CHINA'S GEOPOLITICAL DESIGN FOR EAST ASIA: TAIWANESE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE
Abstract
China's foreign and security policy preferences for East Asia are a multifaceted issue, with Taiwan playing a crucial role in this strategic puzzle. Beijing's claim over Taiwan as its integral part is a key component of its geopolitical strategy in East Asia and an important constituent of regional security dynamics. This paper aims to delve into China's patterns of such geopolitical design for East Asia, paying particular attention on Taiwan's place within the newly introduced Indo-Pacific and attempts at multilateral alignments in the region. Author offers arguments for China’s East Asian ''regionally tailored'' policy and discusses potential strategic options ahead of Chinese leadership regarding US-led attempts to contain China geopolitically and militarily. In addition, the paper explores some Beijing's concrete military and foreign policy responses, including its military policy over the East China Sea Air Defence Identification Zone and consequences derived from recently adopted strategy titled Taiwan Issue and China's Unification in the New Era. Given Taiwan's pivotal geopolitical position in China’s security policy, the paper assumes that it will be one of the principal sites where the contest for the emerging world order will be waged between China and the United States. China's rise in the international system and the current politico-security tensions in the East Asian region as examples to argue that certain theoretical approaches, like the liberal Hegemonic Stability Theory, may no longer hold true, because international system is moving towards institutional separation into parallel entities, which could be a significant shift from the system that emerged after the Second World War.
References
ASEAN Plus Three. 2023. Areas of Cooperation, ASEAN. https://aseanplusthree.asean.org/about-apt/areas-of-cooperation>
Beeson, Mark. 2009. “Geopolitics and the making of regions: The fall and rise of East Asia” Political Studies 57(3): 498-516.
Britannica. 2023. The regions of Asia. London: Britannica Group.
Business Insider. 2022. Russia and China are brewing up a challenge to dollar dominance by creating a new reserve currency. Business Insider. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/currencies/dollar-dominance-russia-china-rouble-yuan-brics-reserve-currency-imf-2022-6>
Chen, Jian. 2019. From Mao to Deng: China’s Changing Relations with the United States, CWIHP Working Paper 92, November 2019, Washington: Wilson Center.
Chen, Yu-Jie. 2022. “One China” Contention in China–Taiwan Relations: Law, Politics and Identity” The China Quarterly 25(2): 1025-1044.
Cheng, Joseph. 2013. “China’s regional strategy and challenges in East Asia” China Perspectives 14(2): 53-65.
China Anti-Secession Law, 2005, Session of the Tenth National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China on March 14, 2005, Beijing.
Chinese MFA, 2022, 台湾问题与新时代中国统一事业 (The Taiwan Issue and China's Unification in the New Era), Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/zt_674979/dnzt_674981/qtzt/twwt/twwtbps/202208/t20220810_10738763.html>
Chinese MFA. 2023. Sino-US Joint Communiqué (excerpt) (February 28, 1972). Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/ziliao_674904/zt_674979/dnzt_674981/qtzt/twwt/zylswj/202206/t20220606_10699039.html>
Chinese MFA. 2023a. China's relationship with South Korea. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/gjhdq_676201/gj_676203/yz_676205/1206_676524/sbgx_676528/>
Cote, Owen R. 2022. “One if by invasion, two if by coercion: US military capacity to protect Taiwan from China” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 78(2): 65-72.
CSIS. 2023. South America’s ‘Common Currency’ is Actually about De-dollarization, Center for Strategic and International Studies. https://www.csis.org/analysis/south-americas-common-currency-actually-about-de-dollarization>
Danner, Lukas K. and Félix E. Martín. 2019. “China's hegemonic intentions and trajectory: Will it opt for benevolent, coercive, or Dutch‐style hegemony?” Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 6(2): 186-207.
Goh, Evelyn. 2019. “Contesting Hegemonic Order: China in East Asia” Security Studies 28(3): 614-644.
Heiduk, Felix. 2022. “Dancing with elephants: Asia and the Sino-American Rivalry” In: Asian Geopolitics and the US-China rivalry, ed. Felix Heiduk, 2-16, London: Routledge.
Holcombe, Charles. 2017. A history of East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Japanese MFA. 2023. Joint Statement between the Government of Japan and the Government of the People's Republic of China on Comprehensive Promotion of a “Mutually Beneficial Relationship Based on Common Strategic Interests”, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/china/joint0805.html>
Kastner, Scott, et al. 2022. “Taiwan and the “One-China Principle” in the Age of COVID-19: Assessing the Determinants and Limits of Chinese Influence” The China Quarterly 25(2): 1045-1065.
Kim, Min-Hyung (2023). “Hedging between the United States and China? South Korea’s ideology-driven behavior and its implications for national security” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 23(1), 129-158.
Kim, Min-Hyung. 2019. “A real driver of US–China trade conflict: The Sino–US competition for global hegemony and its implications for the future” International Trade, Politics and Development 3(1): 30-40.
Kim, Woosang and Scott Gates. 2015. “Power transition theory and the rise of China” International Area Studies Review 18(3): 219-226.
Loke, Beverley. 2021. “The United States, China, and the politics of hegemonic ordering in East Asia” International Studies Review 23(4): 1208-1229.
Okunev, Igor. 2013. “The New Dimensions of Russia's Geopolitical Code” Turkish policy quarterly 12(1): 67-75.
Potsdam Declaration [Potsdam Declaration], 1945, Proclamation Defining Terms for Japanese Surrender Issued, Potsdam, July 26, 1945.
Purwanti, Asih. 2019. “Structural Change in East Asia: Is Hegemonic Stability Theory still relevant?” Proceedings of the First Brawijaya International Conference on Social and Political Sciences, BSPACE, 26-28 November, 2019, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.
Rinehart, Ian and Bartholomew Elias. 2015. “China's Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ)”, CRS Report R43894, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Scobell, Andrew. 2000. Chinese Army Building in the Era of Jiang Zemin. Carlisle Barracks Pennsylvania: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
Smith, Paul J. 2009. “China-Japan relations and the future geopolitics of East Asia” Asian Affairs: An American Review 35(4): 230-256.
Stekić, Nenad Z. Vojne intervencije i postkonfliktna izgradnja države u eri unipolarnosti: slučaj Savezne Republike Jugoslavije, Avganistana i Iraka. Diss. Univerzitet u Beogradu-Fakultet bezbednosti, 2021.
Sullivan, Patricia and Michael T. Koch. 2009. “Military intervention by powerful states, 1945—2003” Journal of Peace Research 46(5): 707-718.
Taiwan ADIZ Violations Dataset, 2023, ROC Ministry of National Defense, Compiled by: Gerald C. Brown, Ben Lewis
Taiwan News, 2023, Output value of Taiwan’s semiconductor sector logged US$115 billion in 2020, Taiwan News. https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4133393>
US Census Bureau. 2023. Trade in Goods with Japan, https://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5880.html>
Watanabe, Atsuko. 2018. “Greater East Asia Geopolitics and its geopolitical imagination of a borderless world: A neglected tradition?” Political Geography 67(1): 23-31.
Yahuda, Michael. 1993. “Deng Xiaoping: the statesman” The China Quarterly 13(5): 551-572.
Yan, Niva Yau Tsz. 2022. “Central Asia and China's Taiwan Dilemma”. FPRI. https://www.fpri.org/article/2022/09/central-asia-and-chinas-taiwan-dilemma>
