english

  • Vladimir Mikić
Ključne reči: english

Sažetak


Posmatrano iz šire istorijske perspektive, najnoviji period ustavnog života Sjedinjenih Američkih Država rizikuje da ostane upamćen kao onaj u kojem je postupak predsedničkog opoziva korišćen neuporedivo češće nego ikada ranije. Ovo skreće pažnju na temu krivične odgovornosti predsednika, o kojoj sam Ustav ćuti. Istovremeno, čini se da zakonodavstvo i sudska praksa izbegavaju da se bave ovim važnim i prilično aktuelnim pitanjem. Pitanje da li predsednički imunitet štiti predsednika ili bivšeg predsednika od hapšenja, suđenja ili kažnjavanja za dela učinjena tokom predsedničkog mandata predstavlja posebno složenu pravnu zagonetku. Ovo je posebno važno jer se čini da tradicionalni sistem "kočnica i ravnoteža" pokazuje znake slabosti zbog politizovane procedure, posebno zato što nema čvrstih pravnih smernica ni jasnih teorijskih perspektiva na ovom planu.

Reference

Brisbin, R. A. Jr. (1998). Justice Antonin Scalia and the Conservative Revival.

Bulajić, S. M. (2019). Yet another look at the U.S. constitutionalism and the phenomenon of ‘We the People’. Strani pravni život 2019 (4), 93-102. https://doi: 10.5937/spz63-23850

Congressional Record, Proceedings and Debates of the 117th Congress, First Session, Vol. 167, Washington, Tuesday, February 9, 2021, No. 24, p. S589-D108.

Constitution of the USA (Art. I, Sec. 2 Para. 5, Art. I, Sec. 3, Para. 6-7, Art I, Sec. 8, Para. 18, Art. I, Sec. 9, Art. II, Sec. 2, Para. 1, Art. II, Sec. 4, Art. III, Sec. 4).

Galbraith, J. (2020), President Trump Impeached and Acquitted of Charges Relating to His Conduct of Foreign Affairs. American Journal of International Law, 114(3), 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.40

Hastings v. United States, 802 F. Supp. 490 (D.D.C. 1992), U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia - 802 F. Supp. 490 (D.D.C. 1992), September 17, 1992, pp. 491-505.

Lozano, N. A. (2019), Can President Trump Become His Own Judge and Jury? A Legal Analysis of President Trump’s Amenability to Criminal Indictment and Ability to Self-Pardon. Nova Law Review 43(2), 150-176.

Opinions of the Office of Legal Counsel, Memorandum Opinion for the Attorney General, A Sitting President's Amenability to Indictment and Criminal Prosecution, Volume 24/2000, p. 222-260.

Popp, K. A. (2000), The Impeachment of President Clinton: An Ugly Mix of Three Powerful Forces. Law and Contemporary Problems, 63 (1-2), 223-243.

Prakash, S. B. (2021), Prosecuting and Punishing Our Presidents, Texas Law Review, 100 (56), 55-113.

Proclamation No. 4311, U.S. Statutes at Large 88 (1974): 2502-2503, September 8, 1974.

Skibell, R. (2004). Separation of Powers and the Commander in Chief: Congress's Authority to Override Presidential Decisions in Crisis Situations. Georgia Mason Law Review, 13(1), 183-218.

The Economist, March 9th-15th 2002, 8.

United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683 (1974) (Supreme Court of the United States of America, July 24, 1974).
Objavljeno
2024/01/11
Broj časopisa
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članci