Non-diaphragm electrodeposition of antimony: Effect of process parameters and precipitating agents

  • mehmet hakan morcali Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
  • Ozgun Kucukoglu
  • Burcu Nilgun Cetiner
  • Serdar Aktas
Keywords: Antimony, Electrochemical process; Metallic salts; Precipitation

Abstract


Metallic antimony production from antimony-bearing materials is a research hotspot. The conventional electrowinning technology of antimony is a challenging problem due to the sulfur compounds that come from both the ore itself and the leaching solution in the electrolysis system. The electro-production of antimony in modified non-diaphragm cells is of interest because of the high price and maintenance issues associated with diaphragm cells.

 

A sulfur-based problem in non-diaphragm cells was the focus of this study, which investigated the effects of various salts on this problem and also optimized antimony production conditions. Various salts (i.e., BaCl2, CaCl2, Ba(OH)2, Ca(OH)2) were used as a precipitating agent for the formation of insoluble salts (BaSO4/CaSO4 and BaSO3/CaSO3). Sb concentration, amount of NaOH and Na2S in the bath, electrowinning time, and temperature were investigated to optimize reaction parameters. The Taguchi experimental design was used to determine the effect of each factor on the Sb deposition. The phases and structures formed during electroproduction were identified with the help of various measurement techniques This study found that in the presence of 96 mM BaCl2, 45 g/L of Sb concentration, 100 g/L of NaOH, and 60 g/L of Na2S were the most suitable factors. It was found that 40 oC was the optimal electrowinning temperature. This result also demonstrated that increasing concentrations of BaCl2 reduced specific energy consumption.

References


  1. EU_CRM_Report. Study on the EU's list of Critical Raw Materials. 2021 [cited 2021 01 October]; Available from: https://rmis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/CRM_2020_Report_Final.pdf.

  2. C. G. Anderson, The metallurgy of antimony, Geochemistry, 72 (2012) 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2012.04.001.

  3. D. Dupont, S. Arnout, P. T. Jones and K. Binnemans, Antimony Recovery from End-of-Life Products and Industrial Process Residues: A Critical Review, Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 2 (1) (2016) 79-103. 10.1007/s40831-016-0043-y.

  4. F. Habashi, Handbook of extractive metallurgy. 1997: Wiley-VCH.

  5. C. G. Anderson, S. M. Nordwick and L. E. Krys Antimony separation process, US 5290338A (1992)

  6. Q. Wang and Y. Wang, Fundamental Electrochemical Behavior of Antimony in Alkaline Solution, Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy, 5 (4) (2019) 606-616. 10.1007/s40831-019-00253-7.

  7. M. K. Carpenter and M. W. Verbrugge, Electrochemical codeposition of indium and antimony from a chloroindate molten salt, Journal of Materials Research, 9 (10) (1994) 2584-2591. 10.1557/JMR.1994.2584.

  8. R. K. Iyer and S. G. Deshpande, Preparation of high-purity antimony by electrodeposition, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 17 (5) (1987) 936-940. 10.1007/BF01024359.

  9. R. S. Multani, T. Feldmann and G. P. Demopoulos, Antimony in the metallurgical industry: A review of its chemistry and environmental stabilization options, Hydrometallurgy, 164 (2016) 141-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2016.06.014.

  10. W. Liu, T.-z. Yang, Q.-h. Zhou, D.-c. Zhang and C.-m. Lei, Electrodeposition of Sb(III) in alkaline solutions containing xylitol, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 22 (4) (2012) 949-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61269-7.

  11. P. Raschman and E. Sminčáková, Kinetics of leaching of stibnite by mixed Na2S and NaOH solutions, Hydrometallurgy, 113-114 (2012) 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2011.11.017.

  12. J.-g. Yang and Y.-t. Wu, A hydrometallurgical process for the separation and recovery of antimony, Hydrometallurgy, 143 (2014) 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.01.002.

  13. R. H. Petrucci, General chemistry: principles and modern applications. 2017: Pearson.

  14. W. C. Holmes Electrolytic recovery of metals, US 2331395A (1940)

  15. N. F. R. Lindstrom Method for the electrolytic recovery of Sb, As, Hg and/or Sn, US 4017369A (1975)

  16. S. A. Awe and Å. Sandström, Electrowinning of antimony from model sulphide alkaline solutions, Hydrometallurgy, 137 (2013) 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.04.006.

  17. S. A. Awe, J.-E. Sundkvist and Å. Sandström, Formation of sulphur oxyanions and their influence on antimony electrowinning from sulphide electrolytes, Minerals Engineering, 53 (2013) 39-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2013.07.001.

  18. J. L. Rosa, A. Robin, M. B. Silva, C. A. Baldan and M. P. Peres, Electrodeposition of copper on titanium wires: Taguchi experimental design approach, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209 (3) (2009) 1181-1188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.021.

  19. M. S. Phadke, Quality engineering using robust design. 1995: Prentice Hall PTR.

  20. MiniTab. MiniTab Software. 2021 [cited 2021 5 Oct]; Available from: https://www.minitab.com/en-us/products/minitab/free-trial/.

  21. K. I. Popov, S. S. Djokić, N. D. Nikolić and V. D. Jović, Morphology of electrochemically and chemically deposited metals. 2016: Springer.

  22. A. Wikedzi, Å. Sandström and S. A. Awe, Recovery of antimony compounds from alkaline sulphide leachates, International Journal of Mineral Processing, 152 (2016) 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2016.05.006.

Published
2022/12/23
How to Cite
morcali, mehmet hakan, Kucukoglu, O., Cetiner, B. N., & Aktas, S. (2022). Non-diaphragm electrodeposition of antimony: Effect of process parameters and precipitating agents. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Metallurgy, 58(3), 461-473. Retrieved from https://aseestant.ceon.rs/index.php/jmm/article/view/36146
Issue
Vol. 58 No. 3 (2022)
Section
Original Scientific Paper

Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.

The Author(s) warrant that their manuscript is their original work that has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work was carried out. The Author(s) affirm that the article contains no unfounded or unlawful statements and does not violate the rights of others. The author(s) also affirm that they hold no conflict of interest that may affect the integrity of the Manuscript and the validity of the findings presented in it. The Corresponding author, as the signing author, warrants that he/she has full power to make this grant on behalf of the Author(s). Any software contained in the Supplemental Materials is free from viruses, contaminants or worms.

The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA).

Authors are permitted to deposit publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication.

Upon receiving the proofs, the Author(s) agree to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any typographical errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.

The Corresponding author agrees to inform his/her co-authors, of any of the above terms.