Hemijsko suzbijanje viline kosice u lucerki

  • Marija M Sarić-Krsmanović Institut za pesticide i zaštitu životne sredine, Banatska 31b, 11080 Beograd
  • Dragana M Božić Univerzitet u Beogradu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Beograd
  • Goran Malidža Institut za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo, Maksima Gorkog 30, 21000 Novi Sad
  • Ljiljana M Radivojević Institut za pesticide i zaštitu životne sredine, Banatska 31b, 11080 Beograd
  • Jelena S Gajić Umiljendić Institut za pesticide i zaštitu životne sredine, Banatska 31b, 11080 Beograd
  • Sava Vrbničanin Univerzitet u Beogradu, Poljoprivredni fakultet, Nemanjina 6, 11080 Beograd
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/pif.v30i2.8238
Ključne reči: Field dodder||, ||Vilina kosica, Herbicides||, ||Herbicidi, Chemical control||, ||Hemijsko suzbijanje, Alfalfa||, ||Lucerka,

Sažetak


U novije vreme problematika parazitskih cvetnica postaje sve aktuelnija i dobija veći
istraživački prostor upravo zbog njihovog širenja i sve većih šteta koje nanose u poljoprivredi. Štete koje vilina kosica pravi u usevu lucerke se prvenstveno odnose na smanjenje prinosa zelene biomase i značajno smanjenu produkciju semena kod semenske lucerke. Efikasno suzbijanje viline kosice u usevu luceke podrazumeva niz preventivnih mera i postupaka, kao i hemijsku kontrolu. Ispitivanje efikasnosti herbicida (glifosat, propizamid, imazetapir i dikvat) u suzbijanju viline kosice u usevu lucerke urađeno je tokom 2011. godine. Ogledi su izvedeni u saksijama i u polju, na oglednom polju Instituta za ratarstvo i povrtarstvo u Novom Sadu (Rimski Šančevi) i na privatnoj parceli na lokalitetu Popovići (okolina Mladenovca). U ogledu sa saksijama, najbolju efikasnost je ispoljio glifosat u obe primenjene količine (288 i 360 g a.s. ha), 95% odnosno 97.5%. Efikasnost koju je ispoljio propizamid u obe količine primene (1500 i 2000 g a.s. ha) je bila slabija (85% odnosno 87%), dok je najslabiju efikasnost ispoljio
imazetapir (150 g a.s. ha), 80%. U poljskim ogledima, na oba lokaliteta, dikvat (450 g a.s. ha) je ispoljio najbolju efikasnost u suzbijanju viline kosice. Na lokalitetu Popovići efikasnost ostalih tretmana je bila slabija, odnosno procenat preživelih jedinki viline kosice je bio: 25% (glifosat, 288 g a.s. ha), 15% (glifosat, 360 g a.s. ha), 79%  propizamid, 1500 g a.s. ha), 70% (propizamid, 2000 g a.s. ha) i 72% (imazetapir, 150 g a.s. ha). Na lokalitetu Rimski Šančevi, pri primeni istih tretmana, vilina kosica se zadržala na usevu sa oko 1%.

Biografija autora

Marija M Sarić-Krsmanović, Institut za pesticide i zaštitu životne sredine, Banatska 31b, 11080 Beograd
Laboratorija za herbologiju, naučni saradnik

Reference

Belyaeva, A.V., Cherkasova, A.P, Shapnova, L.G., & Alfomova, R.A. (1978). Maleic hydrazide aganist dodder. Sakharnaya Svekla, 23, 37-39.

Bewick, T.A., Binning, L.K. & Dana, M.N. (1988). Postattachment control of swamp dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) and carrot (Daucus carota). Weed Technology, 2(2), 166-169.

Cudney, D.W. & Lanini, W.T. (2000). Dodder. In O.C. Maloy & T.D. Murray (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Plant Pathology, Volume I (pp. 376-379). New York, NY: John Wiley

and Sons.

