THE IMPORTANCE OF PREHOSPITAL RECOGNITION OF ST SEGMENT ELEVATION IN THE AVR LEAD IN ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME

  • Gordana Todorović GZZHMP Beograd
  • Aleksandar Joldzic Emergency medicine institute Belgrade
  • Dragana Vesic EMS Stara Pazova
Keywords: aVR elevation, atypical ECG, EMS

Abstract


Objective The objective of the article is to present how educated the EMS doctors included in the STEMI network are in recognizing and treating the aVR lead elevation, as an atypical ECG finding.

Case report Three patients with chest pain from 30 minutes to 2.5 hours are presented. The ECG recording  sST depressions >1mm in 6 or more leads (I, II, III, aVL, aVF, V2-V6) coupled with a 3-4mm ST elevation in the aVR lead and similar less pronounced ST elevation in V1. The strategy for primary PCI had been initialized,  after consultation with interventional cardiologists and having taken the initial dose of dual antiplatelet therapy, transported to the hospital catheterization labs.

Conclusion ST segment depression of 1 mm or more in six or more leads (inferolateral depression) coupled with ST segment elevation in aVR and/or V1 points to the three-vessel disease (3VD) or left main coronary artery (LMCA) obstruction. 

References

1. Dastidar A. STEMI Equivalent: Are we missing the STEMIs? BCS Editorial-07 August 2013.
2. Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Barbagelata A, Underwood DA, Gates KB, Topol EJ, et al. Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. The New England journal of medicine. 1996;334(8):481–487. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199602223340801.
3. Rostoff P, Piwowarska W, Gackowski A, Konduracka E, El Massri N, Latacz P, et al. Electrocardiographic prediction of acute left main coronary artery occlusion Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(7):852-585. PMID:17870500. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.01.025.
4. Burns E. LMCA occlusion: ST Elevation in aVR.
5. Life in the fastlane. Last update March 16, 2019. Available from: https://litfl.com/lmca-occlusion-st-elevation-in-avr/. [Accessed 15th June 2015].
6. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. European Heart Journal. 2018; 39(2): 119–177. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
7. Nabati M, Emadi M, Mollaalipour M, Bagheri B, & Nouraei M. ST-segment elevation in lead aVR in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. Acta Cardiologica. 2016; 71(1): 47-54. PMID: 26853253. DOI:10.1080/AC.71.1.3132097.
8. Misumida N, Kobayashi A, Fox JT, Hanon S, Schweitzer P, Kanei Y. Predictive Value of ST-Segment Elevation in Lead aVR for Left Main and/or Three-Vessel Disease in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016;21(1):91-97. PMID: 25884447. doi: 10.1111/anec.12272.
9. Ivanov I, Jarakovic M, Dejanovic J, Petrovic M, Srdanovic I, Obradovic D. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of avr lead inelectrocardiogram. Medicinski časopis. 2014; 48(2): 104-107. doi:10.5937/mckg48-4068.
10. Misumida N, Kobayashi A, Fox JT, Hanon S, Schweitzer P, Kanei Y. Predictive Value of ST-Segment Elevation in Lead aVR for Left Main and/or Three-Vessel Disease in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2016; 21(1): 91-97. DOI:10.1111/anec.12272
Published
2020/04/07
Section
Case report