ODGOVORNOST POSLODAVCA U SRBIJI ZA ŠTETU PROUZROKOVANU POVREDOM NA RADU: SLUČAJ PROFESIONALNIH SPORTISTA
Abstract
Pravo na bezbednost i zdravlje na radu jedno je od osnovnih ljudskih prava na radu, koje je zagarantovano najvišim međunarodnim i domaćim pravnim instrumentima. U srpskom pravu takvo pravo je zagarantovano, najpre, samim Ustavom, a zatim Zakonom o radu i Zakonom o bezbednosti i zdravlju na radu, kroz norme koje detaljnije pristupaju ovom pitanju. Ove norme otelotvorene su pre svega u određenim obavezama poslodavca, u cilju obezbeđenja bezbednosti i zdravlja na radu prvenstveno zaposlenih kod poslodavca. S druge strane, u slučajevima kada poslodavac ne uspe da obezbedi bezbedno i zdravo radno okruženje, pa čak i u slučajevima kada do povrede dođe iako je sve u ovom procesu urađeno kako treba, postavlja se pitanje odgovornosti poslodavca za štetu koja je povredom prouzrokovana. U ovom radu autorka stoga daje detaljnu analizu ove problematike, s posebnim osvrtom na pitanje odgovornosti za štetu koja je na ovaj način naneta sportistima u statusu zaposlenih lica.
References
Bibliography
Andrejević, S., Odgovornost za štetu na radu i u vezi sa radom, in: Petrović, Z. (ed.), 2005, Naknada štete i osiguranje, Budva, Intermeks, pp. 17–33.
Antić, O., 2010, Obligaciono pravo, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje.
Bulat, P., Hirose, K., Protić, J., 2018, Occupational Safety and Health in the Construction Sector in Serbia, Geneva, International Labour Office.
Cotter, B., Contributory Negligence, Consenting to the Risk of Injury and Unpaid Volunteers, in: Cotter, B., Bennett, D. (eds.), 2006, Munkman on Employer’s Liability, London, LexisNexis Butterworths, pp. 187–213.
Despotović, D., Praštalo, T., 2018, Odgovornost poslodavca usled povrede na radu i profesionalne bolesti sa posebnim osvrtom na naknadu materijalne štete, Poslovne studije, 19–20, pp. 75–88.
Drakopoulos, A. S., Theodossiou, I., 2016, Workers’ Risk Underestimation and Occupational Health and Safety Regulation, European Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 641–656.
Đurđević, N., 2012, Osnov odgovornosti za štetu koju pretrpi sportista na sportskom takmičenju, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 4, pp. 751–768.
Eurofound, 2020, Regulations to Address Work–life Balance in Digital Flexible Working Arrangements, New forms of employment series, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
Frntić, F. D. et al., 2017, Detaljni komentar Zakona o radu, Zagreb, Rosip.
Ivošević, Z., Ivošević, M., 2018, Komentar Zakona o radu, 5th ed., Beograd, Službeni glasnik.
Karanikić Mirić, M., Granica odgovornosti poslodavca za zaposlenog, in: Ignjatović, Đ. (ed.), 2020, Kaznena reakcija u Srbiji, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, pp. 161–182.
Kovačević, Lj., 2021, Zasnivanje radnog odnosa, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje.
Lubarda, B., 2013, Radno pravo – Rasprava o dostojanstvu na radu i socijalnom dijalogu, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje.
Medić, D., Neki aspekti naknade štete za duševne bolove zbog umanjenja životne aktivnosti, in: Petrović, Z. (ed.), 2005, Naknada štete i osiguranje, Budva, Intermeks, pp. 101–114.
Mićović, M., 2015, Povreda sportskih pravila i odgovornost sportista za štetu, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu, 4, pp. 1039–1046.
Petrović, M., 2019, Compensation of work injuries and occupational diseases – A comparative approach, Strani pravni život, 4, pp. 103–113.
Petrović, M., 2019, Pravni režim povrede na radu i profesionalnog oboljenja u domaćem i uporednom pravu, Strani pravni život, 1, pp. 103–113.
Petrović, M., 2019, Prevencija povreda na radu i profesionalnih oboljenja – Pojam, troškovi i ekonomski podsticaji za ulaganje u prevenciju, Pravo i privreda, 7–9, pp. 679–690.
Petrović, Z., Mrvić Petrović, N., 2006, Naknada štete – odgovornost i naknada štete zbog povrede fizičkog integriteta: načelni stavovi i pravna shvatanja, Belgrade, Intermeks.
Petrović, M., 2021, Radnopravna i socijalnopravna zaštita zaposlenih od povreda na radu i profesionalnih bolesti, doktorska disertacija, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Reljanović, M., 2014, Privremeno zapošljavanje u Republici Hrvatskoj – pouke za buduće regulisanje u Republici Srbiji, Strani pravni život, 2, pp. 191–209.
Sudžum, R., 2004, Pravni aspekti povrede na radu i profesionalne bolesti, Beograd, Savremena administracija.
