The Hipokratovo etičko nasljeđe
Sažetak
Tekst analizira etički sadržaj Hipokratove zakletve, ocjenjuje njen značaj za savremenu medicinu i daje odgovor na pitanja koliko je ona relevantna današnjim ljekarima. Etički sadržaj Hipokratove etike podjeljen je na tri dijela: zavjet, kodeks i etikeciju. Obrazložena je polemika u tumačenju kontroverznih dijelova o abortusu, eutanaziji i upotrebi hirurgije. Hipokrat će i u drugim svojim tekstovima potencirati na visokoj moralnosti pa od ljekara zahtjeva da se odlikuju vrlinama, budu primjeri humanosti i čuvaju čast svoje profesije. Hipokratova zakletva je i pored svojih nedostataka isticanjem odgovornosti ljekara za dobrobit pacijenta i dalje uzorna za medicinsku praksu. Potrebno je da ljekari pored tehničkog znanja budu i etički obrazovani kako bi mogli donositi savjesne moralne odluke. Zakletva je stara, neautentična, modifikovana, različito interpretirana i nepotpuna ali je i dalje relevantna za savremenu bio-medicinsku etiku.
Reference
Pinault JR. Hippocratic lives and legends: studies in ancient medicine. Vol. 4. Leiden: Brill; 1997.
Platon. Platonova djela: Ijon, Gozba, Fedar, Odbrana Sokratova Kriton. [Platonian works: Ion, Symposium, Phaedrus, Apology of Socrates, Crito]. Beograd: Dereta; 2006. p. 270b-d. Serbian.
Platon. Protagora/Sofist. [Protagoras/Sophist] Zagreb: Naprijed; 1975. p. 311b-c. Croatian.
Aristotel. Politika. [Politic] Zagreb: Globus; 1988. p. 1326a.15. Croatian.
Hippocrates. Oath. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. I. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1957. p. 299-301.
Nittis S. The Authorship and probable date of the Hippocratic Oath. Bull Hist Med 1940;8(7):1012-21.
Edelstein L. The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation and interpretation. In: Temkin O, Temkin L, editors. Ancient Medicine. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1967. p. 3-65.
Smith CM. Origin and uses of primum non nocere–above all, do no harm! J Clin Pharmacol 2005;45(4):371-7.
Inman T. Foundation for a new theory and practice of medicine. London: John Churchill; 1860. p. 244.
Hippocrates. Epidemics 1. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. I. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957. p. 149.
Rütten T. François Tissard and his 1508 edition of the Hippocratic Oath. In: Derejik PJ. Hippocrates in context: Papers read at the XIth International Hippocrates Colloquium. University of Newcastle upon Tyne 27-31 Aug 2002. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers; 2005. p. 465–491.
Orr RD. The Hippocratic Oath: is it still relevant? [Internet]. Loma Linda University Center for Christian Bioethics Update 1998;14(1) [cited 2020 Sep 4]. Available from: https:// bit.ly/2ZeoxXz.
Orr RD, Pang N, Pellegrino ED, Siegler M. Use of the Hippocratic Oath: a review of twentieth-century practice and a content analysis of oaths administered in medical schools in the U.S. and Canada in 1993. J Clin Ethics 1997;8:377-88.
Gruenbaum SE, Jotkowitz AB. Content analysis of ethical codes written by medical students compared with other codes of medical ethics. Eur J Intern Med 2009;20:101-4.
Sulmasy DP. What is an oath and why should a physician swear one? Theor Med Bioeth 1999;20:329-46.
Carrick P. Medical ethics in ancient world. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2001. p. 84.
Hippocrates. On the nature of the child. In: Potter P, editor. Hippocrates Vol. X. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2012. p. 25-95.
Hippocrates. The Art. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957; p. 203.
Veatch RM. A theory of medical ethics. New York: Basic Books; 1981.
Murphy LJT. History of urology. Springfield: C. Thomas; 1972. p. 20-22.
Nittis S. The Hippocratic Oath in reference to lithotomy: a new interpretation with historical notes on castration. Bull Hist Med 1939;7:719-28.
Edelstein L. The Hippocratic Oath: text, translation and interpretation. In: Temkin O, Temkin L, editors. Ancient medicine. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1967.
Kass L. Toward a more natural science: biology and human affairs. New York: Free Press; 1985. p. 235-6.
Papavramidou N, Voultsos P. Medical malpractice cases in Hippocratic collection: a review and today's perspective. Hippokratia 2019;23(3):99-105.
Hippocrates. Law. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957. p. 264.
Hippocrates. Physician. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957. p. 312-13.
Hippocrates. Decorum. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957. p. 279-301.
Hippocrates. Precepts. In: Page TE, editor. Hippocrates Vol. I. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1957. p. 319.
Platon. Zakoni. [Laws] Beograd: Dereta, 2004. p. IX 933. Serbian.
Radenović S. Bioetika i medicina: odnos ljekar-pacijent u paradigmi integrativne bioetike. [Bioethics and medicine: doctor-patient relationship in the paradigm of integrative bioethics]. Novi Sad: Akademska knjiga; 2012.
Loewy EH. Oaths for physicians - necessary protection or elaborate hoax? MedGenMed 2007;9(1):7.
Veatch RM, Mason CG. Hippocratic vs. judeo-christian medical ethics: principles in conflict. J Relig Ethics 1987;15(1):86-105.
Hulkwer R. The history of the Hippocratic Oath: outdated, inauthentic, and yet still relevant. Einstein J Biol Med 2010;25(1):41-44.
Mountokalakis TD, Modern medical ethics and legacy of Hippocrates. Hosp Chron 2014;9(4):229-31.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).