CHALLENGES OF THE MILITARY NEUTRALITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IN A CHANGED SECURITY ENVIRONMENT
Abstract
The war in Ukraine has caused significant changes in the security environment of the Republic of Serbia. Following Russia's military intervention in Ukraine, relations between the West and Russia have reached the level of open political and economic conflict, with the dangerous potential for such a confrontation to escalate into military and nuclear confrontation. Russia has been subjected to unprecedented, comprehensive sanctions. The geopolitical conflict between the West and the Russian Federation has also caused significant changes in the security and defence policies of the European Union and NATO member states, significant increases in their military budgets, the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO, a historic increase in NATO’s military presence on its eastern borders, and significant military, humanitarian, and financial assistance to Ukraine's war efforts. In the energy sector, the process of energy “De-Russificationˮ of Europe is in its final stages. Smaller European countries still importing Russian oil and gas will be forced to rapidly diversify their supplies to mitigate the potential economic consequences of interrupting Russian oil and gas imports. The war in Ukraine initiated and intensified a tectonic process of political, security, and economic realignment in Europe and the world, as a result of which the military neutrality of the Republic of Serbia was exposed to serious pressure from key international actors to side with one of the parties in the aforementioned conflict. The military neutrality of the Republic of Serbia represents a legitimate security and defense option. However, the uncertainties regarding the legitimacy of the military neutrality of the Republic of Serbia create space for exerting political, security, and economic pressure because this important defense interest is conditioned by the vital national interests of the Republic of Serbia, in particular the aspiration towards membership in the European Union, the preservation of territorial integrity, as well as the preservation of energy security. The war in Ukraine has caused a deterioration in Serbia’s geopolitical position, which has been exploited in the process of aggravating relations and escalating the conflict between Belgrade and Pristina to establish firm political and security control over the territory and the local Serbian population and gradually abolish the remaining elements of Serbian institutions in the north of Kosovo and Metohija. At the same time, the “stabilization” of the situation in Kosovo and Metohija significantly reduces Russia's ability to use the "Kosovo precedent" to justify military intervention in Ukraine. On the other hand, the escalation of the conflict between the West and the Russian Federation in the energy sector seriously threatens Serbia's energy security, as it has limited possibilities to diversify its supply relatively quickly. The recent introduction of sanctions against the company “NIS” represents one of the biggest challenges to the energy security of the Republic of Serbia. However, the persistent refusal to impose sanctions on the Russian Federation may negatively affect Serbia's European and economic prospects, given the level of foreign trade with the European Union. On the other hand, the Republic of Serbia is making obvious efforts to preserve its status of military neutrality by politically balancing between the warring parties. The war in Ukraine is turning into a protracted armed conflict of attrition. In this new, global, and exhausting “war of materials” and the tightening of political, security, and economic relations, the Republic of Serbia will have a challenging and complicated foreign policy position, given its persistent efforts to maintain good relations with the West, but also with the Russian Federation, which is integral to its policy of military neutrality. One of the key problems of the sustainability of Serbia’s military neutrality is its connection with the issues of preserving Kosovo and Metohija and the prospect of membership in the European Union, vital national interests that, in the tense geopolitical circumstances, can hardly be reconciled. On the other hand, any alignment or non-alignment about sanctions against the Russian Federation will have serious consequences, both for resolving the problem of Kosovo and Metohija and for the energy and economic security of the Republic of Serbia. The research methodology is based on the analysis of relevant sources and literature.
References
Anđelković, Nataša. 2022. „Srbija, Rusija i politika: Da li je Putin promenio stav o Kosovu ili ga koristi kao ‛čip za trgovinu’ sa Zapadom.” BBC News na srpskom. 29. april 2022. https://www.bbc.com/serbian/lat/balkan-61269772.
Antezza, Arianna, Katelyn Bushnell, André Frank, Pascal Frank, Lukas Franz, Ivan Kharitonov, Ekaterina Kumar B. Rebinskaya, Christoph Trebesch, Stefan Schramm. 2024. “The Ukraine Support Tracker data.” Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Last accessed January 21, 2025. https://www.ifw-kiel.de/publications/ukraine-support-tracker-data-20758/.
Barišić, Igor. 2024. „Asimetrično ugrožavanje bezbednosti Republike Srbije – teorijski okvir za analizu problema na Kosovu i Metohiji.ˮ Politika nacionalne bezbednosti 26 (1): 83–103. DOI: 10.5937/pnb26-50171.
Belkin Paul. 2022. “Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: NATO Response.” Congressional Research Service. Last accessed November 1, 2022. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11866.
