STRATEGIES OF LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE REGION OF AP VOJVODINA - PARTICIPATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN CREATING STRATEGIES

  • Vanja Glišin Institut za političke studije
  • Veran Stančetić Faculty of Political Sciences, University of Belgrade
  • Aleksandar Matković Faculty of European Legal and Political Studies, Belgrade
Keywords: sustainable development, participation, e-democracy, youth, AP Vojvodina, strategic planning

Abstract


The key issue of this paper is the scope of municipalities and cities of AP Vojvodina in the participation of citizens when planning local sustainable development. To find an answer to this question, the importance of sustainable development is explained first, its local dimension next, as well as the necessity of citizen participation (electronic and traditional). Then, a "surface" segment of the analysis was performed – the state of local strategies in the APV area (their existence and public availability) is analyzed, ie the tendency of municipalities and cities of Vojvodina towards strategic management and sustainable development. The second segment of the analysis is deepened, focusing on the real involvement of citizens in the creation and implementation of local development documents, with a special focus on young people (15–25 years of age) and their views on these issues. The paper presents the research findings, i.e. the perception of young people when it comes to involvement in local affairs, sustainable development, and participation in general. Although we live in an information age in which there are technological, but also formal and legal conditions for citizen participation, it is still assessed as insufficient. Therefore, the paper elaborates on the reasons for this situation and offers guidelines for improving this area. Primary and secondary sources were used in the paper. By analyzing the documents, we obtained data related to the research subject. It is primarily a qualitative analysis of primary data sources, but also an analysis of domestic and foreign relevant literature. Along with empirical research, an analysis of existing studies in this area was performed. Therefore, the method of analysis (descriptive and explanatory analysis) and the method of synthesis were used, to understand the complex whole based on the described and explained basic concepts and processes.

References

Ђорђевић, Снежана. 2023. „Примена ИТ у јавном сектору од стране локалних власти – користи и изазови.” Српска политичка мисао 81 (3): 7–27. DOI: 10.5937/spm81-45234.

Закон о локалној самоуправи, „Службени гласник Републике Србије”, бр. 129/2007, 83/2014 - др. закон, 101/2016 - др. закон и 47/2018.

Миленковић, Дејан, и Агатина Петровић. 2023. „Институционални оквир организовања младих у јединицама локалне самоуправе у Републици Србији.” Српска политичка мисао 81 (3): 51–75. DOI: 10.5937/spm81-45344.

Пешић, Михајло. 1999. Социологија. Београд: Институт за политичке студије.

Ali, Muhammad. 2023. “E-governance and E-democracy: a Digital Revolution.” Social Science Research Network. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4623414.

Bekemans, Leonce. 2018. “Citizens’ Participation and Participatory Governance in the EU.” Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs, 4: 47–70.

Berg, Sebastian, and Jeanette Hofmann. 2021. “Digital Democracy.” Internet Policy Review 10 (4): 1–23. DOI: 10.14763/2021.4.1612.

Burford, Gemma, Elona Hoover, Ismael Velasco, Svatava Janoušková, Alicia Jimenez, Georgia Piggot, Dimity Podger, and Marie Harder. 2013. “Bringing the ‘Missing Pillar’ into Sustainable Development Goals: Towards Intersubjective Values-Based Indicators.” Sustainability 5 (7): 3035–3059. DOI: 10.3390/su5073035.

Council of Europe. 2008. “Strategy for Innovation and Good Governance at Local Level.” Councile of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/1680746f16.

Conaway, Will. 2020. “Technology Is on The Rise, While IQ Is on The Decline.” Forbes. April 29. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2020/04/29/technology-is-on-the-rise-while-iq-is-on-the-decline/?sh=1b41f5b9b103.

Damjanović, Mijat. 1990. Menadžerska revolucija - stanje i perspektiva teorije organizacije i teorije upravljanja. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

De Blasio, Emiliana, and Michele Sorice. 2019. “E-Democracy and Digital Activism: From Divergent Paths Toward a New Frame.” International Journal of Communication 13: 5715–5733.

Despotović, Ljubiša, i Vanja Glišin. 2021. Savremeni međunarodni odnosi i geopolitika. Sremski Karlovci: Kairos.

Despotović, Ljubiša, and Vanja Glišin. 2023a. “Geopolitics of Health: Subdisciplinary research of medical science and health systems manipulations in the context of geopolitics as a synthetic science.” Culture of Polis 20 (1): 1–15. DOI: 10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.1r.1dg.

Despotović, Ljubiša, and Vanja Glišin. 2023b. “Geopolitics of Health and the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Kultura Polisa 20 (3): 1–26. DOI: 10.51738/Kpolisa2023.20.3r.1dg.

Dockrill, Peter. 2018. “IQ Scores Are Falling in ‘Worrying’ Reversal of 20th Century Intelligence Boom.” ScienceAlert, June 13. https://www.sciencealert.com/iq-scores-falling-in-worrying-reversal-20th-century-intelligence-boom-flynn-effect-intelligence.

Driscoll, James W. 1978. “Trust and Participation in Organizational Decision Making as Predictors of Satisfaction.” Academy of Management Journal 21 (1): 44–56. DOI: 10.5465/255661.

Go Vocal former Citizen Lab. n.d. “Home page.” Go Vocal former Citizen Lab. www.citizenlab.co.

Horowitz, Evan. 2019. “IQ rates are dropping in many developed countries and that doesn't bode well for humanity.” NBC News, 22. May. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/iq-rates-are-dropping-many-developed-countries-doesn-t-bode-ncna1008576.

