Funkcije preambula savremenih ustava

Vladimir T. Mikić

doi:10.5937/pravzap0-7011

Vladimir T. Mikić Univerzitet u Beogradu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-7011

Sažetak

U članku se ispituje sadržaj preambula savremenih ustavnih tekstova, u cilju utvrđivanja kakvu sve ulogu one mogu da imaju. Potrebno je utvrditi koji su to pravni, a koji vanpravni zadaci koji mogu da budu pripisani tekstovima preambula, ali i kakva pravna dejstva oni mogu imati. Nije nevažno ni utvrditi šta se „krije“ iza frazeoloških izbora prisutnih u sadržajima koje ne odlikuje normativna konceptualizacija. Rad se bavi značenjem pojmova koji se nalaze bliže polju pravne problematike, ali je posvećen i tumačenju vanpravnih funkcija preambula. Analiza obuhvata tekstove preambula važećih ustava širom sveta.

Biografija autora

Vladimir T. Mikić, Univerzitet u Beogradu

Doktor nauka - pravne nauke

Stručni saradnik u Sektoru za studije i nauku Univerziteta u Beogradu

Reference

Baker, N. D., 1935, The Making and Keeping of the Constitution, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, (http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=cutler, 09.03.2013);

Décision du Conseil constitutionnel n° 71-44 DC du 16 juillet 1971 (http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-con..-dc/decision-n-70-39-dc-du-19-juin-1970.7185.html, 11.11.2014);

Dodson, S., 2008, A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, October 2008, No., 5, str. 1319-1347;

Epps, Garrett, 2010, A Reader’s Tour of the Constitution: I. Preamble, “Tell me, Muse, how it all began”, 4-5 (http://www.ssrn-com/abstract=1445125, 10.04.2010);

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion on the New Constitution of Hungary (2011), Opinion no. 621/2011 (http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2011)016-E.aspx, 14.11.2014);

Ginsburg, T., Foti, N., Rockmore, D., 2014, ‘We the Peoples’: The Global Origins of Constitutional Preambles, The George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 46/2014, str. 101-135 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2360725, 14.11.2014);

Greene, A. S., 2005, Can We be Legal Positivists Without Being Constitutional Positivists?, Fordham Law Review 73/2005, str. 1401-1414;

Häberle, Peter, 2000, Ustav kao kultura, Zagreb, Politička misao, XXXVII (2000), str. 3-21;

Häberle, P., 2002, Ustavna država, Zagreb, Politička kultura;

King, B. W., 2000, Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules, Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 2:3/Apr. 2000, str. 609-661;

Kokott, J., 2010, The Basic Law at 60 – From 1949 to 2009: The Basic Law and Supranational Integration, German Law Journal, Vol 11, No. 01, str. 99-114;

Kutlešić, V., Preambule ustava – uporedna studija 194 važeća ustava, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2/2010, str. 60-76;

Marković, R., 2001, Ustavno pravo i političke institucije, Beograd, Službeni glasnik;

Marković, R., 2006, Ustav Republike Srbije od 2006 – kritički pogled, predgovor u: Ustav Republike Srbije sa registrom pojmova i Ustavni zakon za sprovođenje Ustava Republike Srbije, Beograd, 2006;

Orgad, L., 2010, The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2010) (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1686745, 12.11.2014);

Penney, J., Danay, R. J., 2006, The Embarassing Preamble? Understanding the “Supremacy of God” and the Charter, U.B.C. Law Review, Vol. 39:2/2006, str. 1, fusn. 3 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=941221 (12.06.2010);

Posavec, Z., 2001, Ustav kao kulturno postignuće: Heberleov nauk o ustavu kao znanosti kulture, Politička misao, XXXVIII (2001), br. 4, Zagreb;

Schmidt, C. W., 2011, Popular Constitutionalism on the Right: Lessons from the Tea Party, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 88/2011, Denver, 2001, str. 523-557.