WALKING A TIGHTROPE: ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF LIMITING FREEDOM OF WORSHIP UNDER THE STATE OF EMERGENCY DECLARED IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA CAUSED BY THE EPIDEMIC OF COVID-19

  • Srđan MILOŠEVIĆ Institut za noviju istoriju Srbije
Keywords: secularity, secularism, religious freedom, limitation of freedom, Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, epidemics of Covid-19, holy communion

Abstract


This paper offers an answer to the following question: is the government authorized to intervene into the field of the religious freedom during the state of emergency, declared under the pressure of the ongoing epidemics, given the fact that the particular religious ritual – the holy communion – presupposes an epidemiologically risky practice. The main controversy stems from the conflicting positions taken by the religious dogma and scientific evidence: theology explicitly posits that the ritual of the holy communion cannot be considered risky behavior, even though practiced by using the very same object being put into the oral cavity (cavitas oris) of all participants of the ritual. A scientific approach contradicts this. At first sight, another controversial issue is the constitutional one: the 2006 Serbian Constitution explicitly guarantees non-derogability of religious freedom during the state of emergency, although the Constitution itself in Article 43 does not envisage freedom of religion as an absolute right.

In this paper, I have argued that the state not only has been authorized but has been obliged to forbid (at least in ultima linea), the dangerous religious practices. The fact that the Constitution guarantees religious freedom during the state of emergency, poses no obstacles to state intervention because the right to religious freedom, guaranteed in Article 43, provides the legitimate reasons for the limitation of this right, including the limitation of public health protection. The limitations are restricted to the numerus clauses of the legitimate reasons, meaning that a religious freedom cannot be limited for any other reason, but the one among the precisely mentioned in the Constitution. This kind of constitutional interpretation also eliminates an insurmountable and unacceptable inconsistency among the constitutional provisions as well as the inconsistent interpretation that the same right might be limited under the normal circumstances, but cannot be limited during the state of emergency.

References

Literatura

Adhar, R., 2013, Is Secularism Neutral?, Ratio Juris, 3.

Alkan, Y. S., 2015, Facilitative Secularism: The Place of Religious Arguments in Public Political Debate, Leicaster, University of Leicaster (rukopis doktorske disertacije),

https://leicester.figshare.com/articles/Facilitative_secularism_the_place_of_religious_arguments_in_public_political_debate/10142606/1, 12. 4. 2020.

Avramović, S., Understanding Secularism in a Post-Communist State: Case of Serbia, in: Martínez-Torrón, J., Durham Jr., W. C., (eds.), 2015, Religion and the Secular State: National Reports, Madrid, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense.

Avramović, S., 2011, Poimanje sekularnosti u Srbiji – refleksije sa javne rasprave u Ustavnom sudu, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2.

Bader, V., 1999, Religious Pluralism. Secularism or Priority for Democracy?, Political Theory, 5.

Beširević, V., A Short Guide to Militant Democracy: Some Remarks on the Strasbourg Jurisprudence, in: Benedek, W. et al., (eds.), 2012, European Yearbook of Human Rights, Intersentia, NW Verlag.

Bhargava, R., 2014, How Secular is European Secularism?, European Societies, Vol. 16, No. 3.

Božić, M., 2013, Laička republika, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Boyle, K., 2004, Human Rights, Religion and Democracy: The Refah Party Case, Essex Human Rights Review, 1.

Casanova, J., 1998, Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago, London, University Chicago Press.

Dimitrijević, V. et al., 2012, Osnovi međunarodnog javnog prava, Beograd, Beogradski centar za ljudska prava.

Draškić, M., 2013, Ustav Srbije: Striktna ili kooperativna odvojenost crkve i države?, Sveske za javno pravo, 4.

Fleiner, T., Basta Fleiner, L., 2009, Constitutional Democracy in a Multicultural and Globalised World, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

Fox, J., 2011, Separation of Religion and State and Secularism in Theory and in Practice, Religion, State and Society, Vol. 39, No. 4.

Fox, J., 2019, How Secular Are Western Governments’ Religion Policies?, Secular Studies, 1.

Goodman, R. A. et al., (eds.), 2003, Law in Public Health Practice, New York, Oxford University Press.

