Distribution of CD15- and CD31-Positive Cells in the Oesophageal Mucosa of Children With Eosinophilic Oesophagitis Across Different Age and Sex Groups

  • Grigory Demyashkin Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-2600
  • Mikhail Shalatonin Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-9646
  • Daniil Yuferov I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
  • Alexander Thaler Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig; Leipzig, Germany https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5012-211X
  • Alexandr Tsibulevsky Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4449-7859
  • Tatyana Borovaya Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0155-5756
  • Kirill Blinov Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute for Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7195-2191
  • Amira Tuktarova Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München; Munich, Bavaria, Germany https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4568-1537
Keywords: Oesophagus, Eosinophilic Oesophagitis, Lewis x antigen, CD15, Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, CD31, Child

Abstract


Background/Aim: Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the oesophagus with a multifactorial nature. The prognosis and effectiveness of therapy for EoE largely depend on a detailed study of its pathogenetic mechanisms. To clarify the severity of the inflammatory process, along with routine histological methods, a comprehensive immunohistochemical examination of the oesophageal mucosa was performed. To verify the intensity of tissue alterations, the marker CD15 was used and to assess the state of the vascular bed and the degree of vascularisation, the endothelial marker CD31 was employed. The aim of this research was to determine the morphometric features of the inflammatory process and tissue vascularisation in EoE in children of different age and sex groups.

Methods: A retrospective study included 94 children with EoE (ICD-10: K20), stratified into three age subgroups: Subgroup A (3–7 years), Subgroup B (8–12 years) and Subgroup C (13–18 years). The study utilised clinical data and morphological methods (general histology, histochemical reactions – Masson's trichrome and Periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) and immunohistochemical analysis for CD15 and CD31) for examining biopsy material from the oesophageal mucosa.

Results: Distinct age- and sex-dependent patterns were identified. In male patients, peak CD15+ cell density was recorded in Subgroup A, demonstrating a significant 1.57-fold decrease toward the adolescent group (p < 0.05). Conversely, female patients demonstrated the lowest CD15+ density in Subgroup A, with a significant 1.89-fold increase in Subgroup C (p < 0.05), where female CD15+ density exceeded males by 1.94 times (p < 0.05). All assessed microvascular parameters progressively increased from Subgroup A to C in both sexes (p < 0.05). When comparing by sex in the older age cohort, the microvascular density in girls significantly exceeded that in boys by 1.18 times (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: EoE in children is characterised by distinct age- and sex-dependent inflammatory and structural changes in the oesophageal mucosa. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed prominent epithelial CD15 expression reflecting the intensity of cellular alteration and CD31+ endothelial reactivity reflecting a microvascular response during the development of the disease. The results underscore the importance of comprehensive diagnostics, including detailed morphological, histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the mucosa, which may provide valuable insights for improving diagnostic strategies and monitoring disease progression.

References

Underwood B, Troutman TD, Schwartz JT. Breaking down the complex pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023;130(1):28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.10.026.

Demyashkin GA, Shalatonin MP, Yuferov DY, Rostovskaya VV, Tsomartova DA, Shidlovskiy YV, et al. Features of the endoscopic and morphological patterns of the esophageal mucosa in eosinophilic esophagitis in children of different age groups. Molekulyarnaya Meditsina. 2026;24(2):18-30. Russian. doi: 10.29296/24999490-2026-02-03.

Avlas S, Shani G, Rhone N, Itan M, Dolitzky A, Hazut I, et al. Epithelial cell expressed type II IL 4 receptor mediates eosinophilic esophagitis. Allergy. 2023;78:464-76. doi: 10.1111/all.15510.

Ryu S, Lee KH, Tizaoui K, Terrazzino S, Cargnin S, Effenberger M, et al. Pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis: a comprehensive review of the genetic and molecular aspects. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7253. doi: 10.3390/ijms21197253.

Dunn JLM, Shoda T, Caldwell JM, Wen T, Aceves SS, Collins MH,et al. Esophageal type 2 cytokine expression heterogeneity in eosinophilic esophagitis in a multisite cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(6):1629-1640.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.01.051.

Ebrahimi S, Khatami S, Mahjoub FE, Monajemzadeh M, Yousefi A, Hosseini A,et al. Detection of eosinophilic cell free granules based on expression of CCR3 and MBP markers in esophageal biopsy specimens of patients with suspected and confirmed eosinophilic esophagitis. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2025;28(1):19-26. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2025.28.1.19.

Shaker A. Esophageal remodeling in eosinophilic esophagitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2024;40(4):291-8. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000001031.

Hahn JW, Lee K, Shin JI, Cho SH, Turner S, Shin JU, et al. Global incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis, 1976 2022: a systematic review and meta analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;21(13):3270-3284.e77. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.06.005.

Patel H, Elmer J, Liaquat H. Exploring the impact of gender on the characteristics and complications of eosinophilic esophagitis. JGH Open. 2024;8:e70059. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70059.

Gupta M, Grinman M. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis. CMAJ. 2024;196(4):E121-E128. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230378.

Amil-Dias J, Oliva S, Papadopoulou A, Thomson M, Gutiérrez-Junquera C, Kalach N, et al. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis in children: an update from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024;79:394-437. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12188.

McKeown K, Pritchett J, Carlisle A, Zhang J, Lieberman J, Xi D. Impact of gender, race, and age of onset on the phenotype and comorbidities of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis. JPGN Rep. 2024;5:284-8. doi: 10.1002/jpr3.12093.

Schlager H, Baumann Durchschein F, Steidl K, et al. Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis and esophageal food impaction in adults: a position paper issued by the Austrian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (ÖGGH). Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024;136(Suppl 10):479-99. doi: 10.1007/s00508-024-02401-w.

Al Abdulqader AK. Advances in diagnostic techniques for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review of emerging noninvasive methods. Eur J Med Res. 2025;30(1):924. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02989-3.

O'Shea KM, Aceves SS, Dellon ES, Gupta SK, Spergel JM, Furuta GT, et al. Pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(2):333-45. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.065.

Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Casabona-Francés S, Amorena E, Savarino EV, Pérez-Martínez I, Blas-Jhon L, et al; EUREOS and EoE CONNECT research group. Sex-related differences in the presentation, management and response to treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis: Cross sectional analysis of EoE CONNECT registry. United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Dec;12(10):1388-98. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12699.

Published
2026/06/29
Section
Original article