Investigating the Causal Association Between Plasma Lipids and the Risk of Squamous Cervical Cancer: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

Plasma Lipids and Squamous Cervical Cancer: A Mendelian Study

  • Yuemei Cui Dalian Medical University
  • Ya Li Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Jing Na Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Junling Lu Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Xinyou Wang Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Shichao Han Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
  • Jun Wang Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University

Sažetak


Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between plasma lipid levels—total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TGs), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)—and the risk of squamous cervical cancer (SCC) using Mendelian Randomization (MR).

Materials and Method: Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for plasma lipid traits were obtained from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium (GLGC), and SCC outcome data were sourced from the FinnGen consortium. The primary analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supported by MR-Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode approaches. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the results, and the Steiger test was used to evaluate the directionality of the associations.

Results: The IVW analysis revealed that higher plasma levels of TC (OR: 1.777; 95% CI: 1.118–2.825; p = 0.015) and LDL-C (OR: 1.674; 95% CI: 1.013–2.767; p = 0.044) were associated with an increased risk of SCC. No significant associations were found between TGs (OR: 0.644; 95% CI: 0.343–1.212; p = 0.173) or HDL-C (OR: 1.050; 95% CI: 0.616–1.790; p = 0.857) and SCC.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of a causal relationship between elevated plasma TC and LDL-C levels and a higher risk of SCC, highlighting a novel aspect of SCC etiology. These findings may inform further functional and clinical research in the progression of SCC.

