What a Women Desire: Application of Conjoint Analysis for Analysing the Choice of Menstrual Hygiene Products and Factors Influencing Their Consummatory Behaviour

  • Abhay Kumar Tiwari department of statistics, Banaras Hindu University
  • Vaishali Patel department of statistics, Banaras Hindu University
  • Chitra Saroj Department of statistics, Banaras Hindu University

Sažetak


Background/Aim: Middle-aged adolescent girls and women experience menstruation, a normal and physiologic occurrence. Using the myths and beliefs that were already prevalent, they created their own approach of dealing with the menstrual cycle. Aim of this study was to examine women's readiness to purchase any sanitary product by examining their preferences for the characteristics of sanitary goods used during menstruation.

Methods: The utility values and relative weights assigned to various aspects, such as comfort, efficacy, hygiene, etc, have been determined through analysis. Two hundred and ten women who lived on the campus of the Banaras Hindu University were questioned. The demographic features of the respondents, the attributes with their corresponding levels and the relationship between these qualities and the type of approach employed over time are explained using descriptive and Chi-square techniques. Conjoint analysis was employed to ascertain utility value and elicit preferences.

Result: Following investigation, findings indicate that synthetic sanitary napkins are used by women more frequently than any other menstrual hygiene products and that inaccessibility and cost are the main barriers to sanitary product use. Demographic factors and the type of sanitary product used, as well as knowledge of innovative methods of menstrual hygiene, were found to be strongly correlated. The results also show that women place the least value on hygiene and the most value on the type of sanitary product. Additionally, women prefer to choose any synthetic sanitary product that is more efficient, safe, pleasant and economical and does not require replacement in less than four hours.

Reference

Pali J, Ahmed A, Mariam T. Discourse of menstrual wellbeing in socio-cultural perspective among adolescent girls in rural Rajasthan. Int J Soc Sci Econ Res. 2019;4(2):801-18.

Garg S, Sharma N, Sahay R. Socio-cultural aspects of menstruation in an urban slum in Delhi, India. Repr Health Matters. 2001 Jan 1;9(17):16-25. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(01)90004-7

Ray S, Dasgupta A. Determinants of menstrual hygiene among adolescent girls: a multivariate analysis. Nat J Community Med. 2012 Jun 30;3(02):294-301.

Ghandour R, Hammoudeh W, Giacaman R, Holmboe-Ottesen G, Fjeld HE. Coming of age: a qualitative study of adolescent girls’ menstrual preparedness in Palestinian refugee camps in the West Bank and Jordan. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2111793. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2111793.

.Abraham S, Fraser I, Knight C, Llewellyn‐Jones D, Mira M, Gebski V, McNeil D. Menstruation, menstrual protection and menstrual cycle problems: The knowledge, attitudes and practices of young Australian women. Med J Aust. 1985 Feb 18;142(4):247-51. PMID: 3974461.

Patil R, Agarwal L, Khan MI, Gupta SK, Vedapriya DR, Raghavia M, Mittal A. Beliefs about menstruation: A study from rural Pondicherry. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties. 2011 Jan 1;2(1):23-6. doi: 10.7713/ijms.2011.0006.

Onyegegbu N. Menstruation and menstrual hygiene among women and young females in rural eastern Nigeria. J Sci Teach Assoc Nigeria. 2011.

Mahon T, Tripathy A, Singh N. Putting the men into menstruation: the role of men and boys in community menstrual hygiene management. Waterlines. 2015 Jan 1;34(1):7-14. doi: 10.3362/1756-3488.2015.002.

Piper Pillitteri S. Toilets are not enough: Addressing menstrual hygiene management in secondary schools in Malawi [dissertation]. Bedford, UK: Cranfield University, 2011.

House S, Mahon T, Cavill S. Menstrual hygiene matters: a resource for improving menstrual hygiene around the world. Reproductive Health Matters. 2013 May 1;21(41):257-9.

Kara S. A Research study about the expectations from sanitary napkins, current problems and design of a functional sanitary napkin.E rciyes Univ J Inst SciTechnol. 2021;37(1):74-90.

Mehta S, Grover A, Mittal N, Nanda P, Khatuja R, Naseem A. Reusable sanitary napkins-time to revisit. J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Jun 27;44(2):356-362. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa192.

MacRae ER, Clasen T, Dasmohapatra M, Caruso BA. 'It's like a burden on the head': Redefining adequate menstrual hygiene management throughout women's varied life stages in Odisha, India. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220114.

Gautam PK, Khadka S. Product innovation and consumer preference for feminine hygiene products: a moderated model with product deprivation. Manag Dynamics. 2022 Dec 31;25(1):51-62. doi: 10.3126/md.v25i1.53287.

Malhorta NK, Birks DF. Marketing research: An applied approach. Harlow: Prentice Hall. 2006.

Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ. 2000 Jun 3;320(7248):1530-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1530.

Kholibrina CR, Aswandi A. The consumer preferences for new styrax based perfume products using a conjoint analysis approach. InIOP Confe Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020 Sep 1;935(1):012016. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/935/1/012016.

Choudhary J, Bhattacharjee DM. A study on consumption pattern of sanitary napkin and environment degradation. Int J Creative Res Thoughts (IJCRT). 2018;5(10):11-6.

Objavljeno
2024/12/26
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak