Correlation between fractional clearance and optical outcomes of LASIK myopia correction
Abstract
Excimer laser pulses using the LASIK method ablate the corneal stroma, achieving its remodeling to desired optical characteristics. Besides correcting ametropia, it is desirable to minimize the induction of higher-order optical aberrations (HOA), as they affect the occurrence of glare and halos in night vision conditions. Fractional clearance (FC) represents the ratio of the treated optical zone (OZ) diameter to the pupil diameter in scotopic lighting conditions. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between the enlargement of the treated OZ diameter and the increase in FC index on postoperative HOA levels. A prospective study included 37 subjects (74 eyes) with myopia treated with the LASIK method. The eye with higher residual stromal bed value was treated with an OZ diameter of 7.0 mm, and the other eye of the same patient with an OZ diameter of 6.5 mm. After 6 months, objective evaluation of optical outcomes was performed using an Analyzer device. The mean FC value in the group of eyes treated with OZ 6.5 mm is 2.138 (SD 0.30), and in the group treated with OZ 7.0 mm is 2.325 (SD 0.37), with a statistically highly significant difference (t=3.64; p<0.001). A smaller induction of all measured HOA was found when a wider OZ of 7.0 mm was treated, with the statistically most significant reduction observed in spherical aberration induction. The increase in FC index is proportional to the enlargement of the treated OZ diameter. With an increase in FC value, the level of all HOA decreases after the LASIK procedure, with the most significant reduction observed in spherical aberration induction. Enlargement of OZ to 7.0 mm, when corneal structural characteristics allow it, improves postoperative optical outcomes.
References
2. Zhang Y, Du Y, He M, Zhang Y, Du Z. Comparison of visual quality after wavefront-guided LASIK in patients with different levels of preoperative total ocular higher-order aberrations: a retrospective study. PeerJ. 2024; 12: e17940. doi:10.7717/peerj.17940
3. Rush SW, Pickett CJ, Wilson BJ, Rush RB. Topography-Guided LASIK: A Prospective Study Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023; 17: 2815-2824. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S429991
4. Resan M, Vukosavljević M, Milivojević M. Fotorefraktivna keratektomija u korekciji miopije - naše jednogodišnje iskustvo. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2012; 69(10): 852-7. doi: 10.2298/VSP1210852R
5. Vukosavljević M, Milivojević M, Resan M, Cerović V. Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) u korekciji miopije i hipermetropije - naše jednogodišnje iskustvo. Vojnosanitetski pregled. 2009; 66(12): 979-84. doi: 10.2298/VSP0912979V
6. Li H, Han Q, Zhang J, Shao T, Wang H, Long K. Role of corneal epithelial thickness during myopic regression in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1): 481. doi:10.1186/s12886-022-02727-x
7. Peyman A, Irajpour M, Yazdi M, et al. Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Ophthalmol. 2025; 2025: 8833830. doi:10.1155/joph/8833830
8. Alvarado-Villacorta R, Yim TW, Hernandez-Quintela E, De La Torre-Gonzalez E, Loza Munarriz CA, Martinez-Zapata MJ. Surgical interventions for presbyopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 4(4): CD015711. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD015711.pub2
9. Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Influence of pupil and optical zone diameter on higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(12): 2272-2280. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.10.023
10. Susanna BN, Mohan N, Santhiago MR, Randleman JB. Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Outcomes and Complications: 2016 to 2023. J Refract Surg. 2025; 41(4): e391-e403. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20250312-01
11. Arnon R, Levinger E, Pikkel J, Yahalomi T, Sela T, Munzer G, et al. Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis in Flat, Normal, and Steep Corneas. Cornea. 2024; 44(6): 701-708. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003708
12. Almutairi MN, Alshehri AM, Alhoumaily AY, Alnahdi O, Taha MA, Gangadharan S. Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in hyperopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1): 140. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-03956-6
13. Zhang G, Cao H, Qu C. Efficacy, Safety, Predictability, and Stability of LASIK for Presbyopia Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2023; 39(9): 627-638. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20230802-02
14. Wei S, Zheng Y, Fu C, Zhang L, Hu Y, Dong Y, et al. One-Year Outcomes of Topography-Guided LASIK for Myopia and Astigmatism. J Ophthalmol. 2026; 2026: 3410286. doi: 10.1155/joph/3410286
15. Koosha N, Riazi MS, Janfaza P, Mohammadbeigy I, Rahimi A, Khoshali M, et al. Laser vision correction after radial keratotomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2024; 50(7): 767-776. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001426
16. Liu C. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of laser correction with a mechanical and laser microkeratome for myopia. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2024; 88(2): e20230292. doi: 10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0292
17. Huang Y, Fu D, Wang Y, Peng X, Han T, Zhou X. Changes in the effective optical zone following hyperopic keratorefractive lenticule extraction. Ann Med. 2025; 57(1): 2453628. doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2453628
18. Fayaz F, Pourazizi M, Nabovati P, Peyman A, Noorshargh P. Exploring the Impact of Refractive and Ocular Residual Astigmatism on Stereopsis After Photorefractive Keratectomy in Patients With Myopic Astigmatism. J Ophthalmol. 2026; 2026: 6140496. doi:10.1155/joph/6140496
