OSVRT NA ISTOVETNOST PRAVA U DIGITALNOM I STVARNOM OKRUŽENJU

Keywords: istovetnost prava, privatnost, obrazovanje, sloboda izražavanja, pravo na zaborav, nediskriminacija, teorija nekoherentnosti digitalnih prava

Abstract


Cilj članka je da ispita da li i kako koncept istovetnosti ljudskih prava onlajn i oflajn može biti opravdan. Metoda je uporedna: analizira se promena značenja i obima četiri prava pri prelasku iz nedigitalnog u digitalni domen. Prava su: obrazovanje, nediskriminacija, sloboda izražavanja i privatnost (sa naglaskom na pravu na zaborav). Istražuju se promene značenja, obaveze države i uloga privatnih aktera. Teorijska osnova je teorija nekoherentnosti digitalnih ljudskih prava koja pokazuje da onlajn i oflajn prava imaju slično značenje samo na opštem nivou. Konkretizacija istih prava dovodi do nekoherentnih slika. Nekoherentnost na konkret- nom nivou omogućava očuvanje istovetnosti na apstraktnom nivou. To je generička karakteristika ljudskih prava koja omogućava da se tvrdi da su ljudska prava nezavisna od domena.

Author Biographies

Vesna Crnić-Grotić, University of Rijeka

Professor

Vygantė Milašiūtė, Vilnius University

Associate professor

Tiina Pajuste, Tallinn University

Professor

Mart Susi, Tallinn University

Professor 

References

Bibliography

Barry, B. K., 2022, Impact of the Digitalization of Education on the Right to Edu- cation, A/HRC/50/32.

Coccoli, J., 2017, The Challenges of New Technologies in the Implementation of Human Rights: an Analysis of Some Critical Issues in the Digital Era, Peace Human Rights Governance, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 223–250.

Crnić-Grotić, V., 2022, Legal Education and Legal Profession During and After COVID-19 the Shifting Idea of Law School: Systems and Processes, Legal Education and Legal Profession During and After COVID-19, Springer Nature Singapore, pp. 185–193.

Dror-Shpoliansky, D., Shany, Y., 2021, It’s the End of the (Offline) World as We Know It: From Human Rights to Digital Human Rights – A Proposed Typology, The European Journal of International Law, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1249–1282.

Farrior, S., (ed.), 2015, Equality and Non-Discrimination Under International Law, Vol. II, London–New York, Routledge.

Herzog, L., Algorithmic Bias and Access to Opportunities in: Véliz, C., (ed.), 2021, Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Higgins Dbe Qc, R., 2009, The Development of International Law by the Political Organs of the United Nations, Themes and Theories, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Kraljić, S., The Right to Education in a Digital Era, in: Sannikova, L. V., (eds.), 2024, Digital Technologies and Distributed Registries for Sustainable Development. Law, Governance and Technology Series, Vol. 64. Cham, Springer, pp. 135–153.

Land, M., 2013, Toward an International Law of the Internet, Harvard Interna- tional Law Journal, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 393–459.

Lomas, N., 2014, Google.com Domain Should Be Covered By Search De-Listing, Say European Regulators, Tech Crunch, (https://techcrunch.com/2014/11/26/rtbf- dot-com/, 26. 09. 2024).

McGregor, L., Murray, D., Ng, V., 2019, International Human Rights Law as a Framework for Algorithmic Accountability, International ad Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 309–343.

Mezei, P., 2023, Digital Higher Education and Copyright Law in the Age of Pandemic – The Hungarian Experience, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 330–350.

Moeckli, D., Equality and Non-discrimination, in: Farrior, S., (ed.), 2015, Equality and Non-Discrimination Under International Law, Vol. II, London–New York, Routledge.

Motau, V., 2023, Has Covid-19 Really Moved Education to 4IR Where Learning Will Be Digital, with a Few Occasions of Face-to-Face Engagements?, Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 222–241.

O’Flaherty, M., 2012, Freedom of Expression: Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Human Rights Committee’s General Comment No. 34, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 627–654.

