Factors Influencing Efficacy of Complete Decongestive Treatment in Patients with Breast Cancer-Linked Arm Lymphoedema

  • Dragana Bojinović-Rodić Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation „Dr Miroslav Zotović“, Banja Luka
  • Samra Pjanić Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation „Dr Miroslav Zotović“, Banja Luka
  • Tamara Popovic Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation „Dr Miroslav Zotović“, Banja Luka, Medical Faculty, University of Banja Luka2
  • Tatjana Nožica-Radulović Institute for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation „Dr Miroslav Zotović“, Banja Luka, Medical Faculty, University of Banja Luka2
Keywords: Breast cancer, Lymphoedema, Physical therapy modalities, Compression bandages, Drainage, Treatment outcome

Abstract


Background/Aim: The most recommended form of lymphoedema therapy is com-plete decongestive treatment (CDT). Efficacy of CDT in patients with arm lymph-oedema related to malignant breast tumour has reported in many studies, but the predictive factors of outcome of this therapy have not been yet sufficiently investi-gated.  The purpose of this research was to identify predictive factors of efficacy of CDT in patients with breast cancer-linked arm lymphoedema throughout the inten-sive phase of therapy.

Methods: The prospective study included 51 patients with breast cancer-linked arm lymphoedema who were subjected to a 3-week program of CDT. Patients' clini-cal and demographic features, breast cancer treatment characteristics, lymphoede-ma and CDT characteristics were collected and assessed for their prognostic value. The influence of certain predictors on the degree of lymphoedema reduction was evaluated by multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results: Mean age was 58.1 ± 8.0 (95 % CI: 55.8 - 60.3), median of BMI was 28.4 kg/m2 (95 % CI: 27.2 - 29.6). The average duration of lymphoedema was 36.5 ± 43.9 months (95 % CI: 24.1 - 48.8). The mean size of lymphoedema before CDT was 6.99 ± 5.36 %, and the mean degree of lymphoedema reduction was 63.7 ± 28.6 %. The mean compliance to bandages was 217.5 ± 97.8 hours (95 % CI: 190.0 - 245.0) and 7 (13.7 %) patients had a history of erysipelas of the ipsilateral arm. When observ-ing each individual predictor, statistically most significant contribution showed the size of lymphoedema before the therapy (p < 0.001), then history of erysipelas (p < 0.01), and patients' age (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Size of lymphoedema before treatment is the most crucial prognostic factor of the efficacy of CDT in the patients with breast cancer-linked arm lymph-oedema. The present study also identified history of erysipelas and patients age as independent predictors of the CDT efficacy.

References

Bains SK, Peters AM, Zammit C, Ryan N, Ballinger J, Glass DM, et al. Global abnormalities in lymphatic function following systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2015;102(5):534-40.

Cariati M, Bains SK, Grootendorst MR, Suyoi A, Peters AM, Mortimer P, et al. Adjuvant taxanes and the development of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema. Br J Surg 2015;102(9):1071-8.

Lopez Penha TR, van Roozendaal LM, Smidt ML, Boersma LJ, von Meyenfeldt MF, Voogd AC, et al. The changing role of axillary treatment in breast cancer: Who will remain at risk for developing arm morbidity in the future? Breast 2015;24(5):543-7.

Warren LE, Miller CL, Horick N, Skolny MN, Jammallo LS, Sadek BT, et al. The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014;88(3):565-71.

Sakorafas GH, Peros G, Cataliotti L, Vlastos G. Lymphedema following axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer. Surg Oncol 2006;15(3):153-65.

Armer JM, Hulett JM, Bernas M, Ostby P, Stewart BR, Cormier JN. Best-practice guidelines in assessment, risk reduction, management, and surveillance for post-breast cancer lymphedema. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2013;5(2):134–44.

Cheifetz O, Haley L. Management of secondary lymphedema related to breast cancer. Can Fam Physician 2010;56(12):1277-84.