Cudney, D.W., Orloff, S.B., & Reints, J.S. (1992). An integrated weed management procedure for the control of dodder (Cuscuta indecora) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technology, 6(3), 603-606.

Dawson, J.H. (1989). Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) control in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with glyphosate and SC-0224. Weed Technology, 3(4), 552-559.

Dawson, J.H. (1990). Dodder (Cuscuta spp.) control in newly seeded alfalfa (Medicago sativa) with glyphosate. Weed Technology, 4(4), 880-885.

Dawson, J.H., Musselman, L.J., Wolswinkel, P. & Dörr, I. (1994). Biology and control of Cuscuta. Reviews of Weed Science, 6, 265–317.

Deng, X., Feng, H.L., Ye, W.H., Yang, Q.H., Xu, K.Y., Cao, H.L., & Fu, Q.(2003): A study on the control of exotic weed Mikania micrantha by using parasitic Cuscuta campestris. Journal Tropic and Subtropic of Botany, 11(2), 117-122.

Fer, A. (1984): Physiological approach to the chemical control of Cuscuta: Experiments with l C-labelled herbicides. In C. Parker, L. J. Musselman, R. M. Polhill & A. K. Wilson (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Parasitic Weeds (pp. 164-174). Aleppo, Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA).

Hock, S.M., Wiecko, G., & Knezevic, S.Z. (2008): Glyphosate dose affected control of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris) in the tropics. Weed Technology, 22(1), 151-155. doi:10.1614/wt-07-069.1

Jeschke, W.D., Bäumel, P., Rath, N., Czygan, F.C. & Proksch, P. (1994). Modeling of the flows and partitioning of carbon and nitrogen in the holoparasite Cuscuta reflexa Roxb. and its host Lupinus albus L. II. Flows between host and parasite and within the parasitized host. Journal of Experimental Botany, 45(6), 801-812. doi:10.1093/jxb/45.6.801

Jeschke, W.D. & Hilpert, A. (1997). Sink-stimulated photosynthesis and sink-dependent increase in nitrate uptake: nitrogen and carbon relations of the parasitic association Cuscuta reflexa-Ricinus communis. Plant Cell and Environment, 20(1), 47-56. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-2.x

Lanini, W.T. (2004): Economical Methods of Controlling Dodder in Tomatoes. Proceedings of Californian Weed Science Society, 56, 57-59.

Liao, W.B., Fan, Q., Wang, B.Z., Wang, Y.J., & Zhou, X.Y. (2002). Discovery of three species of Cuscuta harming Mikania micrantha in South China and their taxonomical identification. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 41(6), 54-56.

Mishra, J.S. (2009): Biology and management of Cuscuta species. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 41(1-2), 1-11.

Mishra, J.S., Bhan, M., Moorthy, B.T.S., & Yaduraju, N.T. (2004): Bio-efficacy of herbicides against Cuscuta in blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Indian Journal

of Weed Science, 36(3-4), 278-279.

Mullen, R.J., Orr, J.P., Viss, T.C., & Whiteley, S.W. (1998): A three year study on dodder management with rimsulfuron in processing tomato. In Proceedings of the Western Society of Weed Science, 51, 76-78.

Nadler-Hassar, T., Goldshmidt, A., Rubin, B., & Wolf, S. (2004): Glyphosate inhibits the translocation of green fluorescent protein and sucrose from a transgenic tobacco host to Cuscuta campestris Yunk. Planta (Berl.), 219(5), 790-796. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1288-4

Nadler-Hassar, T., & Rubin, B. (2003): Natural tolerance of Cuscuta campestris to herbicides inhibiting amino acid biosynthesis. Weed Research, 43(5), 341-347. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00350.x

Nir, E., Rubin, B., & Zharasov, S.W. (1996): On the biology and selective control of field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). In M.T. Moreno, J.I. Cuberu, D. Berner, D. Joel, L.J. Musselman & C. Parker (Eds), Advances in Parasitic Plant Research (pp. 809-816). Cordoba, Spain: Direccion General de Investigation Agraria.

