, C. (eds.), Media and the Inner World, Psycho-Cultural Approaches to Emotion, Media and Popular Culture (pp. 1–19). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Balick, A. (2016). Checking Your Smartphone Again? It’s an Object of Emotional Supply. Dr Aaron Balick Website. Accessed 16. 12. 2016. URL: http://www.aaronbalick.com/blog/checking-your-smartphone-again-its-an-object-of-emotional-supply/.
Balick, A. (2013). The Psychodynamics of Social Networking. London: Karnac Books.
Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society; Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Bingham, J. (2012). Mobile Addict Parents Guilty of Child ‘Neglect’ Warns Psychologist. The Telegraph, 22 May 2012. Accessed 13. 06. 2016. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/9280194/Mobile-addict-parents-guilty-of-child-neglect-warns-psychologist.html.
Bollas, C. (2009). The Evocative Object World. London: Routledge.
Bowlby, J. (2008) Attachment and Loss: Separation: Anxiety and Anger. London: Basic Books.
Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1): 238–266.
Clark, A. (2015). ‘Mobile Phones have Changed the World for Better or Worse’, The Guardian 3 January, Accessed 02. 01. 2017. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jan/03/mobile-phones-have-changed-world-for-better-or-worse.
Daily Mail Reporter (2009). How Women Love Their Mobile Phones… More than Their Boyfriends. Daily Mail On Line, 20 December 2012. Accessed 02. 01. 2017. URL: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1239182/How-women-love-mobile-phones--boyfriends.html.
Davidson, M. (2013). It’s Time to Switch off Your Mobile and Set Yourself Free. The Telegraph, 28 January 2013. Accessed 31. 12. 2016. URL: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/9831913/Its-time-to-switch-off-your-mobile-and-set-yourself-free.html.
Díaz, L. & Ekman, U. (2011). Introduction to Mobile Ubiquity in Public and Private Spaces. Digital Creativity, 22 (3): 127–133.
Drouin, M. & Landgraff, C. (2012). Texting, Sexting and Attachment in College Students Romantic Relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (2): 444–449.
Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Koed Madsen, S., Mackay, H. & Negus, K. (2013). Doing Cultural Studies: The Story of the Sony Walkman (revised edition). Milton Keynes: Sage Books.
Eco, U. (2014). Foreword - Truth and the Mobile Phone. In Ferraris, M. & De Sanctis, S. (trans.) Where Are You? An Ontology of the Cell Phone. New York: Fordham UP.
Elliot, A. & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile Lives. London: Routledge.
Elliott, A. (1996). Subject to Ourselves: Social Theory, Psychoanalysis and Postmodernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism. London: Zero Books.
Fisher, M. (2014). Ghosts of my Life: Writings on Depression, Haunting and Lost Futures. New York: Zero Books.
Fortunati, L. & Taipale, S. (2014). The Advanced Use of Mobile Phones in Five European Countries. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(2): 317–337.
Fortunati, L. (2002). The Mobile Phone: Towards New Categories and Social Relations. Information, Communication & Society, 5(4): 513–528.
Garber, M. (2012). Just Thinking about Your Cell Phone Makes You More Selfish. 21 February 2012. Accessed 14. 11. 2016. URL: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/02/just-thinking-about-your-cell-phone-makes-you-more-selfish/253269/.
Giroux, H. (2015). Selfie Culture at the Intersection of the Corporate and the Surveillance States. Counterpunch, 6 February. Accessed 16. 6. 2016. URL: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/06/selfie-culture-at-the-intersection-of-the-corporate-and-the-surveillance-states/.
Heffernan, M. (2013). Why Putting Down Yourself Will Help Your Business.26 August 2013. Accessed 20. 12. 2016. URL: http://www.inc.com/margaret-heffernan/put-the-cell-phone-away.html.
Hills, M. (2007). Essential Tensions: Winnicottian Object-relations in the Media Sociology of Roger Silverstone. International Journal of Communication, 1(1): 37–48.
