Funkcije preambula savremenih ustava

Vladimir T. Mikić

doi:10.5937/pravzap0-7011

Vladimir T. Mikić University of Belgrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-7011

Abstract

U članku se ispituje sadržaj preambula savremenih ustavnih tekstova, u cilju utvrđivanja kakvu sve ulogu one mogu da imaju. Potrebno je utvrditi koji su to pravni, a koji vanpravni zadaci koji mogu da budu pripisani tekstovima preambula, ali i kakva pravna dejstva oni mogu imati. Nije nevažno ni utvrditi šta se „krije“ iza frazeoloških izbora prisutnih u sadržajima koje ne odlikuje normativna konceptualizacija. Rad se bavi značenjem pojmova koji se nalaze bliže polju pravne problematike, ali je posvećen i tumačenju vanpravnih funkcija preambula. Analiza obuhvata tekstove preambula važećih ustava širom sveta.

Author Biography

Vladimir T. Mikić, University of Belgrade

PhD in Law (Constitutional Law)

Consultant within the Depertmant for Education and Research of the University of Belgrade

References

Baker, N. D., 1935, The Making and Keeping of the Constitution, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, (http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=cutler, 09.03.2013);

Décision du Conseil constitutionnel n° 71-44 DC du 16 juillet 1971 (http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-con..-dc/decision-n-70-39-dc-du-19-juin-1970.7185.html, 11.11.2014);

Dodson, S., 2008, A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution, Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, October 2008, No., 5, str. 1319-1347;

Epps, Garrett, 2010, A Reader’s Tour of the Constitution: I. Preamble, “Tell me, Muse, how it all began”, 4-5 (http://www.ssrn-com/abstract=1445125, 10.04.2010);

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission): Opinion on the New Constitution of Hungary (2011), Opinion no. 621/2011 (http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/CDL-AD(2011)016-E.aspx, 14.11.2014);

Ginsburg, T., Foti, N., Rockmore, D., 2014, ‘We the Peoples’: The Global Origins of Constitutional Preambles, The George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 46/2014, str. 101-135 (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2360725, 14.11.2014);

Greene, A. S., 2005, Can We be Legal Positivists Without Being Constitutional Positivists?, Fordham Law Review 73/2005, str. 1401-1414;

Häberle, Peter, 2000, Ustav kao kultura, Zagreb, Politička misao, XXXVII (2000), str. 3-21;

Häberle, P., 2002, Ustavna država, Zagreb, Politička kultura;

King, B. W., 2000, Wild Political Dreaming: Historical Context, Popular Sovereignty, and Supermajority Rules, Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 2:3/Apr. 2000, str. 609-661;

Kokott, J., 2010, The Basic Law at 60 – From 1949 to 2009: The Basic Law and Supranational Integration, German Law Journal, Vol 11, No. 01, str. 99-114;

Kutlešić, V., Preambule ustava – uporedna studija 194 važeća ustava, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2/2010, str. 60-76;

Marković, R., 2001, Ustavno pravo i političke institucije, Beograd, Službeni glasnik;

Marković, R., 2006, Ustav Republike Srbije od 2006 – kritički pogled, predgovor u: Ustav Republike Srbije sa registrom pojmova i Ustavni zakon za sprovođenje Ustava Republike Srbije, Beograd, 2006;

Orgad, L., 2010, The Preamble in Constitutional Interpretation, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 8, No. 4 (2010) (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1686745, 12.11.2014);

Penney, J., Danay, R. J., 2006, The Embarassing Preamble? Understanding the “Supremacy of God” and the Charter, U.B.C. Law Review, Vol. 39:2/2006, str. 1, fusn. 3 (http://ssrn.com/abstract=941221 (12.06.2010);

Posavec, Z., 2001, Ustav kao kulturno postignuće: Heberleov nauk o ustavu kao znanosti kulture, Politička misao, XXXVIII (2001), br. 4, Zagreb;

Schmidt, C. W., 2011, Popular Constitutionalism on the Right: Lessons from the Tea Party, Denver University Law Review, Vol. 88/2011, Denver, 2001, str. 523-557.