Effects of different cropping systems and weed management methods on free energy and content of pigments in maize

  • Vesna D. Dragičević Zemun Polje Maize Research Institute Slobodana Bajića 1 11185 Zemun Polje, Belgrade
  • Igor Spasojević Zemun Polje Maize Research Institute Slobodana Bajića 1 11185 Zemun Polje, Belgrade
  • Milena Simić Zemun Polje Maize Research Institute Slobodana Bajića 1 11185 Zemun Polje, Belgrade
  • Kovačević Dušan University of Belgrade Faculty of Agriculture Nemanjina 6 11080 Zemun, Belgrade
  • Milan Brankov Zemun Polje Maize Research Institute Slobodana Bajića 1 11185 Zemun Polje, Belgrade
Keywords: Weeds, Maize, Herbicides, Energy, Cropping systems, Chlorophylls, Carotenoids,

Abstract


Rotation is a cropping system that has many advantages and ensures better crop growth and yielding. Its combinination with other cropping measures can ensure optimal crop density for maximal growth and photosynthesis efficiency. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different cropping systems: monoculture and two rotations, including maize, wheat and soybean (MSW and MWS), and different weed management methods (weed removal by hoeing, application of a full recommended herbicide dose (RD) and half that dose (0.5 RD), and weedy check) on weed biomass and maize growth parameters - leaf area index (LAI), free energy, contents of chlorophyll and carotenoids, grain yield, and their possible relationships in two fields of the maize hybrids ZP 677 (H1) and ZP 606 (H2).

The lowest LAI and grain yield were found in monoculture, particularly in weedy check, which had relatively high weed infestation. Higher weed biomass was also observed in herbicide treated plots in monoculture. Such high competition pressure indicates a stress reflected on reduced LAI and chlorophyll content, and increased free energy and content of carotenoids. On the other hand, rotation, particularly if it is combined with the  application of herbicides or hoeing, had a positive impact on yielding potential by increasing LAI and the contents of chlorophyll and carotenoids, and decreasing free energy.

References

Bónis, P., Árendás, T., Marton, C.L., & Berzsenyi, Z. (2006). Herbicide tolerance of Martonvásár maize genotypes. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 54, 517-520.

Davies, D.D. (1961). Bioenergetics. In T.A. Bennet-Clark, P.B. Salt, C.H. Waddington, & V.B. Wigglesworth (Eds.), Intermediary Metabolism in Plants, Cambridge Monographs in Experimental Biology 11. (pp. 35-52). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Dolijanović, Ž., Kovačević, D., Oljača, S., Broćić, Z., & Simić, M. (2006). The yield grain of winter wheat and maize in continuous cropping, two- and three-crop rotation. Journal of Scientific Agricultural Research, 67, 81-90.

Dragičević, V., & Sredojević, S. (2011). Thermodynamics of Seed and Plant Growth. In J. Carlos Moreno Piraján (Ed.), Thermodynamics - Systems in Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH, 1-20.

Khan, M.A., Marwat, K.B., Hassan, G., & Khan, N. (2002). Impact of weed management on maize (Zea mays L.) planted at night. Pakistani Journal of Weed Science Research,

, 57-61.

Malik, A.M., Zahoor, F., Abbas, H.S., & Ansar, M. (2006). Comparative study of different herbicides for control of weeds in rainfed maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Science Society of Pakistan Abstracts, 62.

Mayfield, S.P., & Taylor, W.C. (1984). Carotenoid-deficient maize seedlings fail to accumulate light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein (LHCP) mRNA. European Journal of Biochemistry, 144(1), 79-84.

Milošev, D., Šeremešić, S., & Kurjački, I. (2008). Lisna površina i dinamika formiranja organske materije pšenice u zavisnosti od sistema ratarenja. Zbornik radova, Institut za

ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, Novi Sad, 45(II), 207-213.

Nakova, R., Baeva, G., & Nikolov, P. (2004). Competition between maize and Xanthium strumarium L. Pesticidi i fitomedicina,19(4), 257-263.

Neményi, M. (2009). Thermodynamic modelling of agroecological systems especially regarding stress in plant production. Cereal Research Communications, 37(Suppl 1), 529-532.

Riedell, W.E., Pikul, J.L., Jaradat, A.A., & Schumacher, T.E. (2009). Crop rotation and nitrogen input effects on soil fertility, maize mineral nutrition, yield, and seed composition. Agronomy Journal, 101(4), 870-879.

Saudy, H.S. (2013). Easily practicable packages for weed management in maize. African Crop Science Journal, 21(4), 291-301.

Simić, M., Dragičević, V., Srdić, J., Brankov, M., & Spasojević, I. (2013). Importance of IWMS for maize weed control. Zbornik naučnih radova Instituta PKB Agroekonomik, 19(1-2), 89-100.

Simić, M., & Stefanović, L. (2008). Kompeticija – najčešći oblik interakcije između useva i korova. Acta herbologica, 17(2), 7-21.

Stoimenova, I., Alexieva, S., Taleva, A., & Djonova, E. (2004). Biomass of maize depending on plant growth management strategies. Acta herbologica, 13(2), 401-406.

Stranger, T.F., & Lauer, J.G. (2008). Corn grain yield response to crop rotation and nitrogen over 35 years. Agronomy Journal, 100(3), 643-650.

Sun, W.Q. (2002). Methods for the Study of Water Relations under Desiccation Stress. In M. Black & H.W. Pritchard (Eds.), Desiccation and Survival in Plants: Drying Without

Dying. (pp. 47-91). New York, USA: CABI Publishing.

Wozniak, A. (2008). Wpływ zrośnicowanego udziału pszenicy jarej w zmianowaniu na indeks powierzchni liści (LAI). Acta Agrophysica, 12(1), 269-276.

Published
2014/06/30
Section
Original Scientific Paper