SUDSKI NARATIVNI SUVERENITET: NORMALIZACIJA VANREDNOG STANJA KROZ NEUSTAVNE USTAVNE AMANDMANE U VREMENIMA KRIZE
Abstract
Ovaj rad istražuje ulogu sudova u vremenima krize i vanrednog stanja. Fokusira se na napetost između imaginarnih konceptualizacija statusa sudova u normalnim i vremenima vanrednog stanja koji postoje u teorijskom diskursu i ustavnoj antropologiji. Takođe, ovaj rad istražuje i empirijske načine na koje sudovi doprinose normalizaciji vanrednog stanja u društveno-pravnoj praksi, opravdavajući krizu i vanredno stanje kao „novu normalnost“. Rad opisuje nekoliko ključnih ustavnih pretpostavki u vezi sa sudovima u normalnim vremenima. Pretpostavke su strukturirane kroz analitičku rekonstrukciju glavnih pristupa konceptu sudova koje pruža savremeni konstitucionalizam, u nastojanju da se opravda pravilno angažovanje sudova u upravljanju ustavnim krizama. Ova rekonstrukcija ima za cilj da proizvede novi pristup ulozi sudova i originalnu tipologiju pretpostavki o sudovima.
References
Bibliography
Agamben, G., 2019, Homo Sacer II, Sofia, Critique and Humanism Publishing House (in Bulgarian).
Belov, M., Crisis as Opportunity and Emergency as Normalcy in the Transformative Age, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2026, Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism, London, Palgrave, pp. 1–23.
Belov, M., (ed.), 2026, Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism, London, Palgrave.
Belov, M., Pulsing Constitutionalism and the Dichotomy between Dark and Bright Constitutionalism as Driving Force in Constitutional Space-Time, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2026, Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 297–307.
Belov, M., Constitutional Transitions and Transitional Imaginaries: Bridging Leg- acies of the Constitutional Past and Aspirations for the Constitutional Future, in: Belov, M., Florczak-Wątor, M., (eds.), 2024, Constitutional Traditions and Constitutional Transitions: Legal and Socio-Legal Perspectives, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 13–35.
Belov, M., Imaginaries of Representation: There and Back Again, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2025, Representative Democracy in Flux: Deconstructive Narratives from a Legal and Constitutional Perspective, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 17–49.
Belov, M., 2024, Transitory Imaginaries in Central and Eastern Europe: Reconsidering Constitutional Tradition and Constitutional Transition from Symbolic-Imaginary Perspective, Review of Central and East European Law, Vol. 49, Nos. 2–4.
Belov, M., 2023, The Conceptual Shapes of Constitutional Polycrisis: Deconstruction, Asymmetries and Post-Modern Anxieties of Constitutional Normalcy, Irish Jurist, Vol. 70, pp. 393–410.
Belov, M., 2023, Rule of Law in Europe in Times of Constitutional Polycrisis, Constitutional Polytransition and Democratic Discontent, Diritto pubblico com- parato ed europeo, Rivista trimestrale, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 875–884.
Belov, M., Rule of Law and Democracy in Times of Transitory Constitutionalism, Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism: Towards a Global Algorithmic Technocracy?, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2023, Rule of Law in Crisis: Con- stitutionalism in a State of Flux, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 21–47.
Belov, M., 2022, Constitutional Semiotics. The Conceptual Foundations of a Constitutional Theory and Meta-Theory, Oxford, Hart Publishing.
Belov, M., 2022, Three Models for Ordering Constitutional Orders, Pravni zapisi, No. 2, pp. 361–387.
Belov, M., Mastering emergency situations: The activist role of the Bulgarian Constitutional Court in redefining the constitutional design of war, state of siege and state of emergency, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Courts and Judicial Activism under Crisis Conditions: Policy Making in a Time of Illiberalism and Emergency Constitutionalism, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 171–194.
Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Courts and Judicial Activism under Crisis Conditions: Pol- icy Making in a Time of Illiberalism and Emergency Constitutionalism, Abingdon, Routledge.
Belov, M., Tsekov, A., The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria as Law Maker, in: Florczak-Wator, M., (ed.), 2020, Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts, Abingdon, Routledge.
Belov, M., Judicial Dialogue: Westphalian or post-Westphalian Constitutional Phenomenon, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2019a, Judicial Dialogue, The Hague, Eleven, pp. 25–51.
Belov, M., Global Rule of Law instead of Global Democracy? Legitimacy of Global Judicial Empire on the Edge between Westphalian and post-Westphalian Constitutionalism, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2019b, The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders, The Hague, Eleven, pp. 99–133.
Benjamin, W., 2003, Über den Begriff der Geschichte, textz.com, (http://www. burg-halle.de/home/129_baetzner/SoSe_2017/benjamin_Ueber_den_Begriff_ der_Geschichte.pdf, 23. 8. 2023).
Benjamin, W., 1999, Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. II.1, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp.
Carrese, P., 2003, The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Claus, L., 2004, Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation, University of San Diego Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series, Art. 11.
Durantaye, L. de la, 2009, Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction, Redwood City, Stanford University Press.
Dworkin, R., 2003, Law’s Empire, Oxford, Hart.