Gujaničić, D., 2012, Načelo svetovnosti države u Srbiji, Politička revija, 34.

Hesse, K., 1999, Grundzüge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Heidelberg, Müller Verlag.

Hunger, I. et al., in: Hunger, I. et al., (eds.), 2013, Biopreparedness and Public Health. Exploring Synergies, Dordrecht, Springer.

Joseph, S., Castan, M., 2013, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 3rd edition, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Laborde, C., 2017, Liberalism’s Religion, Cambridge, London, Harvard University Press.

Le Grand, J., New, B., 2015, Government Paternalism. Nanny State or Helping Friend?, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Mancini, S., Rosenfeld, M., 2014, Constitutional Secularism in an Age of Religious Revival, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Marinković, T., Prilog za javnu raspravu o ustavnosti Zakona o crkvama i verskim zajednicama, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 1.

McLeod, H., 2000, Secularisation in Western Europe, 1848-1914, Palgrave Macmillan.

Mikić, V., 2017, Svetovnost države u Ustavu Republike Srbije i njegovoj primeni, Srpska politička misao. Posebno izdanje.

Mitrović, P., 2015, Načelo svetovnosti u Republici Srbiji prema Ustavu iz 2006, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 1.

Murdoch, J., 2012, Protecting the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion Under the European Convention on Human Rights. Council of Europe Human Rights Handbooks, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.

Nowak, M., Vospernik, T., Permissible Restrictions on Freedom of Religion or Belief, in: Lindholm, T., Durham Jr., W. C., Tahzib-Lie, B. G., 2006, Facilitating Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Deskbook.

Pajvančić, M., 2009, Komentar Ustava Republike Srbije, Beograd, Fondacija Konrad Adenauer.

Popović, D., (ur.), 2017, Komentar Konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Beograd, Službeni glasnik.

Popović, J., 1978, Dogmatika pravoslavne crkve od Justina Popovića, Knj. 3, Eklisiologija: učenje o crkvi, Valjevo, Manastir Ćelije.

Radosavljević, V., Belojević, G., 2012, Unusual Epidemic Events: A New Method of Early Orientation and Differentiation Between Natural and Deliberate Epidemics, Public Health, 126.

Rakitić, D., 2015, Secularity and Religious Neutrality in the Context of Democracy – Origins and Concepts, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 2.

Robers, G., (ur.), 2012, Država i Crkva u Evropskoj uniji, Beograd, Pravoslavni bogoslovski fakultet.

Rodriguez-Dod, E. C., Marty, A. M., Marty-Nelson, E. M., 2017, Tears in Heaven: Religiously and Culturally Sensitive Laws for Preventing the Next Pandemic, Catholic University Law Review, 1.

Sajó, A., 2009, Constitutionalism and Secularism: The Need For Public Reason, Cardozo Law Review, 6.

Sajó, A., Preliminaries to a Concept of Constitutional Secularism, International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 6, No. 3–4.

Simović, D., Simeunović Patić, B., Normative Sacred Versus Real Desecularisation Road to (In)Tolerant and (Un)Violent Serbian Society, u: Jevtić, M., Veković, M., 2016, 10 godina časopisa „Politikologija religije“. Zbornik radova, Beograd, Centar za proučavanje religije i versku toleranciju Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet političkih nauka.

Venter, F., 2000, Constitutional Comparison: Japan, Germany, Canada and South Africa As Constitutional States, Dordrecht, Kluwer Law International.

Zala, M., 2019, Secularism in Political Philosophy, Oxford Encyclopaedia of Politics, https://oxfordre.com/politics/, DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1388.

Zuniga, J. M., Marks, S. P., Gostin, L. O., (eds.), 2013, Advancing the Human Right to Health, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Propisi

Međunarodni pakt o ekonomskim, socijalnim i kulturnim pravima, Sl. list SFRJ – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 7/71.

Međunarodni pakt o građanskim i političkim pravima, Sl. list SFRJ – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 7/71.

Odluka o proglašenju vanrednog stanja, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 29/20.

Savet Evrope, Evropska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih sloboda, Sl. list SCG – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 9/03, 5/05 i 7/05 i Sl. glasnik RS – Međunarodni ugovori, br. 12/10 i 10/15.

