Procena rizika kod adolescentnih seksualnih prestupnika: prikaz slučaja

  • Valentina Šobot Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7018-3944
  • Svetlana Ivanović Kovačević Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za psihijatriju i psihološku medicinu
  • Vladimir Knežević Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za psihijatriju i psihološku medicinu
  • Ana Marija Vejnović Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za psihijatriju i psihološku medicinu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/engrami43-35947
Ključne reči: adolescencija, seksualni prestupi, recidivizam, faktori rizika

Sažetak


Jedan od najznačajnih zadataka stručnjaka iz oblasti mentalnog zdravlja u okviru procene adolescentnih seksualnih prestupnika jeste procena rizika od budućeg deliktnog ponašanja. Na zahtev suda izvršeno je psihijatrijsko i psihološko veštačenje 17-godišnjeg adolescenta okrivljenog za silovanje, sa zadatkom da se utvrdi duševna zrelost maloletnika, rizik od ponavljanja delikata, te potreba za tretmanom. U prikazu slučaja ilustrovana je procena rizika bazirana na pristupu strukturisane profesionalne procene, koji integriše klinička sa empirijskim znanjima, i pokazao se najkorisnijim u proceni rizika od seksualnog recidivizma. Procena se bazirala na integraciji podataka dobijenih primenom strukturisane skale procene Protokol za procenu maloletnih seksualnih prestupnika (Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II; JSOAP-II, Prentky and Righthand, 2003) i podataka baziranih na standardnoj profesionalnoj ekspertizi od strane veštaka. Cilj rada je usmeren na prikazivanje prednosti strukturisanog pristupa proceni rizika kod adolescentnih seksualnih prestupnika, a razmatrane su i praktične implikacije vezane za adekvatno upravljanje slučajem i predloženi tretman.

Biografije autora

Valentina Šobot, Faculty of Medicine Novi Sad

docent

Svetlana Ivanović Kovačević, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za psihijatriju i psihološku medicinu

vanredni profesor 

 

 

Vladimir Knežević, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Medicinski fakultet, Katedra za psihijatriju i psihološku medicinu

vanredni profesor

Reference


  1. Birgden A, Cucolo, H. The treatment of sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. Sep 2011; 23(3):295-313.

  2. Hoberman HA, Jackson RL. (Forensic evaluations of sexual offenders: Principles and practices for almost all sexual offender appraisals. in: Phenix A., Hoberman HA [eds. ] Sexual offending: Predisposing antecedents, assessments and management. Springer. 2019;  353- 95.

  3. Rennison CM. Criminal victimization 2000: Changes 1999-2000 with trends 1993-2000. (Report No. NCJ-187007). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2001. Retrieved on January 3, 2022. https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv00.pdf

  4. Hackett S, Phillips J, Masson H, Balfe M. Individual, family and abuse characteristics of 700 British child and adolescent sexual abusers. Child Abuse Review. 2013;22(4):232-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2246

  5. Prentky R, Harris B, Frizzell K, Righthand, S. An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2000; 12(2):71-93.

  6. Venziano C, Veneziano L. Adolescent sex offenders:A review of literature. Trauma, violence & abuse. 2002; 3(4):247-60.

  7. Sjöstedt G, Långström N. Assessment of risk for criminal recidivism among rapists: A comparison of four different measures. Psychology Crime and Law. 2002; 8(1):25-40

  8. Harris AJR, Hanson, RK. Sex offender recidivism: A simple question 2004-03. Ottowa, Ontario, Canada, Public Safety Canada. 2004.

  9. Caldwell MF. Study characteristics and recidivism base rates in juvenile sex offender recidivism. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010; 54(2):197-212. 

  10. Grotpeter JK, Elliott DS. Violent Sexual Offending. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Institute of Behavioral Science. 2002.

  11. Lobanov-Rostovsky C. Recidivism of juveniles who commit sexual offenses. SMART Office U.S. Department of Justice. 2015 July.  Retrived from: https://www.smart.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh231/files/media/document/juvenilerecidivism.pdf

  12. Chu CM, Thomas SDM. Adolescent sexual offenders: The relationship between typology and recidivism. Sex Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2010; 22:218-33.

  13. Hanson K, Morton-Bourgon, KE. The Accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Public Safety Canada. 2009; 21(1):1-21.

  14. Beech AR, Craig The current status of static and dynamic factors in sexual offender risk assessment. Journal of Aggression and Peace Research. 2012; 4(4):169-85.

