GENERATIVE AI FOR TEN-YEAR PREDICTION OF MULTIMORBIDITY: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE AND SYNTHETIC DATA
Abstract
Introduction/Aim: The aim of the work is to present a methodological framework for a ten-year prediction of multimorbidity using a generative, sequential model based on transformer architecture, with full reliance on publicly available and synthetic data, without processing identifiable patient data.
Methods: A methodological study was conducted with primary training and evaluation on the Synthea synthetic cohort (≥100,000 records), with technical checks on MIMIC-III (de-identified real intensive care data). Outcomes (≥1,000) were defined by mapping ICD-10/ICD-10-CM codes to PheCode categories. The model is a transformer with multitask outputs (one for each target) and time embeddings, with evaluation of discrimination (AUPRC, AUROC), calibration (Brier, intercept/slope) and clinical utility (Decision Curve Analysis). Sensitivity analyzes and basic fairness checks (gender, age) were conducted.
Results: The model achieved the best results in cardiometabolic and oncological domains, moderate in respiratory/renal, and more modest in mental/infectious outcomes. Calibration was good in the intermediate risk ranges; DCA showed a positive net benefit at thresholds relevant for opportunistic screening (≈5–15% 10-year risk). Sensitivity analyzes confirmed the stability of ranking performance across changes in rarity thresholds and history length, with no evidence of significant label leakage.
Conclusion: A reproducible and ethically acceptable approach to long-term multi-disease risk prediction using a generative transformer on public/synthetic sets is presented. This "health barometer" can support triage and personalized prevention, while recommending mandatory external validation, local re-calibration and equity monitoring prior to clinical application.
References
2. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms. BMJ. 2017;357:j2099. Doi:10.1136/bmj.j2099
3. Li Y, Rao S, Solares JRA, et al. BEHRT: Transformer for Electronic Health Records. Sci Rep. 2020;10:7155. Doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62922-y
4. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource… PLoS Med. 2015;12(3):e1001779. Doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779
5. Johnson AEW, Pollard TJ, Shen L, et al. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Sci Data. 2016;3:160035. Doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.35
6. Walonoski J, Kramer M, Nichols J, et al. Synthea: generating synthetic patients and HER. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(3):230-238. Doi:10.1093/jamia/ocx079
7. Bouderhem R. Shaping the future of AI in healthcare through ethics and governance. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024;11:416. Doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02894-w
8. Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, et al. TRIPOD+AI statement. BMJ. 2024;385:e078378. Doi:10.1136/bmj-2023-078378
9. Wu P, Gifford A, Meng X, et al. Mapping ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Codes to Phecodes. JMIR Med Inform. 2019;7(4):e14325. Doi:10.2196/14325
10. Saito T, Rehmsmeier M. The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot... PLOS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0118432. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118432
11. Richardson E, Trevizani R, Greenbaum JA, et al. The ROC curve accurately assesses unbalanced datasets. Patterns (NY). 2024;5(6):100994. Doi:10.1016/j.patter.2024.100994
12. Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, et al. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019;17:230. Doi:10.1186/s12916-019-1466-7
13. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565-574 Doi:10.1177/0272989X06295361
14. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-453. Doi:10.1126/science.aax2342
15. Liu M, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, et al. A translational perspective towards clinical AI fairness. NPJ Digit Med. 2023;6:172. Doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00918-4
16. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:44-56. Doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