Oster, J., 2017, European and International Media Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Pajuste, T., (ed.), 2022, Specific Threats to Human Rights Protection from the Digital Reality, Tallin, Tallinn University, COST Action GDHRNet project, (https:// graphite.page/GDHRNet-threats-to-human-rights-protection/assets/documents/ GDHRNet-ThreatsReport-EditedVolume.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

Richardson, M., 2023, The Right to Privacy 1914–1948: The Lost Years, Singapore, Springer.

Rona, G., Aarons, L., 2016, State Responsibility to Respect, Protect and Fulfill Human Rights Obligations in Cyberspace, Journal of National Security Law & Policy, Vol. 8, pp. 1–33.

Rowbottom, J., 2018, Media Law, Oxford, Hart Publishing.

Rue, F. la, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, HRC 17th session, UN doc. A/ HRC/17/27 (27 May 2011).

Sanders, C. K., Scanlon, E., 2021, The Digital Divide Is a Human Rights Issue: Advancing Social Inclusion Through Social Work Advocacy, Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, Vol. 6, pp. 130–143.

Susi, M., 2024, Non-Coherence Theory of Digital Human Rights, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Weber, Rolf H., 2011, The Right to Be Forgotten: More Than a Pandora’s Box?, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 120–130.

Werro, F., (ed.), 2020, The Right To Be Forgotten, A Comparative Study of the Emergent Right’s Evolution and Application in Europe, the Americas, and Asia, Cham, Springer.

Youm, K. H., Park, A., 2023, The Right to Be Forgotten: Google Spain as a Benchmark for Free Speech versus Privacy?, Chicago Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 167–186.

Yu, P. K., 2002, Bridging the Digital Divide: Equality in the Information Age, Car- dozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1–52.

Zaccaroni, G., 2021, Equality and Non-Discrimination in the EU: The Foundations of the EU Legal Order, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.

Legislative Sources

CESCR, Implementation of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 13: The Right to Education (Article 13), (8 December 1999).

Council of Europe Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law, 2024.

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2024 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union Legislative Acts (COM(2021)0206 – C9–0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD)).

UN CRC, General Comment No. 25 (2021) on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment, UN doc. CRC/C/GC/25 (2 March 2021).

UN GA Resolution 217 A, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UN doc. A/ RES/217 (III) (10 December 1948).

UN GA, Promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, UN doc. A/74/486, (9 October 2019).

UN GA Resolution 2200A, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, UN Doc. A/6316 (1966), 993 UNTS 3.

UN HRC, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Internet, HRC 20th Session, UN Doc. A/HRC/20/L.13 (29 June 2012).

UN HRC, The promotion, protection and enjoyment of human rights on the Inter- net, A/HRC/47/L.22, (13 July 2021).

UN HRC, General Comment No. 34 on Article 19: Freedoms of opinion and expres- sion, 102nd session, UN doc. CCPR /C/GC/34 (12 September 2011).

UN HRC, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy, HRC 37th session, UN doc. A/HRC/37/62 (6 March 2018).

UN HRC, CCPR General Comment No. 18, Non-discrimination, 10 November 1989, UN doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.9 (Vol. I).

UN OHCHR, Internet shutdowns: trends, causes, legal implications and impacts on a range of human rights, A/HRC/50/55, (19 August 2022).

UN OHCHR, The right to privacy in the digital age, UN doc. A/HRC/51/17 (4 August 2022).

Case Law

CJEU, judgment (Grand Chamber) of 13 May 2014 in Case C-131/12, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González.

ECtHR, Bulgakov v. Russia, No. 20159/15, Judgment of 23 June 2020.

ECtHR Delfi AS v. Estonia, No. 64569/09, Judgment of 16 June 2015, [GC].

ECtHR, Engels v. Russia, No. 61919/16, Judgment of 23 June 2020.

ECtHR, Glukhin v. Russia, No. 11519/20, Judgment of 4 July 2023.