Reference

1. Xia C, Dong X, Li H, Cao M, Sun D, He S, et al. Cancer statistics in China and United States, 2022: profiles, trends, and determinants. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022;135(5):584-90.
2. He WQ, Li C. Recent global burden of cervical cancer incidence and mortality, predictors, and temporal trends. Gynecol Oncol 2021;163(3):583-92.
3. Wang R, Pan W, Jin L, Huang W, Li Y, Wu D, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccine against cervical cancer: Opportunity and challenge. Cancer Lett 2020;471:88-102.
4. Pirillo A, Casula M, Olmastroni E, Norata GD, Catapano AL. Global epidemiology of dyslipidaemias. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021;18(10):689-700.
5. Mariani M, Sassano M, Boccia S. Metabolic syndrome and gastric cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021;30(3):239-50.
6. Zhang D, Xi Y, Feng Y. Ovarian cancer risk in relation to blood lipid levels and hyperlipidemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational epidemiologic studies. Eur J Cancer Prev 2021;30(2):161-70.
7. Collado A, Marques P, Domingo E, Perello E, González-Navarro H, Martinez-Hervás S, et al. Novel Immune Features of the Systemic Inflammation Associated with Primary Hypercholesterolemia: Changes in Cytokine/Chemokine Profile, Increased Platelet and Leukocyte Activation. J Clin Med 2018;8(1):18.
8. Frontela-Noda M, Delgado-Herrera DC, Cabrera-Rode E, Hernández-Menéndez M, Durán-Bornot R, Villarreal-Acosta A, et al. Association between components of the metabolic syndrome and degree of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in Cuban women. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2019;13(2):1443-8.
9. Bowden J, Holmes MV. Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review. Res Synth Methods 2019;10(4):486-96.
10. Boef AG, Dekkers OM, le Cessie S. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44(2):496-511.
11. Willer CJ, Schmidt EM, Sengupta S, Peloso GM, Gustafsson S, Kanoni S, et al. Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nat Genet 2013;45(11):1274-83.
12. Kurki MI, Karjalainen J, Palta P, Sipilä TP, Kristiansson K, Donner KM, et al. FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population. Nature 2023;613(7944):508-18.
13. Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R, Surendran P, Burgess S, Danesh J, et al. PhenoScanner V2: an expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinformatics 2019;35(22):4851-3.
14. Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44(2):512-25.
15. Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B, Do R. Detection of widespread horizontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet 2018;50(5):693-8.
16. Burgess S, Scott RA, Timpson NJ, Davey Smith G, Thompson SG. Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors. Eur J Epidemiol 2015;30(7):543-52.
17. Hemani G, Tilling K, Davey Smith G. Orienting the causal relationship between imprecisely measured traits using GWAS summary data. PLoS Genet 2017;13(11):e1007081.
18. Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol 2013;37(7):658-65.
19. de Gonzalo-Calvo D, López-Vilaró L, Nasarre L, Perez-Olabarria M, Vázquez T, Escuin D, et al. Intratumor cholesteryl ester accumulation is associated with human breast cancer proliferation and aggressive potential: a molecular and clinicopathological study. BMC Cancer 2015;15(1):460.
20. Hannun YA, Obeid LM. Principles of bioactive lipid signalling: lessons from sphingolipids. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008;9(2):139-50.
21. Ouweneel AB, Thomas MJ, Sorci-Thomas MG. The ins and outs of lipid rafts: functions in intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, microparticles, and cell membranes: Thematic Review Series: Biology of Lipid Rafts. J Lipid Res 2020;61(5):676-86.
22. Iso H, Ikeda A, Inoue M, Sato S, Tsugane S. Serum cholesterol levels in relation to the incidence of cancer: the JPHC study cohorts. Int J Cancer 2009;125(11):2679-86.
23. Rao Kondapally Seshasai S, Kaptoge S, Thompson A, Di Angelantonio E, Gao P, Sarwar N, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting glucose, and risk of cause-specific death. N Engl J Med 2011;364(9):829-41.
24. Yu J, Zheng Q, Ding X, Zheng B, Chen X, Chen B, et al. Systematic re-analysis strategy of serum indices identifies alkaline phosphatase as a potential predictive factor for cervical cancer. Oncol Lett 2019;18(3):2356-65.
25. Huang P, Nedelcu D, Watanabe M, Jao C, Kim Y, Liu J, et al. Cellular Cholesterol Directly Activates Smoothened in Hedgehog Signaling. Cell 2016;166(5):1176-87.e14.
26. Jiang S, Wang X, Song D, Liu X, Gu Y, Xu Z, et al. Cholesterol Induces Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition of Prostate Cancer Cells by Suppressing Degradation of EGFR through APMAP. Cancer Res 2019;79(12):3063-75.
27. Jacobson TA, Ito MK, Maki KC, Orringer CE, Bays HE, Jones PH, et al. National lipid association recommendations for patient-centered management of dyslipidemia: part 1--full report. J Clin Lipidol 2015;9(2):129-69.
28. Mwangi GF, Niyonzima N, Atwine R, Tusubira D, Mugyenyi GR, Ssedyabane F. Dyslipidemia: prevalence and association with precancerous and cancerous lesions of the cervix; a pilot study. Lipids Health Dis 2024;23(1):3.
29. Raju K, Punnayanapalya SS, Mariyappa N, Eshwarappa SM, Anjaneya C, Kai LJ. Significance of the plasma lipid profile in cases of carcinoma of cervix: a tertiary hospital based study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15(8):3779-84.
30. Ma C, Xie J, Luo C, Yin H, Li R, Wang X, et al. OxLDL promotes lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic metastasis in gastric cancer by upregulating VEGF‑C expression and secretion. Int J Oncol 2019;54(2):572-84.
31. Zhang J, Wang X, Vikash V, Ye Q, Wu D, Liu Y, et al. ROS and ROS-Mediated Cellular Signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016;2016:4350965.
32. Soran H, Hama S, Yadav R, Durrington PN. HDL functionality. Curr Opin Lipidol 2012;23(4):353-66.
33. Nagel G, Bjorge T, Concin H, Lukanova A, Manjer J, Hallmans G, et al. P2-210 Metabolic syndrome and cervical cancer in the metabolic syndrome and cancer project (ME-CAN). 2011;65(Suppl 1):A279-A.
34. Ulmer H, Bjørge T, Concin H, Lukanova A, Manjer J, Hallmans G, et al. Metabolic risk factors and cervical cancer in the metabolic syndrome and cancer project (Me-Can). Gynecol Oncol 2012;125(2):330-5.
35. Radišauskas R, Kuzmickienė I, Milinavičienė E, Everatt R. Hypertension, serum lipids and cancer risk: A review of epidemiological evidence. Medicina (Kaunas) 2016;52(2):89-98.
36. Sun Y, Meng H, Jin Y, Shi X, Wu Y, Fan D, et al. Serum lipid profile in gynecologic tumors: a retrospective clinical study of 1,550 patients. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2016;37(3):348-52.
Objavljeno
2025/06/17
Rubrika
Original paper