KA EVROPSKOM PRAVU O ZAŠTITI PODATAKA: SUDSKA PRAKSA SUDA PRAVDE EU I NJEN UTICAJ NA NACIONALNE ODŠTETNE ZAKONE
Abstract
U ovom radu se analiziraju odredbe o nematerijalnoj šteti zbog povrede prava na zaštitu ličnih podataka prema Opštoj uredbi o zaštiti podataka (GDPR) i njihovo tumačenje u praksi Suda pravde EU. Poseban fokus je na presudama u kojima Sud stvara autonomne, ali nedovoljno precizne pravne pojmove, što dovodi do pravne nesigurnosti i komplikacija u primeni propisa na nacionalnom nivou. Iako je Sud pravde EU procenu iznosa odštete prepustio nacionalnim sudovima, u radu se ističe da je u praksi nemoguće odvojiti uslove naknade štete od postupka određivanja visine odštete.
References
Bibliography
Abramović, A., 2004, Odgovornost za štetu nastalu objavom informacije, Hrvatska pravna revija, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 32–42.
Angelopoulos, C., 2012, The Myth of European Term Harmonisation: 27 Public Domains for the 27 Member States, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 43, No. 5, pp. 567–594.
Bar, C. von, 1998, The Common European Law of Torts, Vol. 2, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bar, C. von, Clive, E., Schulte-Nölke, N., 2009, Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law: Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR), Munich, Sellier.
Baretić, M., 2006, Pojam i funkcije neimovinske štete prema novom Zakonu o obveznim odnosima, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu, special issue, No. 56, pp. 461–500.
Boom, W. van, 2010, Comparative Notes on Injunction and Wrongful Risk-Taking, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 10–31.
Brüggemeier, G. et al., 2010, Personality Rights in European Tort Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Dunne, N., 2016, Antitrust and the Making of European Tort Law, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 366–399.
Fasquelle, D., Mesa, R., 2005, Les fautes lucratives et les assurances de dommages,
Revue générale du droit des assurances, No. 2, pp. 351–385.
Giliker, P., What do we mean by EU tort law, in: Giliker, P., (ed.), 2017, Research
Handbook on EU Tort Law, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 1–26.
Heijer, M. van den et al., 2019, On the Use and Misuse of Recitals in European
Union Law, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper, No. 2019–31.
Howells, G., Is European Product Liability Harmonised?, in: Koziol, H., Schulze, R., (eds.), 2008, Tort and Insurance Law, Vol. 23: Tort Law of the European Com- munity, Vienna–New York, Springer.
Humble, K., 2020, Human Rights, International Law and the Right to Privacy, Journal of Internet Law, Vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 14–23.
Infantino, M., Zervogianni, E., 2019, Unravelling Causation in European Tort Laws, Three Commonplaces through the Lens of Comparative Law, RabelsZ, Vol. 83, pp. 647–673.
Janeček, V., Teixeira Santos, C., 2024, The autonomous concept of “damage” according to the GDPR and its unfortunate implications: Österreichische Post, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 61, No. 2, pp. 531–544.
Knetsch, J., 2022, The Compensation of Non-Pecuniary Loss in GDPR Infringe- ment Cases, Journal of European Tort Law, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 132–153.
Kohutis, E., McCall, S., 2020, The Eggshell and Crumbling Skull Plaintiff: Psycho- logical and Legal Considerations for Assessment, Psychological Injury and Law, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1–16.
Koziol, H., 2013, Harmonising Tort Law in the European Union: Advantages and Difficulties, ELTE Law Journal, No. 1, pp. 73–88.
Lahe, J., 2011, Punitive Damages in Estonian Tort Law?, Journal of European Tort Law, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 280–293.
Maganić, A., Zaštita prava osobnosti, in: Vukadinović, D. V., (ed.), 2009, Zbornik radova – Trideset godina Zakona o obligacionim odnosima – de lege lata i de lege ferenda, Belgrade, GTZ, pp. 422–445.
Mańko, R., 2015, EU competence in private law – The Treaty framework for a European private law and challenges for coherence, Brussels: European Parlia- mentary Research Service.
Marcos, F., Sanchez, A., 2008, Damages for breach of the EC antitrust rules: har- monizing tort law through the back door?, InDret, No. 1, pp. 1–18.
Mrvić-Petrović, N., 1991, Naknada štete kao alternativna krivična sankcija, Ju- goslovenska revija za kriminologiju i krivično pravo, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 52–83.
Müller, P., 2000, Punitive Damages and Deutsches Schadensersatzrecht, Berlin, De Gruyter.
Neethling, J., 2005, Personality rights: a comparative overview, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 210–245.
Piątek, W., 2019, The right to an effective remedy in European law: significance, content and interaction, China–EU Law J, Vol. 6, No. 3–4, pp. 163–174.
Počuča, M., 2008, Naknada nematerijalne štete zbog pretrpljenog straha, Novi Sad, Privredna akademija.
Radolović, A., 2006, Pravo osobnosti u novom Zakonu o obveznim odnosima, Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 129–170.
Vizner, B., 1978, Komentar Zakona o obveznim odnosima, Vol. 2, Zagreb.
