RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SERBIA TWO DECADES AFTER ITS INTRODUCTION INTO THE SCHOOL SYSTEM: OPINIONS AND ATTITUDES OF STUDENTS ON THE SUBJECT, THE MODEL AND SOME ISSUES
Abstract
In the course of more than two decades since the introduction of Religious Education into the Serbian school system, there has been a scientific and social need to check the attitudes of current students regarding its status, the applied model and the impact of attending Religious Education on the formation of attitudes on certain social issues, about which churches and religious communities have their own doctrinal positions. The research, carried out by the online survey technique, on a snowball sample, was carried out during May and June 2022, among students of all faculties of education in Serbia. The choice of faculty of education students as a statistical group is related to the fact that teachers are the ones who first meet students as part of school socialization and significantly influence the formation of their social attitudes in the early period of institutional socialization. Therefore, it was important to check their views on this matter.
The most important findings show that the absolute majority of students believe that Religious Education should become a compulsory subject through primary schooling, but that the applied model should be modified in terms of content. The students are of the opinion that at the age when the key socialization of the personality is carried out (the first four grades of primary school, pupils aged 7-11), religious teaching should be organized according to the confessional model, in the students' faith, as is the case now, while in the other four grades (from the fifth to the eighth, pupils aged 11-15) primary school, it should be organized on non-confessional principles, which would enable the knowledge of scientific views on religion, as well as knowledge of the views of the world of other religions, as well as consideration of religion in the key of an important social phenomenon (historical, philosophical, moral, sociological, etc.).
An important finding is confirmation of the position that the choice between these two subjects (Religious Education and Civic Education) influences the formation of students' social attitudes regarding certain social issues, on which churches and religious communities have their own clear viewpoints, which can also explain their unity, independent of religion and confession, regarding the existence of religious teaching in the educational system of Serbia. It should be noted that, through the introduction of Religious Education into the school system, especially through the confessional model, the functions of the church (that is, religious communities) and the school as "state ideological apparatuses" (Althusser) actually came into symbiosis. The school "assists" the church in the performance of one of the functions that should be exclusively church - religious instruction according to a certain catechism, and this need can be understood through the ritual dimension of religiosity widespread among the most numerous Orthodox believers in Serbia, while the other dimensions of religiosity are more or less neglected or certainly less present.
The research confirmed the impact of attending religious classes on the formation of certain social attitudes among respondents, so from that aspect, the perseverance of churches and religious communities to maintain it in the school system should be observed, according to the confessional model.
References
Базић, Јован. 2011. „Национални идентитет у процесу политичке социјализације”. Српска политичка мисао 4/2011: 335–354. https://doi.org/10.22182/spm.3442011.17
Бодрожић, Ђуро. 2014. „Религија и идентитет на Балкану”. Политичка ревија 1/2014: 25–43. https://doi.org/10.22182/pr.3912014.2
Ивановић, Станоје. „Образовање између религије и секуларизације”. Иновације у настави 28 (2): 13–17. DOI: 10.5937/inovacije1502013I
Јањић, Јован. 2018. Српска православна црква у комунизму и посткомунизму. Београд: Новости
Настић, Невена. 2020. „Социолошки приступ разумевању православне верске наставе у првом циклусу основног образовања и васпитања”. Зборник радова Учитељског факултета Призрен-Лепосавић бр. 14: 485–497. DOI: 10.5937/zrufpl2014485N
Павле, еписком рашко-призренски. 2013. Извештаји са распетог Косова. Београд: Издавачка фондација Архиепископије београдско-карловачке, Фондација патријарх Павле
Петровић, Јасмина. 2011. „Вредносни ставови студената: религиозност, просоцијални ставови и однос према будућности”. Годишњак Српске академије образовања за 2010: 881–896. Доступно на http://www.sao.org.rs/documents/G2010_2x.pdf
Петровић, Јасмина и Урош Шуваковић. 2013. „Религиозност, конфесионална дистанца и место верске припадности у структури идентитета студената у Косовској Митровици”. У Национални идентитет и религија, ур. Зоран Милошевић и Живојин Ђурић, 245–264. Београд: Институт за политичке студије
Радушки, Нада. 2018. „Језичка и религијска компонента националног идентитета становништва Србије”. У Национални идентитет и етнички односи, прир. Нада Радушки, 21-36. Београд: Институт за политичке студије. Доступно на https://www.ips.ac.rs/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/zbornik-Nacionalni-identitet-i-etnicki-odnosi-knjiga-6.pdf