Sudžum, R., Stamatović, M., 1995, Povrede na radu i profesionalne bolesti –prava i obaveze, Beograd, NIP „Zaštita rada” d.d.
Legislative Sources
ILO
1. International Labour Conference – 110th Session, Resolution on the inclusion of a safe and healthy working environment in the ILO’s framework of fundamental principles and rights at work (10 June 2022).
Council of Europe
1. European Social Charter (Revised), Official Gazette of RS – International Agreements, No. 42/2009.
EU
1. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/391.
2. Council Directive of 12 June 1989 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (89/391/EEC), Official Journal of the European Communities L 183/3.
Serbian legislative sources
1. Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 98/06.
2. Labour Law, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 24/05, 61/05, 54/09, 32/13, 75/14, 13/17 – Ruling CC, 113/17 and 95/18 – authentic interpretation.
3. Law on Agency Employment, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 86/19.
4. Law on Contracts and Torts, Official Gazette of the SFR Yugoslavia, Nos. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – Ruling CC, 57/89, Official Gazette of the FR Yugoslavia, No. 31/93 and Official Gazette of the RS, No. 18/2020.
5. Law on Prevention of Harassment at Work, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 36/10.
6. Law on Public Ski Areas, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 46/06.
7. Law on Safety and Health, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 101/05, 91/15 and 113/17 – other law.
8. Law on Sports, Official Gazette of theRS, No. 10/16.
Case Law
Practice of the CJEU
CJEU, joined cases C-397/01, Bernhard Pfeiffer, C-398/01, Wilhelm Roith, C-399/01, Albert Süß, C-400/01, Michael Winter, C-401/01, Klaus Nestvogel, C-402/01, Roswitha Zeller and C-403/01, Matthias Döbele v.Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV., Јudgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 October 2004, ECLI:EU:C:2004:584.
CJEU, Case C-52/04, Personalrat der Feuerwehr Hamburg v. Leiter der Feuerwehr Hamburg, Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 July 2005, ECLI:EU:C:2005:467.
Practice of domestic courts
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade, Gž No. 774/16 of 22.03.2017.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade, Gž1 No. 3405/16 of 21.04.2017.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade, Gž1 No. 5851/10 of 17.11.2010.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade, Gž1 No. 779/2011 of 11.10.2012.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Novi Sad, Gž. No. 1945/12 of 23.08.2012.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Novi Sad, Gž. No. 5073/13 of 17.04.2014.
Judgment of the District Court in Belgrade, Gž. No. 5166/03 of 17.07.2003.
Judgment of the District Court in Užice, Gž. No. 1393/08 of 18.06.2008.
Judgment of the Municipal Court in Niš, P. No. 1521/03 of 27.10.2005.
Judgment of the Second Municipal Court in Belgrade, P. No. 481/00 of 4.04.2002.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation, Rev 2 No. 154/2016 of 09.03.2017.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation, Rev. No. 438/17 of 22.03.2017.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 1190/96 of 20.03.1996.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 1360/01 of 6.06.2001.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 2178/93 of 24.04.1993.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 687/07 of 18.04.2007.
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 76/98 of 2.11.1998.
Decision of the Court of Appeal in Belgrade, Gž. No. 4207/18 of 21.02.2019.
Decision of the District Court in Niš, Gž. No. 1148/06 of 5.06.2006.
Decision of the Supreme Court of Serbia Rev. No. 1587/04, of 9.02.2005.
Decision of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 246/01 of 17.01.2002.
Decision of the Supreme Court of Serbia, Rev. No. 399/02 of 28.03.2002.
Internet sources
Opie, H. 1986, Condon v. Basi, Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 4. (http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/MelbULawRw/1986/24.pdf, 9.12.2019), pp. 756–762.
Council of Europe, 2008, Digest of the case law of the European Committee of Social Rights, (https://rm.coe.int/168049159f, 3.9.2020).>
Council of Europe, 2018, Digest of the case law of the European Committee of Social Rights, (https://rm.coe.int/digest-2018-parts-i-ii-iii-iv-en/1680939f80, 3.9.2020).>
James, M., 2006, Liability for Professional Athletes’ Injuries: A Comparative Analysis of Where the Risk Lies, Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, (http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/1058/1/james1.pdf, 1.1.2020).
Kun, A., 2014, Work Accident Compensation in Hungarian Labour Law – Liability Rules and Compensation, Hungarian Labour Law E–Journal, pp. 64–81, (https://www.hllj.hu/letolt/2014_1_a/04.pdf, 20.4.2019).
Masel, D., Costaras D., Voluntary Assumption of Risk – Sporting Injuries and Voluntary Assumption of Risk, (https://foleys.com.au/resources/Voluntary%20Assumption%20of%20Risk_15Oct2015.pdf, 31.12.2019).
Serbian Government, 2021, Law Proposal оn Safety and Health at Work (http://www.parlament.gov.rs/upload/archive/files/cir/pdf/predlozi_zakona/13_saziv/295-23.pdf, 31.3.2023).