Contribution to the study of toughness in creep resistant steel welded joint

  • Esmail Ahmed University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Tomaz Vuherer University of Maribor, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Maribor, Slovenia
  • Vencislav Grabulov Institute for Materials Testing, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragomir Glišić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Stefan Dikić University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2700-0628
  • Nenad Radović University of Belgrade, Faculty of Technology and Metallurgy, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: Welding, heat affected zone, toughness, post welding heat treatment

Abstract


Steel P91 is widely used in power stations due to its goоd creep resistance and predictable performance. The aim of this work was to compare the toughness values of different zones in the weld joint with a sample subjected to a simulated thermal cycle. The workpieces were welded using Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW) for the root pass and Manual Metal Arc (MMA) for the filler deposition. Post Welding Heat Treatment (PWHT) was carried out at 740 °C for 2 hours. The welded joint was tested for microstructure, macrostructure, hardness, strength and toughness. The macrostructure showed all typical zones with a tempered martensite microstructure. The difference in the carbide distribution, which were confirmed by the hardness measurements, are the result of variations in the chemical composition. The tensile strength and the fracture which occurred in the base metal, indicate good properties of the welded joint. The crack initiation energies determined were similar in the Base Metal (BM), Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ), and Weld Metal (WM), while the crack propagation energy was lowest in the WM. This indicates that carbides control the crack initiation energy, while their distribution influences the crack propagation. The simulated HAZ samples showed lower toughness compared to the welded specimens, which can be attributed to the differences in the performed thermal cycles. During welding, the HAZ undergoes several thermal cycles in each pass, resulting in smaller austenitic grains compared to the simulated HAZ. Lower values of toughness indicate that the simulation provides a conservative approach, i.e. the measured toughness is lower than the toughness in a real welded butt.