Републички завод за статистику Србију (РЗС). 2013. Попис становништва, домаћинстава и станова у Републици Србији у 2011. Становништво: вероисповест, матерњи језик и национална припадност. Доступно на https://pod2.stat.gov.rs/ObjavljenePublikacije/Popis2011/Knjiga4_Veroispovest.pdf
Републички завод за статистику Србију (РЗС). 2021. Високо образовање 2020/2021. Београд: РЗС. Доступно на https://publikacije.stat.gov.rs/G2021/pdf/G20216006.pdf
Републички завод за статистику Србију (РЗС). 2022. Попис 2022: Матерњи језик, вероисповест и национална припадност. Доступно на: https://popis2022.stat.gov.rs/sr-Cyrl/5-vestisaopstenja/news-events/20230616-st
Стојшин, Снежана, С. 2023. „Промене у националној структури становништва Србије почетком 21. века”. Социолошки преглед 57 (3): 823–859. doi: 10.5937/socpreg57-45345
Шуваковић, Урош. 2000. Испитивање политичких ставова. Београд: Завод за уџбенике и наставна средства
Шуваковић, Урош. 2012. „Разбијање Југославије и неоколонијални положај новонасталих држава бившег југословенског простора”. У Разбијање Југославије, ур. Живојин Ђурић, Милош Кнежевић и М. Јовановић, 141–179. Београд: Институт за политичке студије
Шуваковић, Урош. 2014. Транзиција: прилог социолошком проучавању друштвених промена. Косовска Митровица: Филозофски факултет Универзитета у Приштини
Altiser, Luj. 2015. Ideologija i državni ideološki aparati, drugo i dopunjeno izdanje. Loznica: Karpos
Avramović, Sima. 2016. „Religious Education in Public Schools and Religious Identity in Post-Communist Serbia”. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 64 (3): 25–56. DOI: 10.5937/AnaliPFB1603025A
Berger, Peter L. 1999. „The Desecularization of the World: The Global Overview”. In The Desecularization of the World: Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Ed. Peter L. Berger 1–18. Washington D.C.: Ethics and Public Policy Center
Blagojević, Mirko. 2009. „Revitalizacija religije i religioznost u Srbiji: stvarnost ili mit?” Filozofija i društvo (2): 97-117. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0902097B
Cvitković, Ivan. 2001. „Nacija, nacionalizam i religije Balkana”. U Religije Balkana: susreti i prožimanja, prir. Milan Vukomanović, Marinko Vučinić, 86–100. Beograd: Beogradska otvorena škola
Cvitković, Ivan. 2009. „Has the `Return` of Religions Occurred or `Return` to the Religion?” In Revitalization of Religion – Theoretical and Comparative Approaches, ed. Danijela Gavrilović, 15–24. Niš: Yugoslav Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Đorđević, Dragoljub. 2009. „Religiousness of the Serbs at the Begining of the 21st Century: What Is It About?” In Revitalization of Religion – Theoretical and Comparative Approaches, ed. Danijela Gavrilović, 57–64. Niš: Yugoslav Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Flere, Sergej & Rudi Klanjšek. 2008. „Serbian orthodox religiousness: An empirical and comparative portrait”. Sociološki pregled 42 (1): 27–44. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg0801027F
Flere, Sergej & Rudi Klanjšek. 2014. „Was Tito’s Yugoslavia totalitarian?” Communiste and Post-communiste Studies 47 (2): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.04.009
Jaurès, Jean. 1904. „Discours de Castres le 30 juillet 1904”. Laïcité Aujourd'hui, 18 janvier 2009. Доступно на: https://www.laicite-aujourdhui.fr/?Jean-Jaures
Koceva, Daniela. 2015. „Introduction of Religious Education in the Republic of Macedonia”. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 19: 225–233.
Kulska, J. (2020). Bridging the Nation and the State: Catholic Church In Poland As Political Actor. Politics and Religion 14(2): 263–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54561/prj1402263k
Maksimović, Iskra. 1998. „Religijsko obrazovanje i nastava religije u državnim školama u Evropi”. Nastava i vaspitanje 4/1998: 717–727
Parker, Charlie, Sam Scott, and Alastair Geddes. 2019. Snowball Sampling. In Research Methods Foundation. Eds. Atkinson Paul, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W. Sakshaug and Richard A.Williams. SAGE Publication Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036831710
Ramet, Sabrina P. (Ed) 2014. Religion and Politics in Post-Socialist Central and Southeastern Europe: Chalanges since 1989. Palgrave Macmillan
Staničić, Frane. 2021. „Religious Education in the Public Sphere in Slovenia”. Law, Identity and Values 2/2021: 143–162. https://doi.org/10.55073/2021.2.143-162
Šuvaković, Uroš V., Jelena R. Petrović & Ivko A. Nikolić. 2023. „Confessional Instruction or Religious Education: Attitudes of Female Students at the Teacher Education Faculties in Serbia”. Religions 14 (2): 160–173. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020160
Teece, Geoff. 2010. „Is it learning about and from religions, religion or religious education? And is it any wonder some teachers don’t get it?” British Journal of Religious Education 32 (2): 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200903537399
Vukomanović, Milan. 2001. Sveto i mnoštvo: izazovi religijskog pluralizma. Beograd: Čigoja štampa.