THE STATUS AND RIGHTS OF THE CHILD IN THE SAME-SEX UNION: EUROPEAN LAW AND PRACTICE

EUROPEAN LAW AND PRACTICE

  • Ranka Vujović Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union u Beogradu
Keywords: child, parents, same-sex partner, marriage, same-sex unions, family life, personal relationships, alimentation, adoption, foster care

Abstract


Parental rights are obviously the most controversial issue in the legal regulation of same-sex unions. This is one of the challenges facing the Republic of Serbia at this moment and which needs to be comprehensively considered in order to meet the announced legal regulation of same-sex unions, and this work is directed towards that goal. The focus of the paper is not the discussion about how the sexual orientation of parents affects the quality of parenting and the well-being of children and whether the sexual identity of parents is an important factor in effective parenting. This work is the result of research on how in the European legal area, in the member states of the Council of Europe and the European Union, which have legally regulated same-sex unions, the principles of equality, the rule of law, and the best interests of the child are reflected on the legal position of children and the enjoyment of rights arising from family life. In addition to the various points of view presented in the legal literature, the paper presents key positions and the latest decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice, which have specific implications for the need to harmonize internal regulations and legal practice in the member states, and a critical review of jurisprudence is given of certain foreign courts of the highest rank in cases whose outcomes can significantly influence the change of doctrines in the judicial practice of those countries, but also as an inspiration to other legal systems. 

 

References

 

LITERATURA

1.     Ćorac, S., 2015, Ponavljanje postupka u parnici zbog odluke Evropskog suda za ljudska prava, Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, Vol. 87, br. 4, str. 207–218. 

2.     Gajin, S, 2012, Ljudska prava. Pravno-sistemski okvir, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union u Beogradu.

3.     Guillod, O., 2003, Abortion, Registered Partnership and Other Matters, The International Survey of Family Law, Bristol. 

4.     Golubović, Z., 1981, Porodica kao ljudska zajednica, Zagreb. 

5.     Husić, A., Nurkić, B., Poštivanje LGBTIQA prava u Bosni i Hercegovini – još jedan primjer slabe vladavine prava u Bosni i Hercegovini, u: Horvat Vuković, A., Kuzelj, V., Petričušić, A., (ur./eds.), 2022, Razvoj i zaštita prava LGBTIQA+ osoba / Development and Protection of LGBTIQA+ Rights, Zagreb, pp. 127-146.

6.     Jakovac Lozić, D., 2017, „Rod” protiv „spola” – polazište na putu razaranja braka i obitelji, Zbornik radova Aktualnosti građanskog i trgovačkog zakonodavstva i pravne prakse, 15, pp. 135-157,

7.     Kuby, G., 2013, Svjetska seksualna revolucija. Uništenje slobode u ime slobode, Zagreb,Naklada Benedikta. 

8.     Mršević, Z., 2009, Istopolne zajednice i deca, Stanovništvo, 1, Beograd.

9.     Petričušić, A., Željko, D., Radović, B., Pristup i aktivnosti Vijeća Europe s ciljem dokidanja homofobije, bifobije, transfobije i diskriminacije na osnovi seksualne orijentacije i rodnog identiteta, u: Horvat Vuković, A., Kuzelj, V., Petričušić, A., (ur./eds.), 2022,  Razvoj i zaštita prava LGBTIQA+ osoba/Development and Protection of LGBTIQA+ Rights, Zagreb, pp. 179-202,

10.  Sobotková, I., 2007, Psychologie rodiny, Praha, Portál. 

11.  Vučković Šahović, N., Petrušić, N., 2015, Prava deteta, Niš, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu. 

12.  Vujović, R., The child’s right to dignity and bodily integrity – European standards and Case law, Pavlović, Z. (ed.), 2020, Yearbook – Human Rights Protection, The right to human dignity, No. 3, Provincial Protector of Citizens – Ombudsman & Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, Novi Sad, pp. 75-92.

 

PROPISI

1.     Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, also known as the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), ETS No. 005 (4 November 1950).

2.     European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of The European Union, OJ 2007 C 303/01.

3.     International Classification of Diseases, (ICD-10). 

4.     Ley 13/2005, Spain, Boletín Oficial del Estado, núm. 157 de 02 de Julio de 2005.

5.     Kooseluseadus, Estonia, Riigi teataja, RT I, 16.10.2014, 1.

6.     Obiteljski zakon, Republika Hrvatska, Narodne novine, br. 103/15 i 98/19.

7.     Porodični zakon, Crna Gora, Sl. list RCG, br. 1/07 i Sl. list CG, br. 53/16 i 76/20.

8.     Zakon o životnom partnerstvu lica istog pola, Crna Gora, Sl. list CG, br. 67/20.

9.     Zakon o životnom partnerstvu osoba istog spola, Republika Hrvatska, Narodne novine, br. 92/14 i 98/19.

10.  Zakon o parničnom postupku, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 72/11, 49/13 – US, 74/13 – US, 55/14, 87/18 i 18/20.

11.  Zakon o udomiteljstvu, Republika Hrvatska, Narodne novine, br. 115/18.

12.  UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, (UN doc.) General Assembly resolution 44/25, 20. November 1989.

13.  Ustav Republike Srbije, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 98/06 i 16/22.

 

SUDSKA PRAKSA

1.     CJEU, case C-490/20, V.M.A. v. Sofia municipality, Pancharevo district, Bulgaria, Judgment of 14. December2021, ECLI:EU:C:2021:1008.

2.     ECtHR, Burden v. UK [GC], no. 13378/05, Judgment of 29. april 2008.

3.     ECtHR, Fretté v. France, no. 36515/1997, Judgment of 26. February 2002.

4.     ECtHR, Fedotova and 2 others v. Russia, no. 40792/10, Judgment of 13. July 2021.

5.     ECtHR, Orlandi and others v. Italy, nos. 26431/12, 26742/12, 44057/12 and 60088/12, Judgment of 14 December 2017.

6.     ECtHR, Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, Judgment of 9. June 2009.

7.     ECtHR, Schalk and Kopf v. Austria, no. 30141/04, Judgment of 24 June 2010.

8.     ECtHR, Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v. Portugal, no. 33290/96, Judgment of 21. December 1999.

9.     ECtHR Vallianatos and other v. Greece, nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09, Judgment of 7. November 2013.

10.  ECtHR, X. v. The United Kingdom, no. 11716/85, Judgment of 14. May 1986.

11.  EctHR, X. v. Island, no. 6825/74, Decision of 18 May 1976.

12.  ECtH, Dudgeon v. The United Kingdom, no. 7525/76, Judgment of 22. October 1981.

13.  Supreme Court of Estonia, EST-2018-1-001, Case no. 5-17-42, Order of 10. April 2018.

14.  Upravni sud u Zagrebu, Uszp-43/20-7, presuda od 21. aprila 2021.

15.  Ustavni sud Hrvatske, U-I-144/2019 i dr., odluka i rješenje od 29. januara 2020.

 

INTERNET IZVORI

 

1.     Obrazloženje Nacrta zakona o istopolnim zajednicama,   https://www.paragraf.rs/dnevne-vesti/080321/080321-vest18.html.

Published
2022/12/23
Section
Review Paper