Besch, Sophia, and Sarah Brockmeier. 2022. “Waking a Sleeping Giant: What's next for German Security Policy?ˮ War on the Rocks. March 9, 2022. https://warontherocks.com/2022/03/waking-a-sleeping-giant-whats-next-for-german-security-policy/.
Božić Talijan, Elena. 2022. „Šta nas očekuje? Da li odluka Brisela o embargu na uvoz ruske nafte do kraja 2022. utiče na snabdevanje Srbije.” Novosti. 1. jun 2022. https://www.novosti.rs/ekonomija/vesti/1121963/sta-nas-ocekuje-odluka-brisela-embargu-uvoz-ruske-nafte-kraja-2022-utice-snabdevanje-srbije.
Castellum.AI. 2025. “Russia Sanctions Dashboard.” Castellum.AI. January 19, 2025. https://www.castellum.ai/russia-sanctions-dashboard.
Council of the European Union [Council EU]. 2024. “EU sanctions against Russia explained.” Council of the European Union. December 16, 2024. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/sanctions-against-russia-explained/.
Danas. 2022. „Srbija glasala za izbacivanje Rusije iz Saveta UN za ljudska prava.” Danas. 7. April 2022. https://www.danas.rs/svet/srbija-glasala-za-izbacivanje-rusije-iz-saveta-un-za-ljudska-prava/.
Deutsche Welle [DW]. 2022. „Borelj za Dojče vele: Sada je kritičan trenutak za proces proširenja.” Radio Televizija Srbije. 18. mart 2022. https://www.rts.rs/page/stories/sr/story/10/svet/4741602/zosep-borelj-prosirenje-eu.html.
Eurostat. 2024. “EU trade with Russia - latest developments.” Last accessed November 21, 2024. Eurostat. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?oldid=558089#Latest_developments.
European Commission [EC]. 2024. “State of the Energy Union Report 2024.” European Commission. September 11, 2024. https://energy.ec.europa.eu/publications/state-energy-union-report-2024_en.
Fischer, Thomas. 2013. “Switzerland: Invention of Permanent Neutrality.” ISAC Fond. Last accessed November 21, 2024. https://www.isac-fund.org/download/NEUTRALNOST-ENG-F-2WEB.pdf.
Frischenschlager, Friedhelm. 2013. “Austria´s “Permanent Neutrality” after 1955 – a Model for Serbia?” ISAC Fond. Last accessed November 21, 2024. https://www.isac-fund.org/download/NEUTRALNOST-ENG-F-2WEB.pdf.
Ingallinella, Laura. 2020. “The Hottest Place in Hell: Neutrality and the Politicization of Dante in the United States.” Laura Ingallinella. June 8, 2020. https://lauraingallinella.org/2020/06/08/hottest-place-in-hell-dante-neutrality/.
International Crisis Group [ICG]. 2024a. “Northern Kosovo: Asserting Sovereignty amid Divided Loyalties.” International Crisis Group. April 2, 2024. https://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/balkans/kosovo/269-northern-kosovo-asserting-sovereignty-amid-divided-loyalties.
International Crisis Group [ICG]. 2024b. “Helping Keep Bosnia and Herzegovina Together.” May 23, 2024. Last accessed 20 February 2025. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.crisisgroup.org/sites/default/files/2024-05/wl-2024-spring-bosnia.pdf.
International Institute for Strategic Studies [IISS]. 2024. The Armed Conflict Survey 2024. London: Routledge.
Joseph, Edward, Branislav Radeljic, Lulzim Peci, Iulia Joja, Jan Cingel, and Sarria Pol Vila. 2022. “From Crisis to Convergence: A Strategy to Tackle Instability in the Balkans at its Source.” Foreign Policy Institute and Wilson Center's Global Europe Program. January 18, 2022. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/crisis-convergence-strategy-tackle-balkans-instability-its-source.
Kuçi, Gurakuç. 2024. “Russia’s Hybrid Warfare in the Western Balkans: Geopolitical Strategies and Proxy Actors.” Special Issue, OCTOPUS Journal: Hybrid Warfare & Strategic Conflicts: 1–27. DOI: 10.69921/29031991.
Lomas, Natasha. 2022. “EU’s ban on Russia Today and Sputnik is now in effect.” TechCrunch. March 2, 2022. https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/02/eu-rt-sputnik-ban-live/.
Lopatka, Jan. 2024. “Czechs not looking to extend the waiver for Russian-based oil products.ˮ Reuters. November 22, 2024. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/czechs-not-looking-extend-waiver-russian-based-oil-products-2024-11-22/.