Gardasevic, Dj., Activism of the Croatian Constitutional Court and COVID-19: A Bridge Too Far, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2021, Courts and Judicial Activism under Crisis Conditions: Policy Making in a Time of Illiberalism and Emergency Constitu- tionalism, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 194–213.
Gava, J., 2001, The Rise of the Hero Judge, University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 747–759.
Hart, H. L. A., 1997, The Concept of Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Hausegger, L., Urribarri, R., (eds.), 2024, Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective, Frankfurt am Main, Peter Lang.
Heuschling, L., Foulquier, N., Brondel, S., 2001, Gouvernement des juges et démocratie, Paris, Publications de la Sorbonne.
Hirshl, R., 2007, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Hobsbawm, E., 1995, Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914–1991, New York, Time Warner Books.
Hobsbawm, E., 1996, The Age of Revolution: 1789–1848, New York, Vintage.
Jackson, R., 2007, Sovereignty: The Evolution of an Idea, Cambridge, Polity.
Jouvenel, B. de, 1998, Sovereignty: An Inquiry into the Political Good, Carmel, Liberty Fund.
Jarvad, M., Mathematical Thinking and International Law, in: Booß-Bavnbek, B., Høyrup, J., (eds.), 2003, Mathematics and War, Basel, Birkhäuser, pp. 367–389.
Kelemen, K., Miranda, L. de, 2024, Courts as Anthrobots: Learning from Human Forms of Interaction to Develop a Philosophically Healthy Model for Judicial Au- tomation, International Journal for Court Administration, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 1–24.
Kistner, U., 2011, The Exception and the Rule: Fictive, Real, Critical, Telos, Vol. 157, pp. 43–59.
Komárek, J., 2020, Political Economy in the European Constitutional Imaginary – Moving beyond Fiesole, Verfassungsblog, (https://verfassungsblog.de/politi- cal-economy-in-the-european-constitutional-imaginary-moving-beyond-fie- sole/, 18. 3. 2026).
Krakoff, S., A Narrative of Sovereignty: Illuminating the Paradox of the Domestic Dependent Nation, in: Christensen, G., Tatum, M., (eds.), 2019, Reading American Indian Law: Foundational Principles, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 188–210.
Krasner, S., 2024, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Luhmann, N., 2008, Law as a Social System, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Novaes, C. D., 2020, The Dialogical Roots of Deduction. Historical, Cognitive, and Philosophical Perspectives on Reasoning, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Massey, I. P., 1972, The Process of Amendment and The Constitution. A Study in Comparatives, Journal of the Indian Law Institute, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 407–419.
Montesquieu, C., 2010, De L’Esprit Des Lois, Whitefish, Kessinger Publishing.
Přibáň, J., 2018, Constitutional Imaginaries and Legitimation: On Potentia, Potestas, and Auctoritas in Societal Constitutionalism, Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 45, No. S1, pp. 30–51.
Přibáň, J., 2020, Constitutional Imaginaries. A Theory of European Societal Consti- tutionalism, Abingdon, Routledge.
Ronkainen, A., From spelling checkers to Robot Judges? Some implications of normativity in language technology and AI & law, in: Branting, K., Wyner, A., (eds.), 2021, Proceedings of the ICAIL 2011 workshop applying human language technology to law (Masaryk University), pp. 48–53.
Rouvillois, F., Boutin, Ch., 2023, Le gouvernement des juges, Paris, Desclée De Brouwer.
Roznai, Y., 2019, Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments: The Limits of Amendment Powers, Oxford, OUP.
Schmitt, C., 2005, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Schmitt, C., 1934, Über die drei Arten rechtswissenschaftlichen Denkens, Hamburg, Duncker&Humblot.
Shapiro, M., 1981, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis, Chicago, Univer- sity of Chicago Press.
Soper, P., 1977, Metaphors and Models of Law: The Judge as Priest, Michigan Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 5, pp. 1196–1213.
Spector, C., 2015, La bouche de la loi? Les figures du juge dans L’Esprit des lois, Montesquieu Law Review, No. 3, pp. 87–102.
Spruk, J., 2024, Montesquieu’s Image of a Judge in the Light of the Separation of Powers Doctrine, Pravnik, Vol. 79, Nos. 1–2. pp. 69–85.
Susskind, R., 2019, The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the nature of legal services, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Tanchev, E., Belov, M., 2008, Constitutional Gradualism: Adapting to EU Mem- bership and Improving the Judiciary in the Bulgarian Constitution, European Public Law, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 3–19.
Termini, M., 2019, Proving the Point: Connections Between Legal and Mathematical Reasoning, Suffolk U. L. Rev., Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 5–35.
Teubner, G., 2012, Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Vermeys, N., The Computer as the Court: How Will Artificial Intelligence Affect Judicial Processes?, in: Kramer, X., Biard, A., Hoevenaars, J., Themeli, E., (eds.), 2021, New Pathways to Civil Justice in Europe. Challenges of Access to Justice, Ber- lin, Springer, pp. 61–80.
Yowell, P., The negative legislator. On Kelsen’s idea of a constitutional court, in: Belov, M., (ed.), 2020, Courts, Politics and Constitutional Law. Judicialization of Politics and Politicization of the Judiciary, Abingdon, Routledge, pp. 125–152.