Priroda korporativnog upravljanja i učinka u uslovima vlasničke koncentracije

  • Božidar S Leković Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Ekonomski fakultet u Subotici
  • Slobodan M Marić Univerzitet u Novom Sadu Ekonomski fakultet Subotica Departman za menadžment
Ključne reči: Transition||, ||Tranzicija, Performance||, ||Učinak, Ownership Concentration||, ||Vlasnička koncentracija, Corporate governance||, ||Korporativno upravljanje,

Sažetak


Centralno istraživačko pitanje i svrha rada usmerena je na analizu obima koncentracije vlasništva akcionarskog kapitala u Republici Srbiji kao I međuzavisnost stepena koncentracija vlasništva akcionarskog kapitala i korporativnih performansi. U radu se nastoji dati odgovarajući odgovor na pitanje, koliko se postojeća koncentracija vlasništva kapitala promenila u odnosu na prethodni period, odnosno na stepen koncentracije koji je važio na početku procesa tranzicije i privatizacije društvene imovine a koji je poslužio kao osnov formiranja korporativnog sektora. Odgovori na ova pitanja poslužiće da ukažu na prirodu korporativnog sektora u Republici Srbiji, kao i stepen razvoja tržišta hartija od vrednosti. Metode istraživanja podrazumevaju upotrebu parametarskih procedura što nalaže karakteristike odabranih varijbli i broj slučajeva u uzorku. U tom smislu koristiće se univarijantni ANOVA postupci i Pirsonov koeficijent korelacije.Opšti rezultati rada ukazuju da korporativni sektor u Republici Srbiji ostvaruje pozitivne rezultate ali koji nemaju adekvatnu tržišnu verifikaciju u prisustvu ekstremne vlasničke koncentracije i dominantnog uticaja većinskih ili malog broja velikih akcionara. Zahvaljujući privilegovanoj poziciji malog broja povlaštenih akcionara, koja se ostvaruje kao rezultat eksploatacije malih akcionara, pre svega usled nepostojanja ili nedovoljno razvijenog mehanizma pravne i institucionalne zaštite.

Reference

Becht, M., Bolton, P. and A. Röell (2005), Corporate Governance and Control, ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance, European Corporate Governance Institute;

Berle, A. A., & Gardiner, C. (1932), Means. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, 45;

Centar zaliberalno-demokratskestudije (2008), Korporativnoupravljanje: pet godinakasnije – stanje u Srbiji;

CIPE (Center for International Private Enterprise) (2002), Instituting Corporate Governance in Developing, Emerging and Transitional Economies, A Handbook;

Claessens, Stijn, Simeon Djankov, Joseph P.H. Fan, and Larry H.P. Lang (2002), “Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings.” Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771;

Clay, Michael J., and Clifford G. Holderness (1989): “Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 371-395;

Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K., 1985: The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences. The Journal of Political Economy 93(6), 1155–1177;

Dobák, M., & Steger, T. (2003). Corporate Governance in Central and Eastern Europe—An introductory review. Journal for East European Management Studies, 223-235.

Earle, John S., CsabaKucsera, and ÁlmosTelegdy. (2005). “Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance on the Budapest Stock Exchange: Do Too Many Cooks Spoil the Goulash?” Corporate Governance: An International Review 13(2) (March): 254-264;

Florencio López de Silanes, Rafael La Porta, and Andrei Shleifer (1999), “Corporate Ownership Around the World” Journal of Finance 54(2) 471-517

Holderness, Clifford G. (2003), “A Survey of Blockholders and Corporate Control.” FRBNY Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 51-64;

Holderness, Clifford G., and Dennis P. Sheehan (1988), “The Role of Majority Shareholders in Publicly Held Corporations: An Exploratory Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 317-346;

Hovey, Martin, Larry Li, and Tony Naughton (2003), “The Relationship between Valuation and Ownership of Listed Firms in China.” Corporate Governance 11(2), 112-122;

Labus M. (2006), Osnovi ekonomije, the Publishing Centre of the Belgrade Law School;

Labus, M. (2007). Korporativni sektor u Srbiji: Narodni kapitalizam ili tajkunizacija., the Publishing Centre of the Belgrade Law School;

McConnell, John J., and Henri Servaes (1990), “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 595-612;

Milikić, B. B., Janićijević, N., &Cerović, B. (2012). Two decades of post-socialism in Serbia: Lessons learned and emerging issues in human resource management. Journal for East European Management Studies, 445-463.

Miljković, M, Filipović, S., Tanasković, S. (2013) „Market concentration in the banking sector: evidence from Serbia”, Industrija br. 2, Vol 41 Ekonomskiinstitut, Beograd. ISSN 0350-0373, UDK 330.322:628.1(497.11). str. 7-27.

Nikolić, I. & Kovačević, M. (2014), The Impact of Privatization – Empirical Analisys and Results in Serbian Industries, Časopis Industrija, 42(1), 63-86;

Prasnikar, J., Mikerevic, D., &Voje, D. (2014). Blockholding and organisational diversity: the case of a transition economy. Journal for East European Management Studies, 19(3), 277-304.

Prowse, Stephen D. (1992), “The Structure of Corporate Ownership in Japan.” Journal of Finance, Vol. 47(3), 1121-1140;

S. Deakin, R.Hobbs. S. Konzclmann and F. Wilkinson (2001), Partnership. Ownership and Control: The Impact of Corporate Governance on Employment Relations;

Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny (1986), “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control.” Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461-488;

Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert W. Vishny (1997), “A Survey of Corporate Governance.” Journal of Finance, 52, 737-783;

Steger, T., &Hartz, R. (2005). On the way to “good” corporate governance? A critical review of the German debate. Corporate Ownership and Control, 3(1), 9-16.

Objavljeno
2016/05/17
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak