PANDEMIZATION AND THE NEW NORMAL
Abstract
The paper investigates the phenomenon of a declared pandemic and the processes that take place within such a situation. It's about processes in education, culture, economy and social life in general. Those processes could not have happened if the pandemic had not been declared. It can be said that we are living in a turning point that should establish a new state of affairs in public and private life. That new state of affairs actually implies a new paradigm that represents a kind of refeudalization in terms of various parameters related to significant denial of various rights and freedoms. The new paradigm includes a significant degree of control, ie. various forms of supervision and forced medical treatments. The new state of affairs has its own slogans such as “social distancing”, ”new normal“, “digitalization”, etc. Those slogans are contrasted with the slogans of freedom, equality and fraternity that marked the creation of civil society during the French Revolution.
The declaration of a pandemic enabled the introduction of restrictive measures that go beyond medicine and primarily relate to basic human rights and freedoms. In this way, from the sphere of medicine it entered to the sphere of philosophy, sociology, politics and other areas of human social practice. Propaganda has produced a situation in which it has made fear a desirable state of affairs. Those who were not afraid, as a rule, were declared non-solidarity and irresponsible persons who endanger other people, the health system, the functioning of the state, etc. People agreed to the measures either out of primal existential fear or out of fear of punishment if they do not respect the measures. Deconstruction of the so-called old normal would also represent the deconstruction of the existing civil society and the establishment of some kind of new totalitarianism.
The articles of recognized scientists, such as Kary Mullis, Luc Montagnier, John Ioannidis, etc., if they did not fit into the given matrix, were either ignored or declared unscientific.
It could be argued that the declared pandemic was primarily a political project. Its factual ending also testifies to this. Pandemization entered a stand-by state when the Russian special military operation on the territory of Ukraine began in February 2022.
References
Аранђеловић, Вишња. 2020. „Ближи нам се сценарио из Италије и Шпаније.” Политика, 1. април.
Видојевић, Зоран. 2015. Порази и алтернативе, претња пустоши и етика отпора. Београд: Завод за уџбенике.
Видојевић, Зоран. 2018. Живот један једини. Београд: Јасен
Вујић, Тања. 2020. „Форум из Давоса повео битку против вируса корона.” Политика, 13. март.
Галовић, Милан. 2020. „Дроном на вирус.” Политика, 27. март.
Давидов Кесар, Данијела. 2020. „По помоћ у ковид амбуланте.” Политика, 3. април.
Давидов Кесар, Данијела. 2020а. „СЗО тражи од држава да нападну корону.” Политика, 27. март.
Дугалић, Мирољуб. 2020. „Дроновима против вируса.” Политика, 13. април.
Каваја, Јелена. 2020. „Хокејом и тракторима на вирус корона.” Политика, 1. април.
Каваја, Јелена. 2020а. „Прати ли се вирус или човек.” Политика, 21. април.
Лаушевић, Саво. 2022. „Корона криза, пут у глобалну биомоћ.” У Патриотизам у доба пандемије, ур. Александар Лукић, 9–26. Београд: Институт за политичке студије, Српско филозофско друштво.
Лукић, Александар, и Валентина Арсић Арсенијевић. 2023. „Логика и научни метод ‒ вирус и мозаичка болест дувана, шта знамо о инфективним агенсима.” Sociološki pregled 57 (1): 297–321. DOI: 10.5937/socpreg57-41592.
C-Span. 2020. “World Health Organization Coronavirus News Conference.” C-Span. 23 March. https://www.c-span.org/video/?470606-1/world-health-organization-coronavirus-news-conference.
Čolaković, Božidar, i Zorica Perošević. 1986. Opšta i specijalna epidemiologija. Priština: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Fric, Martini. 1971. Istorija nemačke književnosti. Beograd: Nolit.
Ioannidis, John A. 2021. “Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of Covid-19: An overview of systematic evaluations.” European journal of clinical investigation 51 (5): 1–13. DOI: 10.1111/eci.13554
Krauč, Kolin. 2014. Postdemokratija. Šabac: Karpos.
Lukić, Aleksandar. 2022. „Logičko-ontološki aspekti pandemije.” Theoria 65 (4): 169–177, doi: 10.2298/THEO2204169L.
Melnick, Edward R, and John Ioannidis. 2020. “Should governments continue lockdown to slow the spread of covid-19?” BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 369: 1–3. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1924.
Mullis, Kary. 2021. “Kary Mullis: The Full Interview by Gary Null.” YouTube, 3 August. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezKMYTvjEfw.
Mullis, Kary, and Michael Smith. n.d. “Kary B. Mullis – Facts.” The Nobel Prize. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1993/mullis/facts/.
Nicola, Maria at al. 2020. “The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (Covid-19): A review.” International journal of surgery 78: 185–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018.
Perez, Jean Claude, and Luc Montagnier. 2020. “Сovid-19, sars and bats coronaviruses genomes peculiar homologous rna sequences.” International Journal of Research –Granthaalayah 8 (7): 217–63. DOI: 10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i7.2020.678.
Schwab, Klaus and Malleret, Thierry. 2020. Covid-19: the great reset. Geneva: Forum publishing.