ZAŠTITA RAVNOPRAVNOSTI STRANA UGOVORNICA U BRAČNOM UGOVORU

Bogdana M Stjepanović; Jovana Rajić Ćalić

doi:10.5937/pravzap16-60787

Bogdana M Stjepanović Institut za uporedno pravo
Jovana Rajić Ćalić Institute of Comparative law https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4658-3451

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap16-60787

Keywords: bračni ugovor, ravnopravnost ugovornih strana, autonomija volјe, pravne zaštite, uporedno pravo, teorija relacionih ugovora, imovina

Abstract

Zaštita ravnopravnosti ugovornih strana u bračnom ugovoru je klјučni preduslov za postizanje pravičnosti u ovom pravnom odnosu. Rad analizira potencijalna rešenja i predlaže načine za njihovu integraciju u srpski pravni sistem, u nedostatku adekvatnih mehanizama za zaštitu ravnopravnosti ugovornih strana.

Glavni fokus istraživanja je na konkretnim pravnim mehanizmima, uz uzimanje u obzir autonomije volјe i kratak prikaz teorija relacionih ugovora o njihovoj dinamičnoj prirodi. Rad sprovodi temelјnu analizu zaštitnih mera kako za formiranje tako i za izvršenje ugovora, izvlačeći bitne pouke iz nemačkog građanskog prava koje je razvilo sofisticirane sisteme sudske revizije. Istraživanje takođe procenjuje kako principi rodne ravnopravnosti doprinose rešavanju prethodnih pravnih nejednakosti koje su postojale u ovim sporazumima.

U istraživanju su izloženi specifični mehanizmi koje treba implementirati u srpski pravni sistem, uz korišćenje doktrinarnih i uporednopravnih metoda.

References

Bibliography

Bix, B., The ALI Principles and Agreements: Seeking a Balance between Status and Contract, in: Wilson, R., (ed.), 2006, Reconceiving the Family: Critique on the American Law Institute’s Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 372–392.

Blagojević Hughson, M., 2011, Rodni barometar u Srbiji: Razvoj i svakodnevni život, UNDP, Belgrade.

Boele-Woelki, K., Ferrand, F. et al., 2013, Principles of European Family Law Regarding Relations Between Spouses, Cambridge, Intersentia.

Buddhapriya, S., 2009, Work-family challenges and their impact on career decisions: a study of Indian woman professionals, Vikalpa, No. 34, pp. 31–46.

Code, L., 1991, Second Persons, What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

Fredman, S., 1997, Women and the Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Hitchings, E., 2011, Law Commission Report: A study of the views and approaches of family practitioners concerning marital property agreements, Bristol, University of Bristol School of Law.

Iasechko, S. et al., 2022, Marriage Contract as a Regulator of Non-Property Relations Comparative Characteristics of Ukrainian and European Legislation, Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 17–22.

Kingdom, E., 2000, Cohabitation Contracts and the Democratization of Personal Relations, Feminist Legal Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 5–27.

Kovaček-Stanić, G., Samardžić, S. O., 2016, Zaštita slabijeg partnera u ugovornom bračno-imovinskom režimu, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, No. 4, pp. 1047–1065.

Kovačević, Lj., 2021, Zasnivanje radnog odnosa, Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Kovačević, N., Marković, Ž., Nikolić, N., 2014, Ljudska prava u Srbiji, Belgrade, Beogradski centar za lјudska prava.

Kring, S. A., Kawar, M., 2009, Guidelines on Gender in Employment Policies, Geneva, International Labour Office.

Misailović, J., 2020, Posebna radnopravna zaštita materinstva, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, Vol. 86, No. 59, pp. 237–252.

Pintens, W., Matrimonial Property Law in Europe, in: Boele-Woelki, K., Miles, J., Scherpe, J. M., (eds.), 2011, The Future of Family Property in Europe, Cambridge, Intersentia, pp. 19–46.

Politakis, G., 2001, Night Work of Women in Industry: Standards and Sensibility, International Labour Review, No. 140, pp. 403–428.