Hjorth, L. & Lim, S. S. (2012). Mobile Intimacy in an Age of Affective Mobile Media. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4): 447–484.
Hjorth, L., Burgess, J. & Richardson, I. (2012). Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. New York: Routledge.
Ito, M., Okabe, D. & Anderson, K. (2009). Portable Objects in Three Global Cities: The Personalization of Urban Places. In Ling, R. & Campbell, S. (eds.), The Reconstruction of Space & Time through Mobile Communication Practices (pp. 67–88). New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Johnson, D. (2010). Love: Bondage or Liberation? A Psychological Exploration of the Meaning. London: Karnac Books.
Jouhki, J. (2009). A Modern Fetish: The Value of the Mobile Phone in South Korean Culture. Proceedings of ICT, Society and Human Beings 2009: 121–128.
Kahr, B. (2016). Tea with Winnicott. London: Karnac Books.
Kahr, B. (1996) D. W. Winnicott, A Biographical Portrait. London: Karnac Books.
Kang, H. Y. & Son, C. (2009) Development and Validation of the Mobile Phone Addiction Scale for Adolescents. Korean Journal of Health Psychology, 14(3): 497–510.
Klein, M. (1937/1988). Love Guilt and Reparation. In Klein, M. (ed.), Love, Guilt and Reparation (pp. 306–344). London: Virago Press.
Klein, M. (1946/1988). Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms. In Klein, M. (ed.), Envy and Gratitude and Other Works 1946-1963 (pp. 1–25) London: Virago Press.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual Practice. In Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K. & Von Savigny, E. (eds.), The Practice Turn In Contemporary Theory (pp. 184–198). London: Routledge.
Konrath, S. H., O’Brien, E. H. & Hsing, C. (2016). Changes in Dispositional Empathy in American College Students over Time: A Meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(2): 180–198.
Kullman, K. (2010). Transitional Geographies: Making Mobile Children. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(8): 829–846.
Kuhn, A. (ed.) (2013). Little Madnesses. London: I.B. Taurus.
Kunst, J. (2012). Do You Have a Love/hate Relationship with Your Phone? Psychology Today. Accessed 13. 6. 2016. URL: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/headshrinkers-guide-the-galaxy/201204/do-you-have-lovehate-relationship-your-phone.
Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ling, R. (2007). Children, Youth and Mobile Communication. Journal of Children and Media, 1(13): 60–67.
McLuhan, M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. New York: McGgraw-Hill.
Menzies-Lyth, I. E. P. (ed.) (1988). Containing Anxiety in Institutions: Selected Essays, Volume 1. London: Free Association Books.
Metz, C. (2015). How Amazon, Google, and Facebook will bring down Telcos. WIRED. Accessed 31. 12. 2016. URL: https://www.wired.com/2015/02/googles-android-work-gives-phone-split-personality/.
Music, G. (2014). The Buzz Trap: Speeded-up Lives, Distractedness, Impulsiveness and Decreasing Empathy. Psychodynamic Practice, 20(3): 228–249.
Ogden, T. H. (1992). The Matrix of the Mind: Object Relations and the Psychoanalytic Dialogue. London: Karnac Books.
Ribak, R. (2009). Remote Control, Umbilical Cord and beyond: The Mobile Phone as a Transitional Object. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1): 183–196.
Richards, B. (2007). Emotional Governance: Politics, Media and Terror. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Royal Mail (2008). Lost without Your Mobile? Sounds Like a Case of Nomo-phobia. Accessed 24. 11. 2016. URL: http://www.royalmailgroup.com/cy/lost-without-your-mobile-sounds-case-nomo-phobia.
Richardson, I. (2012). Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication, and the iPhone. New York: Routledge.
Riesman, D. (1950). The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character, by David Riesman. In Collaboration with Reuel Denney and Nathan Glazer. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rodman, F. R. (2005) Preface to the Routledge Classics Edition. In Winnicott, D. W. (ed.), Playing and Reality (p. ix–xv). London: Routledge.
