THE POTENTIAL OF THE ANTI-HEGEMONIC COALITION
Abstract
The authors consider the potential of a loose coalition in curbing US global influence, ie. the implications of its formation and strengthening on the final establishment of multipolarity. Based on the view that international relations are increasingly defined by multipolarity and that the opposition is increasingly speaking out against yesterday's hegemon, the authors point out that the US insists on an increasingly harsh global polarization, while Russia and China strive to initiate global “de-dollarization” mechanisms. The joining of African and Middle Eastern countries to the anti-American bloc initiates international processes that potentially lead to the strengthening of existing and the formation of new units of collective security. After a period of soft balancing of US power, in the period from the coming to power of the Putin administration until the conflict in Georgia in 2008, the Russian Federation began an era of hard balancing, and the conflicts in Syria and the current one in Ukraine are the best indicators. By intervening in Syria, Russia secured the supply of its own gas to Europe and regained its international reputation, while by launching military operations in Ukraine, it rejected immediate military threats to NATO from its borders. The balance of power is currently emerging as the most realistic concept of international relations, although Russia and China are waiting for the moment when the inevitability of economic growth will change the balance of power in their favor.
References
Глишин Вања, (2019) Балканска геополитичка парадигма: Балкан у геополитичкој визури великих сила, „Каирос”, Сремски Карловци.
Ковач Митар, Стојановић Станислав, (2022). Увод у стратегију, „Медија центар Одбрана”, Београд.
Обрадовић Зоран, 2021, Геополитичко позиционирање Руске Федерације након интервенције у Сирији (докторска дисертација, Факултет безбедности у Београду,).
Политика, Без консензуса, чланство Украјине у НАТО-у на чекању. Преузето 5.2.2024. године са https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/557142/nato-ukrajina-bez-konsenzusa.
Филимоновић Миљан (2010), Спољна политика Руске Федерације, Београд, Инфинитас.
Филимоновић Миљан (2016), Концепт новог европског безбедносног поретка у спољној политици Русије на почетку 21. века (докторска дисертација, Факултет политичких наука у Београду).
Форца Божидар (2021), Системи безбедности. Београд, Факултет за пословне студије и право.
Форца Божидар (2023), Национална безбедност и одбрана. Београд: Универзитет „Унион Никола Тесла” факултет за пословне студије и право.
Форца Божидар, Спојени судови: паљење линаја ватре, Одбрана и безбедност, интернет: https://odbranaibezbednost.rs/2020/10/12/spojeni-sudovi-paljenje-linija-vatre/. Преузето 05. 02. 2024.
Freedman Robert (1998), Russia s Middle East Ambitions, Middle East Quarterly, преузето 19.1.2024. године са http://www.meforum.org/article/405.
Fukuyama Francis, (1992). The End of History and the Last Man, New York: Free Press.
Hamilton Robert, (2020). Implications For the West. Russia war in Syria, Foreign policy research institute.
Leon, Aron. (2006), U.S.-Russia Relations Through the Prism of Ideology, Russia in Global Affairs, Vol. 4, No.3, jul-Sep.2006, p.84.
National Security Concept of the Russian Federation, internet http://www.russiaeurope.mid.ru/russiastrat2000.html. Pristupljeno 31.1.2024. god.
National Security Strategy of the USA, The White House, August 1, 1991, Washington, Preface.
Reuters, Spain, Italy, France Decline US Command of Red Sea Operation Prosperity Guardian, преузето 6.2.2024. године: https://gcaptain.com/shipping-industry-in-the-dark-over-red-sea-naval-coalition/.
Stanisavljević Nenad, (2017), Put svile – projekat koji menja 21. vek, Balkan magazin –sajt:http://www.balkanmagazin.net/novosti-i-politika/cid128-160220/put-svile-projekat-koji-menja-21vek, pristupljeno 30.1.2024. godine.
Vukadinović Radovan, Čehulić Lidija, Božinović Davor, (2007). NATO euroatlantistička integracija, Topical, Zagreb.