Parker, C. & Riches, C.R. (1993). Parasitic weeds of the world: Biology and control (p 332). Wallingford, UK: Cab International.

Rubin, B. (1990). Weed competition and weed control in Allium crops. In H.D. Rabinowitch & J. L. Brewster (Eds.), Onions and Allied Crops, Vol. 2. (pp. 63-84).

Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

Rubin B (1994) Group B/2 resistant field dodder (Cuscuta campestris). Retrieved from http://www.weedscience.org/Case/Case.asp? ResistID=104 (Accessed 31 May 2010).

Shen, H., Ye, W.H., Hong, L., Cao, H.L. & Wang, Z.M. (2005). Influence of the obligate parasite Cuscuta campestris on growth and biomass allocation of its host Mikania micrantha. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56(415), 1277-1284. doi:10.1093/jxb/eri128

Shlevin, E., & Golan, D. (1982): Selective control of dodder in carrots. Phytoparasitica, 10, 267.

Stojanović, D., & Mijatović, K. (1973): Distribution, biology and control of Cuscuta spp. in Yugoslavia. In EWRS Symposium on Parasitic Weeds, Malta. EWRS: 269-279.

Stojšin, V., Marić, A., & Joćić, B. (1992): Harmfulness of Cuscuta campestris Yunck. on sugar beet under varying mineral nutrition. Zaštita bilja, 42, 357-363.

Wolswinkel, P., Ammerlaan, A., & Peters, H.F.C. (1984). Phloem unloading of amino acids at the site of attachment of Cuscuta europaea. Plant Physiology, 75(1), 13-20. doi:10.1104/pp.75.1.13

Zan, Q.J., Wang, B.S., Wang, Y.J., Zhang, J.L., Liao, W.B., & Li, M.G. (2003): The harm caused by Mikania micrantha and its control by Cuscuta campestris. Journal of Plant Ecology, 27, 822-828.

Zhang, L.Y., Ye, W.H., Cao, H.L., & Feng, H.L. (2004). Mikania micrantha H.B.K. in Chinaan over view. Weed Research, 44(1), 42-49. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.2003.00371.x

Objavljeno
2015/07/30
Kako citirati
Sarić-Krsmanović, M. M., Božić, D. M., Malidža, G., Radivojević, L. M., Gajić Umiljendić, J. S., & Vrbničanin, S. (2015). Hemijsko suzbijanje viline kosice u lucerki. Pesticides and Phytomedicine / Pesticidi I Fitomedicina, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.2298/pif.v30i2.8238
Broj časopisa
Vol. 30 Br. 2 (2015): Pesticidi i fitomedicina
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak
Autori koji objavljuju u ovom časopisu pristaju na sledeće uslove:

  1. Autori zadržavaju autorska prava i pružaju časopisu pravo prvog objavljivanja rada i licenciraju ga "Creative Commons Attribution licencom" koja omogućava drugima da dele rad, uz uslov navođenja autorstva i izvornog objavljivanja u ovom časopisu.

  2. Autori mogu izraditi zasebne, ugovorne aranžmane za neekskluzivnu distribuciju članka objavljenog u časopisu (npr. postavljanje u institucionalni repozitorijum ili objavljivanje u knjizi), uz navođenje da je članak izvorno objavljen u ovom časopisu.

  3. Autorima je dozvoljeno i podstiču se da postave objavljeni članak onlajn (npr. u institucionalni repozitorijum ili na svoju internet stranicu) pre ili tokom postupka prijave rukopisa, s obzirom da takav postupak može voditi produktivnoj razmeni ideja i ranijoj i većoj citiranosti objavljenog članka (Vidi Efekti otvorenog pristupa).