RETURN OF COMPULSORY MILITARY SERVICE IN EUROPE: SOCIAL DETERMINISM AND PERSPECTIVES

  • Srđan Starčević University of Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy
Keywords: conscription, military service, nation-state, globalization, technologization, consumer society, professional armed forces

Abstract


In the period between 1995 and 2012, a number of European countries suspended mandatory military service upon which European national standing armies were based, from the 19th to the end of the 20th century. The Second Crimean crisis, which yielded the renewed perception of Russia as a threat to the West, caused a narrative shift regarding military organization in Europe placing public expression of concern for efficiency of its military and its deterrence capability on the public agenda.  

The subject of this paper is the analysis of social facts that obstruct political decision-making on military conscription in European societies or hinder the process of reinstating mandatory military service in European countries. The aim is to point out the social determinisms that discourage the introduction of mandatory military service in Europe while favouring the professional military as the basic type of military organization of modern European societies with private military companies as its “subcontractors” and auxiliary forces. The hypothesis proven by the paper is that social changes that took place at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century shaped modern European societies using dominant social values in contrast to the social values traditionally implied by mandatory military service and conscription. Zygmunt Bauman's theory of fluid modernity was used for the purposes of the paper, supplemented with Giovanni Sartori's theoretical considerations on the rights-claiming society. Hypothetical-deductive and historical-comparative methods were used in the paper.

The introduction explains the conditions under which mandatory military service was introduced in European countries as well as the criticism it faced previous to its suspension. The first chapter is devoted to the analysis of the reasons for reintroducing mandatory military service. In the second chapter, the social facts that resist the return of mandatory military service are analysed. These facts include: decline of power of nation states and redefinition of the concept of sovereignty during globalization, the rise of a type of society that can be called consumerist, atomized, and rights-claiming society, and the shaping of culture with a hedonistic cultural strategy. Social values of modern society are in contrast to social values on which conscription societies counted on: supremacy of the collective over the individual, disciplined repetition of routines, awareness of continuance of the nation as a higher form of shared existence for which a certain absence of comfort must be endured, along with the willingness to make personal sacrifices for the common good.

Based on historical experience, the multipolar world will be a world of military competition and it is expected that many countries will attempt to reintroduce conscription. States which are able to convince their citizens that the danger to the country’s freedom is realistic, will introduce this obligation provided that it takes a looser form than the one that was in force in the last century. Those countries that have suspended the obligation to serve in the military and wish to restore it but fail to convince their citizens of the reality of the threat, will face clear discontent of their citizens.

Author Biography

Srđan Starčević, University of Defence in Belgrade, Military Academy
Department of Social Sciences of the Military Academy

References

Вуксановић–Анић, Драга. 1993. Стварање модерне српске војске. Београд: Српска књижевна задруга, Војноиздавачки и новински центар.

Диркем, Емил. 1972. О подели друштвеног рада. Београд: Просвета.

Ђукић, Слобода. 2019. Страни утицај на развој српске војне доктрине у XIX и првој деценији XX века. Београд: МЦ „Одбранаˮ.

Кајтез, Илија, и Срђан Старчевић. 2023. „Оправданост војне неутралности Републике Србије у времену ерозије неутралности у Европи”. Српска политичка мисао 82 (4): 327–345. doi: 10.5937/spm82-46850.

Павловић, Тодор. 1909. Друштвени развитак и војска, еволуција војне дисциплине. Београд: Нова штампарија „Давидовић”.

Политика. 2023. „Њузвик: Американци више не желе да се боре ѕа своју земљуˮ. 12. новембар 2023. https://www.politika.rs/scc/clanak/583660/Njuzvik-Amerikanci-vise-ne-zele-da-se-bore-za-svoju-zemlju.

Старчевић, Срђан, и Илија Кајтез. 2018. „Берков допринос проучавању војске као друштвене институцијеˮ. Теме г. XLII (3): 779-797. doi: 10.22190/ТЕМЕ1803779S.