Rajić Ćalić, J., 2023, The Importance of the Principle of Equal Treatment of Men and Women in European Union Law, Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, Vol. XCV, No. 3, pp. 976–1015.

Rajić Ćalić, J., Bračni i porodični status kao zabranјeni osnov diskriminacije – opšti osvrt, in: Ćeranić, D. et al., (eds.), 2024, Legal Gaps and the Completeness of Law, Vol. 2, Pale, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu, pp. 348–366.

Regan, M., 1999, Alone Together: Law and the Meaning of Marriage, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Reljanović, M., Rajić Ćalić, J., 2024, Menstrual leave and gender equality, Strani pravni život, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 1–14.

Stanciulescu, M., 2009, Politica si gen in Balcani. Modele patriarhale in Europa de sud-est, Jumalui de Studii Juridice, Vol. IV, No. 1–2, pp. 180–191.

Stjepanović, B., 2024, Bračni ugovor u pojedinim aktima Evropske unije, Evropsko zakonodavstvo, Vol. 23, No. 87–88, pp. 62–74.

Stjepanović, B., 2024, Harmonization of Family Law in the EU with Special Reference to the Marriage Contract, Balkan Social Science Review, Vol. 23, pp. 149–167.

Stjepanović, B., 2024, The Principle of Autonomy of the Will and the Marriage Contract, Legal Gaps and the Completeness of Law, Vol. 3, Pale, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Istočnom Sarajevu, pp. 251–271.

Thompson, S., 2015, Prenuptial Agreements and the Presumption of Free Choice – Issues of Power in Theory and Practice, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing.

Thompson, S., 2018, Feminist Relational Contract Theory: A New Model for Family Property Agreements, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 617–645.

Legislative Sources

Code Civil (French Civil Code), Ordonnance No. 2016-131 of 10 February 2016 on the Reform of Contract Law, the General Regime of Obligations, and Proof of Obligations.

Family Act of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 18/2005, 72/2011 – other law, and 6/2015.

Family Act of the Russian Federation, Семейный кодекс Российской Федера- ции, N 223-ФЗ of 29 December 1995.

German Civil Code, Civil Code in the version promulgated on 2 January 2002 (Federal Law Gazette [Bundesgesetzblatt] I page 42, 2909; 2003 I page 738), last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 10 August 2021 (Federal Law Gazette I p. 3515).

Case Law

BVerfG, Judgment of the First Senate of 6 February 2001 – 1 BvR 12/92, paras. 1–56, (https://www.bverfg.de/e/rs20010206_1bvr001292en, 3. 10. 2025).

UKSC, Radmacher (formerly Granatino) (Respondent) v. Granatino (Appellant), 2009 EWCA Civ 649, 10 October 2010, (https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/ docs/uksc-2009-0031-judgment _db72197d25.pdf, 3. 10. 2025).

Internet Sources

Council of Europe Committee of Ministers, Recommendation No. R (98) 1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on Family Mediation, (https://rm.coe. int/rec-98-1e-on-family-mediation/1680a3b3ef, 1. 2. 2025).

Council of Europe Committee of Ministers, Resolution (78) 37 on Equality of Spouses in Civil Law, (https://rm.coe.int/res-78-37e-on-the-equality-of-spouses- in-civil-law/1680a3b3f1, 1. 2. 2025).

The Preliminary Draft of the Serbian Civil Code, (https://www.paragraf.rs/na- crti_i_predlozi/280519-prednacrt-gradjanskog-zakonika-republike-srbije.html, 9. 10. 2025).

Other Sources

American Law Institute, 2001, Principles of the Law of Family Dissolution: Analysis and Recommendations, Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1–85.

Gender Equality Commission, 2016, Gender Equality Glossary, Strasbourg, Council of Europe.

RAND Europe, 2014, Gender Equality in Workforce: Reconciling Work, Private and Family Life in Europe, Brussels, RAND.