Level of Analysis Problem in the Post-Cold War Deterrence: The Need for Regional Perspectives
Sažetak
The end of the Cold War has had profound effect on deterrence theory and practice. Contrary to the perceived belief that deterrence was a dead concept after the demise of the Cold War rivalries, it lives, even grabs more attentions with recent developments in international relations. During the entire Cold War period, deterrence had been studied within a systemic context in which nuclear superpowers operated in a bipolar world. In the post-Cold War era, with a renewing interest in deterrence theory and practice, deterrence at regional level appears to be more pertinent to new security environment. However, current literature on the concept does not pay adequate attention to deterrence at this level. In this sense, Regional Security Complex Theory(RSCT) has an important explanatory power for resolving regional dynamics in which deterrence practice is generally shaped. This article aims to bridge the gap between deterrence studies and regions, as a level of analysis, by integrating RSCT within the wider deterrence discussion.
Reference
Acton, James. 2011. Deterrence during Disarmament: Deep Nuclear Reductions and International Security. Abingdon: Routledge.
Acharya, Amitav. 2009. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon,New York: Routledge.
Adler, Emanuel, and Michael Barnett, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Graham T, and Philip Zelikow. 1999. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Longman.
Anderson, Justin V., Jeffrey A. Larsen, and Polly M. Holdorf. 2013. “Extended Deterrence and Allied Assurance: Key Concepts and Current Challenges for U.S. Policy”. 69. INSS Occasional Paper 69. USAF Academy, Colorado: USAF Institute for National Security Studies.
Black, Jeremy. 2011. History of Diplomacy. [S.l.]: Reaktion Pub.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2004. Security Communities and Their Neighbours: Regional Fortresses or Global Integrators?. Palgrave Macmillan.Brooks, Stephen G., and William C. Wohlforth. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neo Realism to Structural Realism. Reprint edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and Professor Ole Weaver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Carpenter, Ted Galen. 1991. “The New World Disorder.” Foreign Policy (84): 24–39. Doi:10.2307/1148779.
Defence, Jonathan Marcus BBC, and Diplomatic Correspondent. 2014. “France’s Enduring Nuclear Deterrent.” BBC News. Accessed April 1. http://www.bbc.co.uk/ news/world-radio-and-tv-17512596.
Defense, Department Of. 2014. Quadrennial Defense Review Report 2014. Department of Defense.
Deutsch, Karl Wolfgang, Sidney A. Burrell, and Robert A. Kann. 1969. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Santa Barbara:Greenwood Press Reprint.
“Department Of Defense: Nuclear Posture Review.” 2014. Govermental. Department Of Defense. Accessed May 25. http://www.defense.gov/npr/.
Dror, Yehezkel. 1980. Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem. Millwood, N.Y.: Kraus Reprint.
Edward, Mansfield, and Helen Milner. 1999. “The New Wave of Regionalism.” International Organization 53 (3): 589–627.
Ethier, Wilfred J. 1998. “The New Regionalism.” The Economic Journal 108 (449): 1149–1161.
Fawcett, Louise, and Andrew Hurrell, ed. 1996. Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order. Oxford University Press, USA.
George, Alexander L, and Richard Smoke. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
George, Alexander L. 1991. Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
Hettne, Björn, András Inotai, and Osvaldo Sunkel. 1999. Globalism and the New Regionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hooper, Mira Rapp, and Linton Brooks. “Extended Deterrence, Assurance, and Reassurance in the Pacific during the Second Nuclear Age.” Council on Foreign Relations, 2013. http://www.cfr.org/arms-control-disarmament-and- nonproliferation/extended-deterrence-assurance-reassurance-pacific-during- second-nuclear-age/p31778.
Hudson, Valerie M. “Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1 (1): 1–30. doi:10.1111/j.1743- 8594.2005.00001.x.
Huntington, Samuel P. 1999. “The Lonely Superpower.” Foreign Affairs 78 (2): 35–49. doi:10.2307/20049207.
Huth, Paul, and Bruce Russett. 1988. “Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation.” International Studies Quarterly: 29–45.
Ikenberry, G. John. 1996. “The Myth of Post-Cold War Chaos.” Foreign Affairs 75 (3) (May 1): 79–91. doi:10.2307/20047582.
Jervis, Robert. 1979. “Deterrence Theory Revisited.” World Politics 31 (2): 289–324. doi:10.2307/2009945.
Jervis, Robert, and Janice Gross Stein. 1989. Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kaplan, Morton. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. 1st Edition. Science Editions, Inc.
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2005. A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kegley, Charles W, and Kenneth L Schwab. 1991. After the Cold War: Questioning the Morality of Nuclear Deterrence. Boulder: Westview Press.
Kelly, Robert E. 2007. “Security Theory in the ‘New Regionalism’’.” International Studies Review 9 (2): 197–229.
Kirkpatrick, Melanie. 2009. “Why We Don’t Want a Nuclear-Free World.” The Wall Street Journal, July 13. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB124726489588925407.
Knopf, Jeffrey W. 2010. “The Fourth Wave in Deterrence Research.” Contemporary Security Policy 31 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1080/13523261003640819.
Krauthammer, Charles. 1990. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70 (1): 23–33. doi:10.2307/20044692.
