CROATIA AND THE STRATEGY OF (EXTENDED) DETERRENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF THE UKRAINE CONFLICT: NORMATIVE FOUNDATIONS AND PRACTICAL CHALLENGES
Abstract
This paper examines Croatia's involvement in (extended) deterrence strategy as a critical component of NATO's collective defense strategy and its broader implications for regional stability, particularly in bilateral relations with Serbia. The research aims to analyze how Croatia’s NATO membership has influenced its strategic positioning and contributed to the development of its security policies. It also explores the impact of the Ukraine conflict on NATO’s strategic priorities and Croatia’s alignment with these objectives. The research draws on a comparative analysis of Croatia's national security and defense strategies from 2002 to 2017, reflecting a transition shaped by NATO and EU integration. The study demonstrates how Croatia has integrated its national defense strategy with broader Euro-Atlantic frameworks. Special attention is given to Croatia’s contributions to NATO missions and its political and logistical support for Ukraine. These engagements illustrate Croatia’s commitment to NATO’s objectives, including bolstering collective security and deterrence measures against potential threats, notably from Russia. This includes military assistance amounting to €181 million and alignment with EU sanctions against Russia. Despite these efforts, internal political disagreements, such as debates over training Ukrainian forces, reveal Croatia's challenges in balancing national interests with alliance obligations. The research highlights the exacerbation of the "security dilemma" between Croatia and Serbia, driven by differing security policies and the broader geopolitical consequences of the Ukraine conflict. Fueled by the Ukraine conflict, this dilemma is analyzed through the lens of arms races, strategic doctrines, and contrasting geopolitical alignments. The paper suggests that these dynamics aggravate existing mistrust and challenge regional stability in the Balkans. Croatia's NATO-driven deterrence strategy contrasts sharply with Serbia's military neutrality and strategic partnership with Russia, intensifying regional tensions and arms races. These dynamics underline the risk of destabilization in the Balkans if such tensions are not managed through sustained diplomatic efforts. The research offers a critical perspective on how national security strategies interact with multilateral policies, providing new insights into the regional consequences of global strategies like NATO’s deterrence framework. It underscores the need for Croatia and its neighbors to prioritize long-term strategic goals and regional cooperation to mitigate the risks posed by evolving security challenges. The findings emphasize the need for balanced approaches that reconcile national interests with allied obligations to ensure sustainable regional stability.
References
Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/1968 of 17 October 2022 on a European Union Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine), Official Journal of the European Union, L 270/85, 18.10.2022, p. 85–91.
Ćurčić, M. Slađana. 2020. „Komparativna analiza strategija nacionalne bezbednosti Srbije, Crne Gore i Hrvatske”, Kultura polisa 17 (43): 259‒275.
European External Action Service. 2016. “Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe - A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy”. Brussels: Publications Office. DOI: 10.2871/9875
Forca, L. Božidar. 2018. „Prikaz- nove Strategije nacionalne bezbednosti Republike Hrvatske”, Odbrana i bezbednost. https://odbranaibezbednost.rs/2018/01/12/prikaz-nove-strategije-nacionalne-bezbednosti-republike-hrvatske/, последњи приступ: 11. 11. 2024.
Gajić, Aleksandar. 2023. „Geopolitički položaj Srbije nakon otpočinjanja rata u Ukrajini: Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje u kriznom kontekstu.”, Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 53‒74. DOI: 10.5937/spm80-44267
George, Alexander L. 1993. Forceful Persuasion: Coercive Diplomacy as an Alternative to War. Washington: US Institute for Peace Press.
George, Alexander L.; Simons, William E. 1994. The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy. Colorado – Oxford: Westview Press Inc.
Igrutinović, Milan. 2022. „Strah i ambicija: Srbija, vojna neutralnost i prošireno odvraćanje.” u zborniku: Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 39–56, Beograd: Medija centar „Odbrana”.
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under security dilemma.” World politics 30 (2):167‒214.
Kopanja, Mihajlo. 2023. „Efektivnost odvraćanja: kada je odvraćanje ʼpravaʼ strategija za ostvarivanje nacionalnih interesa.”, Srpska politička misao 80 (2): 75‒96. DOI: 10.5937/spm80-44241
Kopanja, Mihajlo i Ajzenhamer Vladimir. 2022. „Odvraćanje u raljama bezbednosne dileme.ˮ u zborniku: Neutralnost i strateško odvraćanje, ur. Veljko Blagojević, 15‒38, Beograd: Medija centar „Odbrana”.
Kovačević, Božo. 2013. „Cyberwar – američka izlika za novi Hladni rat?”, Polemos 16 (32): 91‒110.
Miladinović, Radovan i Beriša, Hatidža. 2019. „Uporedna analiza Strategija nacionalne bezbednosti Republike Srbije i Republike Hrvatske”, Vojno delo 71 (7): 114‒130. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo1907114M
Ministarstvo odbrane Crne Gore. 2019. Strategija odbrane Crne Gore i Akcioni plan za implementaciju Strategije odbrane Crne Gore. Podgorica: Ministarstvo odbrane Crne Gore.
Ministarstvo odbrane Republike Hrvatske [MORH]. 2022. Nacrt prijedloga odluke o sudjelovanju pripadnika Oružanih snaga Republike Hrvatske u misiji Europske unije za vojnu pomoć za potporu Ukrajini „EU Military Assistance Mission ‒ Ukraine“. Zagreb: Vlada Republike Hrvatske.
NАТО North Atlantic Council. 2022. NATO Strategic Concept 2022. Madrid: NATO.
Radinović, Radovan. 2003. „NATO agresija na SRJ - četiri godine posle”, Beogradski forum za svet ravnopravnih. https://web.archive.org/web/20030624082033/http://www.artel.co.yu/sr/gost/2003-06-19_1.html.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP), Official Journal of the European Union, L 185/7, 20 July 2023, p. 7–25.
Shelling, T. C. 2008. Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Strategija nacionalne sigurnosti Republike Hrvatske, „Narodne novine”, br. 32/2002.
Strategija nacionalne sigurnosti Republike Hrvatske, „Narodne novine”, br. 73/2017.
Strategija odbrane Republike Hrvatske, „Narodne novine”, br. 33/2002.
Strategija odbrane Republike Srbije, „Službeni glasnik RS”, broj 94/2019-4.
Subotić, Milovan. 2023. „Privlačenjem do odvraćanja‒problemi i mogućnosti zapadnobalkanskih država”, Srpska politička misao 82 (4): 347‒369. DOI: 10.5937/spm82-44232
Tatalović, Siniša. 2011. „Treba li Hrvatskoj nova strategija nacionalne sigurnosti”, Političke analize 2 (6): 34‒37.
Vlada Republike Hrvatske [Vlada HR]. 2022. Dnevni red 104. sjednice Vlade Republike Hrvatske. Zagreb: Vlada Republike Hrvatske.
Vlada Republike Hrvatske. 2024. Hrvatska do sada uputila vojnu pomoć Ukrajini u vrijednosti 181 milijun eura, 31. 1. 2024. Доступно на: https://vlada.gov.hr/print.aspx?id=40830&url=print, последњи приступ: 21.10.2024.
Walt, M. Stephen. 2022. “Does Anyone Still Understand The ‘Security Dilemma’?” Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/07/26/misperception-security-dilemma-ir-theory-russia-ukraine/, последњи приступ: 16. 8. 2024.
Waltz, Kenneth, N. 2010. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