Đorđević, Snežana. 2008. Vlasti u akciji – svet javnih usluga. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka.

Emas, Rachel. 2015. “The Concept of Sustainable Development: Definition and Defining Principles.” Brief for GSDR. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34980.22404.

European Movement International. n.d. “Citizens’ participation in the digital age: e-democracy. European Movement International. https://europeanmovement.eu/policy/citizens-participation-in-the-digital-age-e-democracy/.

Evans, Martin, Nogales, Ricardo, and Matthew Robson. 2023. “Monetary and Multidimensional Poverty: Correlation, Mismatches, and a Combined Approach.” The Journal of Development Studies, 60 (1): 147–170. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2023.2252140.

Fromm, Erich. 1989. Zdravo društvo. Zagreb: Naprijed; Beograd: Nolit.

International Association for Public Participation [IAP2]. 2018. “Public Participation Pillars.” IAP2.https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/Communications/A3_P2_Pillars_brochure.pdf.

Jafarkarimi, Hosein, Alex Sim, Robab Saadatdoost, and Jee Mei Hee. 2014. “The Impact of ICT on Reinforcing Citizens’ Role in Government Decision Making.” International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 4 (1): 642–646.

Kopanja, Vesna, Ivana Teodorović, i Zoran Njegovan. 2013. Analiza procesa planiranja u gradovima i opštinama u Republici Srbiji. Beograd: SKGO.

Kuzmanović, Dobrinka, Zoran Pavlović, Dragan Popadić, i Tijana Milošević. 2019. Korišćenje interneta i digitalne tehnologije kod dece i mladih u Srbiji - Rezultati istraživanja Deca Evrope na internet. Beograd: Institut za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu.

Le Blanc, David. 2020. E-participation: a quick overview of recent qualitative trends. New York, United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

Macintosh, Ann. 2004. “Characterizing e-participation in policy-making.” Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island: HI. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300.

Makinen, Katja. 2021. “Scales of participation and multi-scalar citizenship in EU participatory governance.” EPC: Politics and Space 39 (5): 1011–1029. DOI: 10.1177/2399654420981379.

Matković, Aleksandar, Novakov, Ivana, and Vanja Glišin. 2023. “Prevalence and Manifestations of Digital Harassment Among Young Adults in Serbia.” Studia Securitatis 17 (1): 88–103.

Maslov, Abraham. 1982. Motivacija i ličnost. Beograd: Nolit.

Mensah, Justice, and Sandra Ricart Casadevall. 2019. “Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action.” Cogen Social Sciences, 5 (1): 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531.

Mihailović, Vojislav, Vujo Ilić i Gordana Pavićević. 2022. Stavovi građana Srbije o učešću u demokratskim procesima 2021. Beograd: Crta.

Milutinović, Slobodan. 2004. Lokalna agenda 21 – Uvod u planiranje održivog razvoja. Beograd: SKGO.

Moyer, Melinda Wenner. 2022. “Kids as Young as 8 Are Using Social Media More Than Ever, Study Finds.” The New York Times, 24. March. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/24/well/family/child-social-media-use.html.

Ostojić, Ivana. 2020. „Institucionalna komponenta održivog razvoja Srbije.” U Izazovi održivog razvoja u Srbiji i Evropskoj uniji, ur. Predrag Jovanović, i Sanja Stojković Zlatanović, 101–117. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Pokrajinski sekretarijat za regionalni razvoj, međuregionalnu saradnju i lokalnu samoupravu. Program razvoja AP Vojvodine 2014–2020. Novi Sad: Pokrajinski sekretarijat za regionalni razvoj, međuregionalnu saradnju i lokalnu samoupravu.

Pokrajinski sekretarijat za regionalni razvoj, međuregionalnu saradnju i lokalnu samoupravu. 2023. Plan razvoja AP Vojvodine 2023–2030. godine. Novi Sad: Pokrajinski sekretarijat za regionalni razvoj, međuregionalnu saradnju i lokalnu samoupravu.

Sekretarijat za javne politike. 2023. Srbija i Agenda 2030 – Mapiranje nacionalnog strateškog okvira u odnosu na ciljeve održivog razvoja. Beograd: Sekretarijat za javne politike.

Stančetić, Veran. 2023. „Međuopštinska saradnja u Srbiji – mogućnosti i praktični dometi.” Srpska politička misao 81 (3): 77–96. DOI: 10.5937/spm81-45527.

The World Bank. 2014. “Ending poverty requires more than growth, says WBG.” The World Bank, 10. April. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/04/10/ending-poverty-requires-more-than-growth-says-wbg.

United Nations [UN]. 1987. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oslo: Brundtland commission.

United Nations [UN]. 2019. “Human Development Index Ranking.” UN. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/2019-human-development-index-ranking.

United Nations [UN]. 2015. “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” A/RES/70/1, UN. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. 2014. E-government Survey 2014 - E-government for the Future We Want. New York: UN.

United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs [DESA]. 2018. E-government Survey 2018 - Gearing E-government to Support Transformation Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. New York: UN.

United Nations Development Programme [UNDP]. n.d. “Human Development Index (HDI).” United Nations Development Programme. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi.

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. 2009. “What is Good Governance?” UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/good-governance.pdf.

United Nations Sustainable Development. 1992. United Nations Conference on Environment & Development – Agenda 21, 3 to 14 June. Rio de Janerio, Brasil.

Wirtz, Bernd, Peter Daiser, and Boris Binkowska. 2016. “E-participation: A Strategic Framework.” International Journal of Public Administration 41 (1): 1–12. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1242620.

Published
2024/09/02
Section
Članci