Univerzalna deklaracija o ljudskim pravima, UN dok, 217 (III) A, Pariz, 10. decembar 1948.

Uredba o merama za vreme vanrednog stanja, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 31/20, 36/20, 38/20, 39/20, 43/20, 47/20, 49/20, 53/20, 56/20, 57/20, 58/20 i 60/20.

Ustav Republike Srbije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 98/06. (Sec: https://www.paragraf.rs/propisi/ustav_republike_srbije.html).

Zakon o crkvama i verskim zajednicama, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 36/06.

Sudska praksa

ECtHR, Lautsi and Others v. Italy, no. 30814/06, Judgment of 18 March 2011[GC], para. 116.

ECtHR, Refah Partisi and Others v. Turkey, no. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98 [GC], Judgment of 13 February 2003, paras. 43, 49, 70.

Ustavni sud Republike Srbije, IУз-455/2011, presuda od 16. 1. 2013, Sl. glasnik RS, 23/13, (Sec: http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/predmet/sr-Latn-CS/8389/, 3. 5. 2020).

Izvori sa interneta

Antonić, S., 2020, Uskršnja autošovinistička histerija i poplava doušništva, Nova srpska politička misao, (http://www.nspm.rs/kolumne-slobodana-antonica/uskrsnja-autosovinisticka-histerija-i-poplava-dousnistva.html, 5. 5. 2020).

Crkva puna usred policijskog časa: Imamo prećutnu dozvolu, NovaS, (https://nova.rs/drustvo/uprkos-policijskom-casu-vernici-izasli-na-sluzbu/, 19. 5. 2020).

Ј. Т., 2020, Prvo hapšenje zbog vernika na liturgiji, Danas Online, (https://www.danas.rs/drustvo/prvo-hapsenje-zbog-vernika-na-liturgiji/, 10. 5. 2020).

Kišjuhas, A., 2020, Religija protiv zdravlja, Danas Online, https://www.danas.rs/kolumna/aleksej-kisjuhas/religija-protiv-zdravlja/, 30. 4. 2020.

Mediji: U crkvi u Petrovaradinu dvadesetak vernika, nepoznati snimali novinare, N1, (http://rs.n1info.com/Vesti/a590776/Mediji-Crkva-u-Petrovaradinu-puna-nepoznati-snimali-novinare.html, 19. 5. 2020).

Orlović, S., 2020, Verujem cenjena glavo da si i učio pravo, Komentar dana, 14. april 2020, Nova srpska politička misao, (http://www.nspm.rs/komentar-dana/verujem-cenjena-glavo-da-si-i-ucio-pravo.html?alphabet=l, 3. 5. 2020).

Saopštenje za javnost Svetog Arhijerejskog Sinoda, (http://www.spc.rs/sr/saopshtenje_za_javnost_svetog_arhijerejskog_sinoda_4, 18. 4. 2020).

Saopštenje za javnost Svetog Arhijerejskog Sinoda, (http://www.spc.rs/sr/saopshtenje_za_javnost_svetog_arhijerejskog_sinoda_5, 28. 4. 2020).

Sekulović, V., 2020, Ruski rulet sa životima vernika, Danas Online, (https://www.danas.rs/dijalog/licni-stavovi/ruski-rulet-sa-zivotima-vernika/,18. 4. 2020).

Srbljanović, B., 2020, Moć elite, Javni servis, (https://javniservis.net/komentar/biljana-srbljanovic-moc-elite/, 20. 4. 2020).

Tasić, J., 2020, Policija nezakonito upadala u crkve, Danas Online, (https://www.danas.rs/drustvo/policija-nezakonito-upadala-u-crkve/, 10. 5. 2020).

Tasić, J., 2020, Policija kontroliše beogradske crkve, Danas Online, https://www.danas.rs/drustvo/policija-kontrolise-beogradske-crkve/, 19.5. 2020).

U pojedinim crkvama pričešćivanje i za Uskrs, vernici sa kućnim ljubimcima otišli u crkve, Insajder, (https://insajder.net/sr/sajt/vazno/17997/, 19. 5. 2020).

Published
2020/07/18
Section
Original Scientific Paper