Jeffs E, Ream E, Taylor C, Bick D. Clinical effectiveness of decongestive treatments on excess arm volume and patient-centered outcomes in women with early breast cancer-related arm lymphedema: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2018 Feb;16(2):453–506.

Borman P. Lymphedema diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up from the viewpoint of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil 2018 Sep;64(3):179–97.

Yamamoto R, Yamamoto T. Effectiveness of the treatment-phase of two-phase complex decongestive physiotherapy for the treatment of extremity lymphedema. Int J Clin Oncol 2007;12(6):463-8.

Koul R, Dufan T, Russell C, Guenther W, Nugent Z, Sun X, et al. Efficacy of complete decongestive therapy and manual lymphatic drainage on treatment-related lymfodema in breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007;67(3):841-6.

Karadibak D, Yavuzsen T, Saydam S. Prospective trial of intensive decongestive physiotherapy for upper extremity lymphedema. J Surg Oncol 2008;97(7):572-7.

Buragadda S, Alhusaini AA, Melam GR, Arora N. Effect of complete decongestive therapy and a home program for patients with post mastectomy lymphedema. J Phys Ther Sci 2015;27(9):2743-8.

Liao SF, Li SH, Huang HY, Chen ST, Kuo SJ, Chen DR, et al. The efficacy of complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) and predictive factors of lymphedema severity and response to CDP in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Breast 2013 Oct; 22(5):703-6.

Forner-Cordero I, Muñoz-Langa J, Forner-Cordero A, DeMiguel-Jimeno JM. Predictive factors of response to decongestive therapy in patients with breast-cancer-related lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol 2010 Mar;17(3):744-51.

Hamner JB, Fleming MD. Lymphedema therapy reduces the volume of edema and pain in patients with breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14(6):1904-8.

Liao SF, Li SH, Huang HY. The efficacy of complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP) and predictive factors of response to CDP in lower limb lymphedema (LLL) after pelvic cancer treatment. Gynecol Oncol 2012 Jun;125(3):712-5.

Vignes S, Simon L, Benoughidane B, Simon M, Fourgeaud C. Clinical and scintigraphic predictors of primary lower limb lymphedema-volume reduction during complete decongestive physical therapy. Phys Ther 2020 May 18;100(5):766-72.

Dalal A, Eskin-Schwartz M, Mimouni D, Ray S, Days W, Hodak E, et al. Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017 Jun 20;6(6):CD009758.

Jendoubi F, Rohde M, Prinz JC. Intracellular streptococcal uptake and persistence: a potential cause of erysipelas recurrence. Front Med (Lausanne) 2019 Jan 29;6:6.

Inghammar M, Rasmussen M, Linder A. Recurrent erysipelas - risk factors and clinical presentation. BMC Infect Dis 2014;14:270.

Vignes S, Porcher, Arrault M, Dupuy A. Factors influencing breast cancer-related lymphedema volume after intensive decongestive physiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2011 Jul;19(7):935-40.

Vignes S, Porcher R, Champagne A, Dupuy A. Predictive factors of response to intensive decongestive physiotherapy in upper limb lymphedema after breast cancer treatment: a cohort study. Breast cancer Res Treat 2006 Jul;98(1):1-6.

Lopez Penha TR, van Roozendaal LM, Smidt ML, Boersma LJ, von Meyenfeldt MF, Voogd AC, et al. The changing role of axillary treatment in breast cancer: Who will remain at risk for developing arm morbidity in the future? Breast 2015;24(5):543-7.

Basta MN, Fischer JP, Kanchwala SK, Silvestre J, Wu LC, Serletti JM, et al. A propensity-matched analysis of the influence of breast reconstruction on subsequent development of lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136(2):134-43.

Soran A, Menekse E, Girgis M, DeGore L, Johnson R. Breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection: does early postoperative prediction model work? Support Care Cancer 2016;24(3):1413-9.

Published
2021/06/29
Section
Original article