ECtHR, Hurbain v. Belgium, No. 57292/16, Judgment of 4 July 2023, [GC].

ECtHR, Marckx v. Belgium, No. 6833/74, Judgment of 13 June 1979.

ECtHR, OOO Flavus and Others v. Russia, No. 12468/15, 23489/15 and 19074/16, Judgment of 23 June 2020.

ECtHR, Sanchez v. France, No. 45581/15, Judgment of 15 May 2023, [GC].

ECtHR, Times Newspapers Ltd v. United Kingdom (Nos. 1 and 2), Nos. 3002/03

and 23676/03, Judgment of 10 March 2009.

ECtHR, Tyrer v. United Kingdom, No. 5856/72, Judgment of 25 April 1978.

ECtHR, Vladimir Kharitonov v. Russia, No. 10795/14, Judgment of 23 June 2020.

ECtHR, Yildirim v. Turkey, No. 64569/09, Judgment of 18 December 2012.

Wisconsin Supreme Court, Loomis v. Wisconsin, 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 2290 (2017).

Internet Sources

Amnesty International, 2022, Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression: Threats To Media Posed By Unlawful Targeted Surveillance, (https://www.ohchr.org/sites/ default/files/documents/issues/expression/cfis/threats-digital-age/csos/2023–01– 26/Submission-SR%20freedex-hrc50-Amnesty%20Int.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

AP, 2024, Faced with possibly paying for news, Google removes links to California news sites for some users, (https://apnews.com/article/california-goog- le-news-link-tax-0921cc2b39de591c173201e1ec4bee64, 26. 09. 2024).

ARTICLE 19, 2017, ARTICLE 19 at the UNHRC: The same rights that people have offline must also be protected online, (https://www.article19.org/resources/ article-19-at-the-unhrc-the-same-rights-that-people-have-offline-must-also-be- protected-online/, 26. 09. 2024).

Australian Human Rights Commission, Quick Guide: Direct Discrimination, (https://humanrights.gov.au/quick-guide/12026, 02. 06. 2024).

Australian Human Rights Commission, Quick Guide: Indirect Discrimination, (https://humanrights.gov.au/quick-guide/12049, 02. 06. 2024).

Barlow, J. P., 1996, Declaration on the Independence of the Cyberspace, Electronic Frontier Foundation, (https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence, 26. 09. 2024).

The Canadian Press, 2024, Online streaming services must now pay into fund for Canadian news, content, (https://globalnews.ca/news/10544374/on- line-streaming-services-fund-crtc/, 26. 09. 2024).

Council of Europe, 2021, Children’s data protection in an education set- ting – Guidelines (2021), (https://edoc.coe.int/en/children-and-theinter- net/9620-childrens-data-protection-in-an-education-setting-guidelines.html, 26. 09. 2024).

Digital Watch, 2024, Landmark agreement reached on Council of Europe’s AI treaty, Geneva Internet Platform, (https://dig.watch/updates/landmark-agree- ment-reached-on-council-of-europes-ai-treaty, 26. 09. 2024).

European Commission, Digital Education Initiatives, (https://education.ec.eu- ropa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/about-digital-education, 26. 09. 2024).

The European Data Protection Board, 2020, Guidelines 5/2019 on the criteria of the Right to be Forgotten in the search engines cases under the GDPR, (https:// www.edpb.europa.eu/our-work-tools/our-documents/guidelines/guidelines- 52019-criteria-right-be-forgotten-search-engines_en, 26. 09. 2024).

Global Legal Monitor, 2021, Germany: Constitutional Court Rejects Challenge to Pandemic Prohibition of In-Person Classes; Finds Constitutional Right to Education, Library of Congress, (https://www.loc.gov/item/global-legal-monitor/2021–12–14/ germany-constitutional-court-rejects-challenge-to-pandemic-prohibi- tion-of-in-person-classes-finds-constitutional-right-to-education/, 26. 09. 2024).

