Interests as the basis of corporate governance - shareholders' profit versus social responsibility
Abstract
In the article, the author pointed out that determining the content of company’s interest is dialectically related to question of whether there is a particular company interest or it is just a set of different interests that are affected by the externalization of operating costs. Shareholders are usually designated as the owners of the company, so the protection of their interests is perceived as a priority. However, the company’s limited liability and the separation of ownership from management provide an exceptional capacity for independent action and therefor require protection of company’s separate interests.
Classical theories about company relations limit the circle of participants to ones that are involved only in relations with a contractual nature. However, within the framework concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR), it is evident that there is essential importance of protecting company's distinguished interests, and also the public interests personalized in interests of consumers, interests of the state and society. The stakeholder theory emphasizes fundamental significance of harmony in relations between stakeholders, so the value could be created in the long run, and that it is counterproductive to focus only on economic principles of value creation.
It is impossible to ignore that the company itself is an entity with its own expectations, and if the interests of other stakeholders are removed, the only relevant company’s goal would be its existence, or the sustainability of its business. When the company’s interests are understood in this way, it is obvious that a long-term business policy forms the basic protection of those interests. CSR in modern sense is linked with the goal of sustainability, with a profitable nature as the most important factor of long-term business policy and sustainable development. However, as the contractual mechanisms are not enough to protect the stakeholders’ interests to a degree greater than company’s legal obligations towards its employees, consumers and creditors, there is a need for strong influence of imperative regulations in the field of CSR.References
Armour, J., Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R., 2009, Agency Problems, Legal Strategies and Enforcement, Harvard Law School, (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1436555).
Branston, R., Cowling, K., Sugden, R., 2001, Corporate Governance and the Public Interest, Warwick Economic Research Papers, (http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/1564/1/WRAP_Branston_twerp626.pdf).
Brink, А., 2011, Corporate Governance and Business Ethics, Springer.
Cheffins, B., 1997, Company Law: Theory, Structure, and Operation, New York, Oxford University Press.
Coase, R. H., 1937, The Nature of the Firm, Economica, New Series, vol. 4.
Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J., Stegel, D., 2008, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, New York, Oxford University Press.
Freeman, Е., Evan,W., 1990, Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation, Journal of Behavioral Economics, vol. 19, issue 4.
Freeman, E., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Parmar, B., De Colle, S., 2010, Stakeholder Theory, The State of the Art, New York,Cambridge University Press.
Friedman, M., 1962, Capitalism and Freedom, 40th Anniversary Edition,Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Harrison, Ј. Bosse, D., Phillips, R., 2010, Managing for Stakeholders, Stakeholder Utility Functions and Competitive Advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 31.
Hopt, K., Director’s Duties to Shareholders, Employees, and Other Creditors: A View from the Continent, in: Ewan McKendrick (ed.), 1992, Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations, Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976, Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs And Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3.
Jeurissen, R., 2007, Ethics and Business, Royal Van Gorcum.
Jovanović Zattila, M., Neke kontroverze akcionarstva, u: Lazić, M. (ur.), 2014, Usklađivanje prava Srbije sa pravom EU: tematski zbornik radova, Niš, Pravni fakultet.
Jovanović Zattila, M., 2014, Otrovne pilule – mera odbrane od neprijateljskog preuzimanja ili demonstracija moći ciljnog društva, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 68.
Kotz, D. M., 2015,The Rise and Fall of Neoliberal Capitalism, Cambridge,Harvard University Press.
Monks, R., Minow, N., 2011, Corporate Governance, Fifth edition, John Wiley & Sons.
Prentice, D. D., Directors, Creditors, and Shareholders, in: Ewan McKendrick (ed.), 1992, Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations, Oxford University Press.
Rönnegard, D., 2015, The Fallacy of Corporate Moral Agency, Springer.
Stout, L., 2012, The Shareholder Value Myth, San Francisco, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Williamson, O. E., 1984, Corporate Governance, Yale Law Journal, vol. 93.
Xuereb, P., 1987, Voting Rights: A Comparative Review, Company Lawyer, vol. 8/1.
Vasiljević, M., 2012, Civil Law and Business Judgment Rule, Аnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, LX/3.
Vasiljević, М., 2009, Korporativno upravljanje i agencijski problemi (II deo), Аnali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, LVII/2.
Velasco, J., 2006, The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder, University of California, Davis Law Review, vol. 40/2.
Pravni izvori
European Commission Green Paper COM(2011) 164 final of 5 April 2011 – The EU Corporate Governance Framework,
(http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/modern/com2011-164_en.pdf).
OECD, 2015, G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, Meeting of G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, Ankara, September 4-5; G20 Leaders Summit, Antalya, November 15-16,
(https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Corporate-Governance-Principles-ENG.pdf).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2004, Principles of Corporate Governance, Paris, OECD Publications, (https://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/corporategovernanceprinciples/31557724.pdf).
Zakon o preuzimanju akcionarskih društava, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 46/06, 107/09, 99/11 i 108/16.
Zakon o privrednim društvima, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 36/11, 99/11, 83/14 - dr. zakon i 5/15.