PRAVNO RASUĐIVANJE HOMO IURIDICUS-A
Abstract
Predmet članka je metoda idealtipskih koncepata koju sam primenio u knjizi „Osnovi pravnog rasuđivanja“. Pošto knjiga sadrži samo nekoliko raštrkanih beležaka o toj temi, javila se ideja da se, u posebnom članku, detaljnije objasni primenjena metoda i njeni efekti. U knjizi je idealni tip konstruisan kao homo iuridicus, subjekt pravnog rasuđivanja, kojeg pri rasuđivanju motivišu isključivo autoritativni pravni razlozi. On je racionalan, a ne stvarno postojeći, agent. Pokazuje se da je idealni tip pogodan način da se konceptualizuje pravno rasuđivanje, a da se ne zalazi u idiosinkrazije rasuđivanja konkretnih pravnika ili zajednice pravnika unutar pojedinih sistema. Kada se rasuđivanje takvog homo iuridicus-a uporedi s onim što se događa u stvarnosti, uočava se da sudije svoje odluke niti donose niti opravdavaju autoritativnim pravnim razlozima u svakom konkretnom sporu. Na taj način se pokazuje korisnost Veberove ideje ideal-tipskih koncepta za jurisprudenciju.
References
Balkin, J., 1993, Understanding Legal Understanding: The Legal Subject and the Problem of Legal Coherence, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 105–176.
Basta, D. N., 2001, Slobodan Jovanović i Hans Kelzen, Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, Vol. 49, No. 1–4, pp. 25–43.
Brugger, W., 1994, Legal Interpretation, Schools of Jurisprudence, and Anthropology: Some Remarks From a German Point of View, American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 395–420.
Chauvin, T., 2014, Homo iuridicus. Człowiek jako podmiot prawa publicznego (Homo iuridicus. Man as a subject of public law), Warsaw, C. H. Beck.
Coleman, J. L., 1998, Incorporationism, Conventionality, and the Practical Difference Thesis, Legal Theory, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 381–425.
Dajović, G., 2023, Osnovi pravnog rasuđivanja (The fundamentals of legal reasoning), Belgrade, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.
Elgin, C. Z., 2017, True Enough, Cambridge, MA, London, The MIT Press.
Feteris, E., Argumentative patterns with symptomatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions, in: Eemeren, F. H. van, (ed.), 2017, Prototypical Argumentative Patterns. Exploring the relationship between argumentative discourse and institutional context, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 125–138.
Finnis, J., 2011, Natural Law and Natural Rights, Oxford, Clarendon Law – Oxford University Press.
Galligan, D., 2015, Concepts the currency of social understanding of law: A review essay on the later work of William Twining, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 373–402.
Harašić, Ž., 2006, Problem razgraničenja „lakih slučajeva“ (easy cases) i „teških slučajeva“ (hard cases), Zbornik PFZ, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 85–116.
Hart, H. L. A., 1994, The Concept of Law, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
Holmes, O. W., 1897, The Path of Law, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 457–478.
Kahneman, D., 2011, Thinking Fast and Slow, New York, Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kaplan, J., 2017, Attitude and The Normativity of Law, Law and Philosophy, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 469–493.
MacCormick, N., 1993, Argumentation and Interpretation in Law, Ratio Juris, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 16–29.
Reed, I., 2011, Interpretation and Social Knowledge. On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences, Chicago – London, The University of Chicago Press.
Rheinstein, M., Introduction, in: Weber, M., 1954, Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society, Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, pp. xxvi–lxxii.
Ringer, F., 1997, Max Weber’s Methodology: The Unification of the Cultural and Social Sciences, Cambridge MA, London, Harvard University Press.
Schauer, F., 2004, Limited Domain of The Law, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 7, pp. 1909–1956.
Schilfgaarde, P. van, 2019, Law and Life. Why Law?, Cham, Springer Nature.
Shapiro, S. J., 2006, What is the internal point of view, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 1157–1170.
Shecaira, F. P., 2015, Sources of Law Are not Legal Norms, Ratio Juris, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 15–30.
Schütz, A., 1967, The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, Northwestern University Press.
Tamanaha, B. Z., 2006, A Socio-Legal Methodology for the Internal/External Dis- tinction: Jurisprudential Implications, Fordham Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 1255–1274.
Vandevelde, K. J., 2011, Thinking Like a Lawyer: An Introduction to Legal Reasoning, 2nd ed., Boulder, Westview Press.
Weber, M., 1917, Der Sinn der “Wertfreiheit” der soziologischen und ökonomischen Wissenschaften, Logos, Vol. 7, pp. 40–88.
Weber, M., 1946, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York, Oxford University Press.
Weber, M., 1949, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Glencoe, Free Press.
Weber, M., 1978, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, Berkeley – Los Angeles – London, University of California Press.