Google Advisory Council, 2015, Advisory Council to Google on the Right to Be Forgotten, Report of 6 February 2015, (https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/ archive.google/en//advisorycouncil/advisement/advisory-report.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

Gstrein, Oskar J., 2022, The Right to be Forgotten in 2022, Verfassungsblog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/rtbf-2022/, 26. 09. 2024).

Hern, A., 2024, Google stops notifying publishers of ‘right to be forgotten’ re- movals from search results, The Guardian, (https://www.theguardian.com/tech- nology/2024/feb/15/google-stops-notifying-publishers-of-right-to-be-forgotten- removals-from-search-results, 26. 09. 2024).

Meta Transparency Center, Policies, (https://transparency.meta.com/policies, 26. 09. 2024).

Methven O’Brien, C., Jørgensen, R. F., Hogan, B. F., 2021, Tech Giants and Hu- man Rights: Investor Expectations, The Danish Institute for Human Rights, (https://www.humanrights.dk/files/media/document/Tech%20giants%20and%20 human%20rights_2021.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

Microsoft Learn, 2024, Adopt responsible and trusted AI, (https://learn.micro- soft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/strategy/responsible-ai, 26. 09. 2024).

OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, 2023, Communiqué No. 1/2023 on the Use of Digital Surveillance Technology on Journalists, (https://www.osce. org/files/f/documents/9/4/551605.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

OSCE Office of Representative on Freedom of Media, 2021, Spotlight on Artificial Intelligence and Freedom of Expression: A Policy Manual, (https://www.osce.org/ files/f/documents/8/f/510332_1.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

REYN-Hrvatska, 2020, Djeca Romi koja su nastavom na daljinu ostala na obrazovnoj distanci, (http://www.reyn-hrvatska.net/index.php/2020/04/23/djeca-romi-ko- ja-su-nastavom-na-daljinu-ostala-na-obrazovnoj-distanci/, 26. 09. 2024).

RFI, 2024, French media progress against X in legal battle over payments, https:// www.rfi.fr/en/international-news/20240523-french-media-progress-against-x-in- legal-battle-over-payments, 26. 09. 2024).

The Toronto Declaration: Protecting the Right to Equality and Non-Discrimina- tion in Machine Learning Systems, (https://www.torontodeclaration.org/declara- tion-text/english/, 05. 06. 2024).

UNESCO, 2023, Technology and education in light of human rights, (https://www. right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/ RTE_Technology%20and%20education%20in%20light%20of%20human%20 rights_GEM%20Background%20Papers_July23.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

UNESCO, 2020, COVID-19 Response Remote Learning Strategy, (https://unes- doc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373764, 26. 09. 2024).

UN Office on Genocide Prevention, 2023, Countering and Addressing Online Hate Speech: A Guide for Policy Makers and Practitioners, (https://www.un.org/en/geno- cideprevention/documents/publications-and-resources/Countering_Online_Hate_ Speech_Guide_policy_makers_practitioners_July_2023.pdf, 29. 09. 2024).

UN OHCHR, Human Rights 75, High-level Event, The Future of Human Rights and Digital Technologies, Additional background document, (https://www. ohchr.org/sites/default/files/udhr/publishingimages/75udhr/HR75-high-lev- el-event-Digital-Technologies-Background-document.pdf, 26. 09. 2024).

Other Sources

Celeste, E., Gregorio, G. de, 2023, Towards a Right to Digital Education? Constitutional Challenges of Edtech, JIPITEC, Vol. 14., No. 2, pp. 234–250.

Declaration of Principles, Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium, Document WSIS-03/GENEVA/DOC/4-E (12 December 2023), (WSIS: Declaration of Principles (itu.int), 10. 10. 2024).

EC Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines (14 EN WP225) on the implementation of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment on “Google Spain and Inc V. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (Aepd) and Mario Costeja González” C-131/12.

International Commission on the Futures of Education, 2021, Reimagining Our Futures Together: a New Social Contract for Education, Paris, UNESCO.

Published
2024/12/25
Section
Review Paper