Marić, Dunja. 2022. „Dva scenarija za rešenje naftne krize u Srbiji: Prodaja NIS ili slovački model.ˮ Nova.rs. 5. maj 2022. https://nova.rs/vesti/biznis/dva-scenarija-za-resenje-naftne-krize-u-srbiji-prodaja-nis-ili-slovacki-model/.
McWilliams Ben, Giovanni Sgaravatti, Simone Tagliapietra, and Georg Zachmann. 2024. “The European Union – Russia energy divorce: state of play.ˮ Bruegel. February 22, 2024. https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/european-union-russia-energy-divorce-state-play.
NIN. 2025. „SAD uvele sankcije NIS-u: Traže potpuni izlazak ruskog interesa iz kompanije.ˮ NIN. 10. januar 2025. https://www.nin.rs/ekonomija/vesti/65953/uvedene-sankcije-nis-u.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]. 2022a. “Statement by NATO Heads of State and Government.” North Atlantic Treaty Organization. March 24, 2022. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_193719.htm.
North Atlantic Treaty Organization [NATO]. 2022b. “NATO’s Eastern Flank: stronger Defence and Deterrence – Map.” North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Last accessed January 18, 2024. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/3/pdf/2203-map-det-def-east.pdf.
Republički zavod za statistiku [RZS]. 2022. „Spoljnotrgovinska robna razmena, za april 2022.ˮ Republički zavod za statistiku. 31. maj 2022. https://www.stat.gov.rs/sr-latn/vesti/20220531-spoljnotrgovinska-robna-razmena-za-april-2022/?s=1701.
Reuters. 2025. “Moscow says Ukraine tried to attack TurkStream pipeline infrastructure in Russia.ˮ Reuters. January 13, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-tried-attack-turkstream-pipeline-infrastructure-southern-russia-moscow-2025-01-13/.
Rezolucija Narodnе Skupštinе Republike Srbije o zaštiti suvereniteta, teritorijalnog integriteta i ustavnog poretka Republike Srbije [Rezolucija NS RS], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 125/2007.
Salonius-Pasternak, Charly. 2013. “Finland - From a Buffer Zone to an EU member state.” ISAC Fond. Last accessed November 21, 2024. https://www.isac-fund.org/download/NEUTRALNOST-ENG-F-2WEB.pdf.
Soldatkin, Vladimir, and Dan Peleschuk. 2025. “Russian gas era in Europe ends as Ukraine stops transit.” Reuters. January 1, 2025. https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russia-halts-gas-exports-europe-via-ukraine-2025-01-01/.
Solli, Per Erik, and Øystein Solvang. 2022. “Finland and Sweden’s Path Towards NATO.” Royal United Services Institute. April 13, 2022. https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/finland-and-swedens-path-towards-nato.
S&P Global Market Intelligence [S&P GMI]. 2024. “Sanctions against Russia – a timeline.” S&P Global Market Intelligence. November 8, 2024. https://www.spglobal.com/market-intelligence/en/news-insights/articles/2024/11/sanctions-against-russia-8211-a-timeline-69602559.
Stojanović, Stanislav. 2020. „Savremena strateška kultura i neutralnost.” Vojno delo 72(4): 210–233. DOI: 10.5937/vojdelo2004210S.
Strategija nacionalne bezbednosti Republike Srbije [SNB RS], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 94/2019.
Strategija odbrane Republike Srbije [SO RS], „Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 94/2019.
Thompson, Mark. 2022. “Britain bans Russian state TV channel RT.” CNN Business. March 18, 2022. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/18/media/uk-bans-russia-rt-tv/index.html.
US Department of Defense [US DoD]. 2022. “Fact Sheet: Posture Updates in Support of Allies in Europe.” US Department of Defense. February 2, 2022. https://media.defense.gov/2022/Feb/02/2002931655/-1/-1/0/EUROPE-POSTURE-UPDATES-FACT-SHEET.PDF.
Vlada Republike Srbije [VRS], Eneregetski bilans Republike Srbije za 2024. godinu „Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 8/2024.
Vukičević, Jasna. 2022. „Ruski napad na Ukrajinu sve mijenja u Evropi.” Radio Slobodna Evropa. 24. februar 2022. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/crna-gora-ukrajina-rusija/31721213.html.
Vuksic, Spenser. 2025. “Sanctions Year in Review: How Sanctions Changed in 17 Charts.” Castellum.AI. Last accessed January 21, 2025. https://www.castellum.ai/insights/2024-sanctions-year-in-review.