Старчевић, Срђан, и Срђан Благојевић. 2023. „Служење војног рока као део друштвеног идеала у Србијиˮ. Српска политичка мисао 80 (2): 33–51. doi: 10.5937/spm80-44254.

Старчевић, Срђан. 2020. Револуција и легитимност. Београд: Чигоја штампа.

Старчевић, Срђан. 2022а. „Утицај различитих културних стратегија на пожељност војног позиваˮ. Политикологија 2 (2): 63–75.

Старчевић, Срђан. 2022б. Социологија. Београд: Медија центар „Одбранаˮ.

Bauman, Zigmunt. 2009. Fluidni život. Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.

Bauman, Zigmunt. 2010. Fluidni strah. Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.

Bauman, Zigmunt. 2018. Stranci pred našim vratima. Novi Sad: Mediterran publishing.

Bove, Vincenzo, Di Leo, Riccardo, and Marco Giani. 2022. „Military Culture and Institutional Trust: Evidence from Conscription Reforms in Europeˮ. American Journal of Political Science 00 (00): 1–16. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12745.

Gidens, Entoni. 2001. Sociologija. Podgorica: CID.

Hjum, Dejvid. 2008. Politički eseji. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Hobsbaum, Erik. 2008. Globalizacija, demokratija i terorizam. Beograd: Arhipelag.

Itsik, Ronen. 2020. „Compulsory military service as a social integrator.” Security and Defence Quarterly 30 (3): 65–80. doi: 10.35467/sdq/124710.

Kaarkoski, Miina, and Teemu Häkkinen. 2022. „The Legitimacy of Conscription in Democracy: Connections between Conscription Politics and Public Opinion in Parliamentary Debates in Finland and Sweden in the 2010sˮ. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 49 (2): 195–2018. doi: 10.5744/jpms.2022.2004.

Kastels, Manuel. 2018. Mreže revolta i nade. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Mićunović, Dragoljub. 2018. Demokratija, populizam, entropija. Beograd: Arhipelag.

Pečujlić, Miroslav. Globalizacija, dva lika sveta. Beograd: Gutembergova galaksija.

Pokrajac, Slobodan. 2004. Tehnologizacija i globalizacija. Beograd: SDPublik.

Sartori, Đovani. 2001. Demokratija, šta je to? Podgorica: CID.

Shane, Leo III. 2022. „Sluggish military recruiting worries Congressˮ. Military Times https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2022/04/27/sluggish-military-recruiting-worries-congress/

Stanar, Dragan. 2020. „Paramilitary Organizations and Private Military Companies in War: How to Restrain What You Do Not Control?ˮ In: Jus Post Bellum: Restraint, Stabilisation and Peace, ed. Patrik Mileham, 362–387. Leiden/Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

Starčević Srđan, and Dragan Stanar. 2022. „Society of right claiming and transformation of war and military at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21th century”. In: From childhood to the right to a dignified old age, Human rights and institutions, Yearbook Human Rights Protection (3), ed. Zoran Pavlović, 153–167. Novi Sad: Provincial Protector of Citizens – Ombudsman, Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research.

Strand, Sanna. 2021. „The 'Scandinavian model' of military conscription: a formula for democratic defence forces in 21st century Europe?ˮ. Policy Analysis 5: 1–12. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-77365-1.

Todorović, Aleksandar Luj. 2017. Diskurs novih tehnologija. Beograd: Clio.

Tresch, Tibor S. 2018. „Challenges in recruitment and retention is there a solution?ˮ. Contemporary Military Challenges 20 (2): 19–21.

Turen, Alen. 2011. Nova paradigma. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Urych, Ilona, and Grzegorz Matysaik. 2022. „Preparing youth for defence: Socialization, education, and training of young people in Europe for national security.ˮ Security and Defence Quarterly 38 (2): 1–15. doi: 10.35467/sdq/149891.

Yale University. 2017. „John J. Mearsheimer. The Roots of Liberal Hegemonyˮ. Youtube. 22. 11. 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSj__Vo1pOU&t=524s

Published
2024/06/04
Section
Original scientific paper