Segal, H. (1957/1990). Dream, Phantasy, and Art. London: Tavistock/Routledge.
Serrano-Puche, J. (2015). Emotions and Digital Technologies, Mapping the Field of Research in Media Studies. Media and LSE Working Paper 33, Accessed 12. 7. 2016. URL: www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/mediaWorkingPapers/pdf/WP33-FINAL.pdf.
Silverstone, R. & Hirsch, E. (eds.) (1992). Consuming Technologies. London: Routledge.
Spelman, M. B. & Thomson-Salo, F. (eds.) (2014). The Winnicott Tradition: Lines of Development—Evolution of Theory and Practice Over the Decades. London: Karnac Books.
Tacchi, J., Kitner, K. R. & Crawford, K. (2012). Meaningful Mobility, Gender, Development and Mobile Phones. Feminist Media Studies, 12(4): 528–537.
Turkle, S. (2011a). Alone Together: Why we Expect More From Technology and Less From Each Other. New York: Basic Books.
Turkle, S. (2011b). Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Whitty, M. T. & Carr, A. N. (2003). Cyberspace as Potential Space: Considering the Web as a Playground to Cyber-flirt. Human Relations, 56(7): 869–891.
Winnicott, D. W. (1958) The Capacity to Be Alone. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 39: 416–420.
Winnicott, D. W. (1963). The Development of the Capacity for Concern. Bull. Menninger Clin., 27: 167–176.
Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Tavistock Publications.
Woodward, I. (2011). Towards and Object Relations Theory of Consumerism: The Aesthetics of Desire and the Unfolding Materiality of Social Life. Journal of Consumer Culture, 11(3): 366–384.
Autori zadržavaju autorska prava nad objavljenim člancima, a izdavaču daju neekskluzivno pravo da članak objavi, da u slučaju daljeg korišćenja članka bude naveden kao njegov prvi izdavač, kao i da distribuira članak u svim oblicima i medijima.
Licenciranje
Objavljeni članci distribuiraju se u skladu sa licencom Creative Commons Autorstvo - Deliti pod istim uslovima 4.0 International (CC BY-SA). Dopušteno je da se delo kopira i distribuira u svim medijima i formatima, da se prerađuje, menja i nadograđuje u bilo koje svrhe, uključujući i komercijalne, pod uslovom da se na pravilan način citiraju njegovi prvobitni autori, postavi link ka originalnoj licenci, naznači da li je delo izmenjeno i da se novo delo objavi pod istom licencom kao i originalno.
Korisnici su pri tome dužni da navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija), kao i njegovu DOI oznaku. U slučaju objavljivanja u elektronskoj formi takođe su dužni da postave HTML link, kako sa originalnim člankom objavljenim u časopisu CM: Communication and Media, tako i sa korišćenom licencom.
Autori mogu da stupaju u zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju rada objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je rad prvobitno objavljen u ovom časopisu.
Politika samoarhiviranja
Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Autori su obavezni da pritom navedu pun bibliografski opis članka objavljenog u ovom časopisu (autori, naslov rada, naslov časopisa, volumen, sveska, paginacija) i postave link, kako na DOI oznaku tog članka, tako i na korišćenu licencu.Autorima je dozvoljeno da objavljenu verziju rada deponuju u institucionalni ili tematski repozitorijum ili da je objave na ličnim veb stranicama (uključujući i profile na društvenim mrežama, kao što su ResearchGate, Academia.edu, itd.), na sajtu institucije u kojoj su zaposleni u bilo koje vreme nakon objavljivanja u časopisu.
Odricanje od odgovornosti
Stavovi izneti u objavljenim radovima ne izražavaju stavove urednika i članova redakcije časopisa. Autori preuzimaju pravnu i moralnu odgovornost za ideje iznete u svojim radovima. Izdavač neće snositi nikakvu odgovornost u slučaju ispostavljanja bilo kakvih zahteva za naknadu štete.