References

[1] J. Hald, Metallurgy and creep properties of new 9-12%Cr steels, Steel Research 67 (1996) 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/srin.199605503.
[2] P.J. Ennis, A. Czyrska-Filemonowicz, Recent advances in creep-resistant steels for power plant applications, Sadhana 28 (2003) 709–730.
[3] B. Arivazhagan, M. Vasudevan, A comparative study on the effect of GTAW processes on the microstructure and mechanical properties of P91 steel weld joints, J Manuf Process 16 (2014) 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2014.01.003.
[4] D. Poláchová, M. Svobodová, P. Hájková, J. Uzel, Comparision of mechanical properties of P91 steel depending on temperature and annealing time, in: Plzen, 2012.
[5] C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, P. Kumar, N. Saini, Some studies on P91 steel and their weldments, J Alloys Compd 743 (2018) 332–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.120.
[6] B. Arivazhagan, M. Vasudevan, M. Kamaraj, Influence of low nickel (0.09 wt%) content on microstructure and toughness of P91 steel welds, Metals and Materials International 21 (2015) 538–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-015-4351-8.
[7] C.D. Lundin, Power generation industry materials and their weidability Austenitic stainless steels for nuclear service, Materials &Design 12 (1991) 193–197.
[8] F.V. Ellis, J.F. Henry, B.W. Roberts, Welding, Fabrication, and Service Experience with Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel, in: Pressure Vessels and Piping of ASME, 1990: pp. 55–63.
[9] Y. WANG, L. LI, Microstructure Evolution of Fine Grained Heat Affected Zone in Type IV Failure of P91 Welds, Weld J (2016).
[10] Y. Wang, K.H. Mayer, A. Scholz, C. Berger, H. Chilukuru, K. Durst, W. Blum, Development of new 11%Cr heat resistant ferritic steels with enhanced creep resistance for steam power plants with operating steam temperatures up to 650 °C, Materials Science and Engineering: A 510–511 (2009) 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.04.116.
[11] C. Coussement, A. Dhooge, E. Van Der Donckt, High Temperature Properties of Improved 9% Cr Steel Weldments, Int. J. Pres. Ves. & Piping 45 (1991) 163–178.
[12] S.H. Babu, G. Amarendra, R. Rajaraman, C.S. Sundar, Microstructural Characterization of ferritic/martensitic steels by positron annihilation spectroscopy, in: J Phys Conf Ser, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/443/1/012010.
[13] V. Thomas Paul, S. Saroja, M. Vijayalakshmi, Microstructural stability of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel during long term exposures at elevated temperatures, Journal of Nuclear Materials 378 (2008) 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.033.
[14] S. Kumar, C. Pandey, A. Goyal, A microstructural and mechanical behavior study of heterogeneous P91 welded joint, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104128.
[15] F.J.G. Silva, A.P. Pinho, A.B. Pereira, O.C. Paiva, Evaluation of welded joints in P91 steel under different heat-treatment conditions, Metals (Basel) 10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/met10010099.
[16] G.C. Bodine, C. Chakravarti, C.M. Owens, B.W. Roberts, D.M. Vandergriff, C.T. Ward, A Program for the Development of Advanced Ferritic Alloys for LMFBR Structural Application, in: ORNL/Sub-4291/1, TR-MCD015, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1977.
[17] L. Falat, L. Čiripová, V. Homolová, A. Kroupa, The influence of isothermal ageing and subsequent hydrogen charging at room temperature on local mechanical properties and fracture characteristics of martensitic- bainitic weldments for power engineering, Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Metallurgy 53 (2017) 373–382. https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB170515033F.
[18] H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, R.W.K. Honeycombe, Steels Microstructure and Properties, ElsevierLtd., 2006.
[19] R.W. Hertzberg, R.P. Vinci, J.L. Hertzberg, Deformation and Fracture Mechanics of Engineering Materials, 6th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, 2020.
[20] E.L. Bergquist, L.E. Svensson, L. Karlsson, Creep Properties of Weldments in Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on High Temperature Materials, Sigtuna, Sweden, 1998.
[21] C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Hot Impact Toughness of Various Zones of P91 Welded Pipes, J Mater Eng Perform 25 (2016) 2195–2210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2064-x.
[22] R.W. Swindeman, M.L. Santella, P.J. Maziasz, B.W. Roberts, K. Coleman, Issues in replacing Cr-Mo steels and stainless steels with 9Cr-1Mo-V steel, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 81 (2004) 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2003.12.009.
[23] T.C. Totemeier, J.A. Simpson, H. Tian, Effect of weld intercooling temperature on the structure and impact strength of ferritic-martensitic steels, Materials Science and Engineering: A 426 (2006) 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.023.
[24] C.R. Das, S.K. Albert, A.K. Bhaduri, G. Srinivasan, B.S. Murty, Effect of prior microstructure on microstructure and mechanical properties of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel weld joints, Materials Science and Engineering: A 477 (2008) 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.05.017.
[25] F. Abe, Torsten-Ulf Kern, Ramaswamy Viswanathan, Creep-resistant steels, Elsevier, 2008.
[26] R. Prokić-Cvetković, S. Kastelec-Macura, A. Milosavljević, O. Popović, M. Burzić, The effect of shielding gas composition on the toughness and crack growth parameters of AlMg4,5Mn weld metals, Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Metallurgy 46 (2010) 193–202. https://doi.org/10.2298/JMMB1002193P.
[27] J.C. Radon, C.E. Turner, Fracture toughness measurements by instrumented impact test*, 1969.
[28] H. Mehrer, The Open-Access Journal for the Basic Principles of Diffusion Theory, Experiment and Application Diffusion in Metals and Intermetallics-an Overview, Basic Principles of Diffusion Theory, Experiment and Application (2022).
[29] M. Taneike, K. Sawada, F. Abe, Effect of Carbon Concentration on Precipitation Behavior of M 23 C 6 Carbides and MX Carbonitrides in Martensitic 9Cr Steel during Heat Treatment, Metallurgical and materials transactions A (2004).
[30] G. Lojen, T. Vuherer, Optimization of PWHT of simulated haz subzones in p91 steel with respect to hardness and impact toughness, Metals (Basel) 10 (2020) 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/met10091215.
[31] L. Otávio, A. Affonso, Machinery Failure Analysis Handbook: Sustain Your Operations and Maximize Uptime, Gulf Pub, 2006.
[32] M. Svobodová, J. Douda, J. Cmakal, J. Sopoušek, J. Dubskýd, Similar and dissimilar weld joints of creep resisting steels 2009, Hradec nad Moravicí. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(69)90002-2
Published
2025/07/31
How to Cite
Ahmed, E., Vuherer, T., Grabulov, V., Glišić, D., Dikić, S., & Radović, N. (2025). Contribution to the study of toughness in creep resistant steel welded joint. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B: Metallurgy, 61(1), 99-109. Retrieved from https://aseestant.ceon.rs/index.php/jmm/article/view/54775
Issue
Vol. 61 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Original Scientific Paper

Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.

The Author(s) warrant that their manuscript is their original work that has not been published before; that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; and that its publication has been approved by all co-authors, if any, as well as tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities at the institution where the work was carried out. The Author(s) affirm that the article contains no unfounded or unlawful statements and does not violate the rights of others. The author(s) also affirm that they hold no conflict of interest that may affect the integrity of the Manuscript and the validity of the findings presented in it. The Corresponding author, as the signing author, warrants that he/she has full power to make this grant on behalf of the Author(s). Any software contained in the Supplemental Materials is free from viruses, contaminants or worms.

The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA).

Authors are permitted to deposit publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website at any time after publication.

Upon receiving the proofs, the Author(s) agree to promptly check the proofs carefully, correct any typographical errors, and authorize the publication of the corrected proofs.

The Corresponding author agrees to inform his/her co-authors, of any of the above terms.