Kristensen, Hans M., and Robert S. Norris. 2011. “British Nuclear Forces, 2011.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 67 (5): 89–97. doi:10.1177/0096340211421474.
Lake, David A, and Patrick M. Morgan. 1997. Regional Orders: Building Security in a New World. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Lawrence, Robert Z. 1996. Regionalism, Multilateralism, and Deeper Integration. Brookings Institution Press.
Layne, Christopher. 1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17 (4): 5. doi:10.2307/2539020.
Layne, Christopher. 2006. “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment.” International Security 31 (2): 7–41. doi:10.1162/ isec.2006.31.2.7.
Lebow, Richard Ned, and Janice Gross Stein. 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter.” World Politics 41 (2): 208–224. doi:10.2307/2010408.
Lemke, Douglas. 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge, UK ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lizee, Pierre P. 2011. A Whole New World: Reinventing International Studies for the Post-Western World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Long, Austin G. 2008. Deterrence: From Cold War to Long War : Lessons from Six Decades of Rand Deterrence Research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
Lupovici, Amir. 2010. “The Emerging Fourth Wave of Deterrence Theory—Toward a New Research Agenda.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (3): 705–732.
Morgan, Patrick M. 2006. International Security: Problems and Solutions. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Morgan, Patrick M. 2003. Deterrence Now. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, Patrick M. 2009. “Collective Actor Deterrence.” In Complex Deterrence: Strategy in the Global Age, edited by Thaza Varkey Paul and James J. Wirtz, 172–202. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’Hanlon, Michael E. 1992. The Art of War in the Age of Peace U.S. Military Posture for the Post-Cold War World. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.
O’Neil, Andrew. Asia, the US and Extended Nuclear Deterrence: Atomic Umbrellas in the Twenty-First Century. 1 edition. London, New York: Routledge, 2013.
“Obama Prague Speech On Nuclear Weapons: FULL TEXT.” 2009. Huffington Post. May 6. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/04/05/obama-prague-speech-on- nu_n_183219.html.
Ozer, Verda. 2014. “Cold War: Back to the Future?” April 22, http://www. hurriyetdailynews.com/cold-war-back-to-the-future-.aspx?pageID=449&nID=65358 &NewsCatID=466.
Paul, T. V, Patrick M Morgan, and James J. Wirtz. 2009. Complex Deterrence: Strategy in the Global Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pillar, Paul R. 2014. “The Forgotten Principles of Deterrence.” The National Interest, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/paul-pillar/the-forgotten-principles- deterrence-10148.
Quester, George. 1966. Deterrence Before Hiroshima: The Airpower Background of Modern Strategy. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Rosecrance, Richard. 1991. “Regionalism and the Post: Cold War Era.” International Journal 46 (3): 373. doi:10.2307/40202895.
Sagan, Scott Douglas. 1993. The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents, and Nuclear Weapons. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Schweller, Randall L. 1999. “Realism and the Present Great Power System: Growth and Positional Conflict over Scarce Resources.” In Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War, edited by Ethan B. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno, 28–68. New York: Columbia University Press.
Singer J, David. 1961. “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations.” World Politics 14, (S1): 77–92. doi:10.2307/2009557.
Sperandei, Maria. 2006. “Bridging Deterrence and Compellence: An Alternative Approach to the Study of Coercive Diplomacy.” International Studies Review 8 (2): 253–280.
Tanter, Richard, and Peter Hayes. 2011. “Beyond the Nuclear Umbrella: Re-Thinking the Theory and Practice of Nuclear Extended Deterrence in East Asia and the Pacific.” Pacific Focus 26 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1111/j.1976-5118.2011.01053.x.
Ullman, Harlan K. 1985. “Is Deterrence Dead?” The RUSI Journal 130 (3): 31–36. doi:10.1080/03071848508522683.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. 1st ed. Illinois: Waveland Press Inc.
Weede, Erich. 1989. “Extended Deterrence, Superpower Control, and Militarized Interstate Disputes, 1962–76.” Journal of Peace Research 26 (1): 7–17. doi:10.1177/00 22343389026001002.
Wohlforth, William C. 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World.” International Security 24 (1): 5–41.
Authors retain copyright of the published papers and grant to the publisher the non-exclusive right to publish the article, to be cited as its original publisher in case of reuse, and to distribute it in all forms and media.
The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided and it is indicated if changes were made. / The published articles will be distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA). It is allowed to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and remix, transform, and build upon it for any purpose, even commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, it is indicated if changes were made and the new work is distributed under the same license as the original.
Users are required to provide full bibliographic description of the original publication (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages), as well as its DOI code. In electronic publishing, users are also required to link the content with both the original article published in Journal of Regional Security and the licence used.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted to deposit author’s pre-print / author’s post-print (accepted version) / publisher's version (PDF) of their work in an institutional repository, subject-based repository, author's personal website (including social networking sites, such as ResearchGate, Academia.edu, etc.), and/or departmental website prior or during the submission process / at any time after the acceptance of the manuscript / at any time after publication.
Full bibliographic information (authors, article title, journal title, volume, issue, pages) about the original publication must be provided and links must be made to the article's DOI and the license.