  15. Seagrave D, Grisso T. Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior. 2002; 26:219-39.

  16. Worling JR, Curwen T. Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse Negl. 2000 Jul; 24(7):965-82.

  17. Gerhold CK, Browne K,Becket R. Predicting recidivism in adolescent sexual offenders.  Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2007 July;12(4):427-38.

  18. Långström N, Grann Risk for criminal recidivism among young sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2000; 15(8), 855–71.

  19. Långström N, Grann Psychopathy and violent recidivism among young criminal offenders. Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum . 2002 February; 106(412):86-92.

  20. Epperson DL, Ralston CA, Fowers D, DeWitt J, Gore Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool–II. in: Prescott D. [ed.] Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood & Barnes; 2006. p.118-69

  21. Epperson DL, Ralston CA. Development and validation of the Juvenile Sexual Offense Recidivism Risk Assessment Tool–II. Sexual Abuse. 2015; 27:529-

  22. Prentky R, Righthand, S. Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) Manual. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention’s Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse. 2003. NCJ 202316. Retrived from: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/202316.pdf

  23. Worling JR.The estimate of Risk of Adolescent Sexual Offense Recidivism (ERASOR): Preliminary psychometric data. Sexual Abuse. 2004 June, 16(3):235-54.

  24. Risk assessment of youth who engage in sexually abusive behaviours: An overview. SECASA, 1-8. https://casa.org.au/assets/Documents/G8-Risk-assessment-an-overview-v3.pdf

  25. Molnar T, Allard T, Mckillop N, Rynne J. Reliability and predictive validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II in an Australian context . Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Jan; PMID: 3195751doi: 10.1177/0306624X19900978

  26. Wijetunga C, Martinez R, Rosenfeld, B, Cruise, K. The influence of age and sexual drive on the predictive validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-Revised. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Jan; 62(1):150-69.

  27. Barra S, Bessler C, Landolt MA, Aebi M. Testing the validity of criminal risk assessment tools in sexually abusive youth Psychol Assess. 2018 Nov; 30(11):1430-43.

  28. Barroso, R, Pechorro P,  Ramião E,  Figueiredo P,  Manita, C. et al. Are juveniles who have committed sexual offenses the same everywhere? Psychometric properties of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol–II in a Portuguese youth sample. Sexual Abuse. 2019; 1-20.

  29. Substance use and antisocial behaviour in adolescence. 2021 Feb. https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/CLS-briefing-paper-Risky-behaviours-MCS-Age-17-initial-findings.pdf

  30. Međunarodna statistička klasifikacija bolesti i srodnih zdravstvenih problema, Deseta revizija, Knjiga 1. Beograd: Institut za javno zdravlje Srbije Izdanje. 2010.

  31. Huterer N, Antonella Nagy, A. Rizično seksualno ponašanje adolescenata. Didaskalos, 2019; 3(3), 137-50.

  32. Popma A, Raine A.Will future forensic assessment be neurobiologic? Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 2006; 15:429-44.

  33. Cauffman E, & Steinberg L. (Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: Why adolescents may be less culpable than adults. Behavioral Science and the Law, 2000; 18:742-

  34. Barra S, Bessler C, Landolt MA, Aebi M. Patterns of adverse childhood experiences in juveniles who sexually offended. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 2018; 30(7), 803-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063217697135

  35. Yoder JR, Leibowitz JS, Peterson L. Parental and peer attachment characteristics: Differentiating between youth sexual and non-sexual offenders and associations with sexual offense profiles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2018; 33(17), 2643-63.

  36. McCloskey LA, Lichter, EL.The contribution of marital violence to adolescent aggression across different relationships. Journal of  Interpersonal Violence. 2003;18(4),390-412.

  37. Letourneau EJ, Bourdin CM. The effective treatment of juveniles who sexually offend: An ethical imperative. Ethics & Behavior. 2008, 18(2/3):286-306.


 


 

Objavljeno
2022/02/27
Kako citirati
Šobot, V., Ivanović Kovačević, S., Knežević, V., & Vejnović, A. M. (2022). Procena rizika kod adolescentnih seksualnih prestupnika: prikaz slučaja. Engrami, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.5937/engrami43-35947
Broj časopisa
Vol. 43 Br. 2 (2021)
Rubrika
PRIKAZ SLUČAJA