Winiger, B. et al., (eds.), 2011, Essential Cases on Damage, Berlin, Walter de
Gruyter.
Legislative Sources
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, 2012/C 326/02, 14 De- cember 2007.
Civil Code of Austria, Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch für die gesammten deutschen Erbländer der Oesterreichischen Monarchie StF: JGS Nr. 946/1811 (ABGB).
Code Civil of the French Republic, 1804.
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights
(OJ 1995 L 173).
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1768/95 of 24 July 1995 implementing rules on
the agricultural exemption provided for in Article 14 (3) of Council Regulation
(EC) No. 2100/94 on Community plant variety rights (OJ 1995 L 173, p. 14).
Constitution of Italy, 1947.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October
on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal
data and on the free movement of such data.
German Civil Code, Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch in der Fassung der Bekanntma-
chung vom 2. Januar 2002 (BGB) l. I S. 42, 2909; 2003 I S. 738), das zuletzt durch
Artikel 4 des Gesetzes vom 7. April 2025 (BGBl. 2025 I Nr. 109).
Italian Civil Code (approved by Royal Decree No. 262 of March 16, 1942, and
amended up to Decree No. 291 of December 7, 2016).
Law of Contracts and Torts of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Zakon o
obligacionim odnosima, Official Gazette of the SFRY, Nos. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89; Official Gazette of the Federation of BiH, Nos. 2/92, 13/93, 13/94; Official Gazette of Republika Srpska, Nos. 17/93, 3/96, 39/03, 74/04).
Law of Contracts and Torts of Serbia (Zakon o obligacionim odnosima, Official Gazette of the SFRY, Nos. 29/78, 39/85, 45/89 – decision of the Constitutional Court of Yugoslavia 57/89; Official Gazette of the FRY, No. 31/93; Official Gazette of SCG, No. 1/2003 – Constitutional Charter; Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 18/2020).
Obligations Act of Croatia (Zakon o obveznim odnosima, Official Gazette, Nos. 35/2005, 41/2008, 125/2011, 78/2015, 29/2018, 126/2021, 114/2022, 156/2022, 155/2023).
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation).
Swiss Code of Obligations, 220 Federal Act of 30 March 1911 on the Amendment of the Swiss Civil Code (Part Five: The Code of Obligations).
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), OJ C 115/47, 9 May 2008.
Case Law
Bundesgerichtshof (BGH), 23 January 1951, GSZ 1/50, BGHZ 2, 263.
Cass. civ., Sez. III, 31 May 2003, No. 8827, Giur. It. 2003, 2205.
CJEU, Case C-182/22, Scalable Capital, ECLI:EU:C:2024:1123.
CJEU, Case C-200/23, Agentsia po vpisvaniyata v. OL, ECLI:EU:C:2024:827.
CJEU, Case C-590/22, AT, ECLI: EU:C:2024:536.
CJEU, Case C-687/21, MediaMarktSaturn, ECLI: EU:C:2024:72.
CJEU, Case C-741/21, GP v. juris GmbH, ECLI: EU:C:2024:288.
CJEU, Case C-507/23, A v. Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības centrs, ECLI:EU:C:2024:854.
CJEU, Case C-300/21, UI v. Österreichische Post, ECLI:EU:C:2023:317.
CJEU, Case C-340/21, VB v. Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, ECLI:EU:C:2023:908.
CJEU, Case C-456/22, VX, ECLI:EU:C:2023:999.
CJEU, Case C-667/21, Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, ECLI: EU:C:2023:1022.
Cour de cassation, 2e civ., 28 May 1954, D. 1954.649.
Cour de cassation, 1re civ., 21 November 2006, No. 05–15.690, Bull. civ. I, No. 507.
ECtHR, Sunday Times v. The United Kingdom, Application No. 6538/74, 26 April 1979.
General Court of the European Union, Case T-354/22.
H West & Son Ltd v. Shephard [1964] AC 326 (HL), at 347–349.
Trib. di Milano, 8 July 2003, in: Nuova giurisprudenza civile commentata 2004, I, 260
Internet Sources
European Data Protection Supervisor, n.d., Data Protection, (https://edps.europa. eu/data-protection/data-protection_en, 28. 3. 2025).
Khalil, S., 2023, EU: CJEU Lowers Threshold for GDPR Damages, (https://www. schoenherr.eu/content/eu-cjeu-lowers-threshold-for-gdpr-damages/, 8. 5. 2023).
Other Sources
Baremo tables (Ley 35/2015, de 22 de septiembre, de reforma del sistema para la valoración de los daños y perjuicios causados a las personas en accidentes de circulación).
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA), 2013, Access to Data Protection Remedies in the EU Member States, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
Judicial College, 2022, Guidelines for the Assessment of General Damages in Personal Injury Cases, 16th ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona, 6 October 2022, Case C-300/21, UI v. Österreichische Post AG.
Opinion of Advocate General Collins, 26 October 2023, Joined Cases C-182/22 and C-189/22, Scalable Capital.
Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella in VB v. Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, Case C-340/21, EU:C:2023:353.
Tabella Unica Nazionale, Presidential Decree No. 12/2025.