ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL OF ELECTRIC MOBILITY FOR LOW CARBON TRANSIT TOURISM: EVIDENCE FROM THE BELGRADE-ZLATIBOR CORRIDOR

Ključne reči: English

Sažetak


Transit tourism in mountainous regions generates a considerable carbon footprint due to the dominant use of internal combustion vehicles, particularly along intensively used routes such as the Belgrade-Zlatibor corridor. Although electric mobility offers the potential to reduce transport-related emissions, its relevance for Serbia’s transit tourism has not been systematically examined. This study addresses this gap by integrating an assessment of the existing charging infrastructure, an on-site survey of travelers conducted on Zlatibor (N=500), and a comparison of electric and conventional vehicles using established life cycle assessment (LCA) data. The aim is to evaluate the extent to which electric mobility can support a transition toward lower-carbon transit tourism along this corridor. The findings show that adventure- and nature-based activities represent the primary motivation for travel, increasing the importance of sustainable transport solutions in environmentally sensitive mountain destinations. Survey results further indicate that more than half of respondents would be willing to use electric vehicles if charging infrastructure were more accessible and spatially distributed along the route. In line with international evidence, established LCA data consistently show significantly lower lifecycle CO₂ emissions for electric vehicles relative to conventional vehicles, depending on the energy mix and vehicle segment. Overall, the study highlights electric mobility as a feasible pathway for reducing transit-tourism-related emissions and strengthening destination sustainability planning.

Reference

1. AFIR (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. Official Journal of the European Union.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
3. Cadarso, M. Á., Gomez, N., López, L. A., & Tobarra, M. Á. (2016). Calculating tourism's carbon footprint: measuring the impact of investments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 529–537.
4. European Commission (2020). Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future. Brussels: COM(2020) 789 final.
5. European Commission. (2016). A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility. Brussels.
6. European Commission. (2018). A European strategy for low-emission mobility. European Commission.
7. European Environment Agency. (2018). Electric vehicles from life cycle and circular economy perspective. Copenhagen.
8. European Environment Agency. (2022). Electric vehicles from life cycle and circular economy perspectives. European Environment Agency, Report No 13/2022.
9. European Green Deal (2019). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, and the Council. COM(2019) 640 final.
10. Gibbins, J., Beaudet, A., Chalmers, H., & Lamperth, M. (2007). Electric vehicles for low-carbon transport. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Energy, 160(4), 165–173.
11. Gössling, S., Balas, M., Mayer, M., & Sun, Y. Y. (2023). A review of tourism and climate change mitigation: The scales, scopes, stakeholders and strategies of carbon management. Tourism Management, 95, 104681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104681
12. Gühnemann, A., Kurzweil, A., & Mailer, M. (2021). Tourism mobility and climate change – A review of the situation in Austria. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 34, 100382. DOI: 10.1016/j.jort.2021.100382
13. Gühnemann, A., Riedl, A., & Borrmann, D. (2021a). The role of electric mobility in sustainable transport systems: Lessons for tourism. Transportation Research Part D, 97, 102925.
14. Hall, C. M. (2019). Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 Agenda and the management of tourism’s triple bottom line. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(7), 1044–1060.
15. Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau-Bettez, G., & Hammer, D. (2013). Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(1), 53–64.
16. ICCT — Bieker, G. (2021). A global comparison of the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of combustion engine and electric passenger cars. International Council on Clean Transportation.
17. Institut za ekonomske nauke. (2022). Studija o subvencijama za kupovinu električnih i hibridnih vozila. Beograd.
18. Isetti, G., Ferraretto, V., Stawinoga, A. E., Gruber, M., & DellaValle, N. (2020). Is caring about the environment enough for sustainable mobility? An exploratory case study from South Tyrol (Italy). Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6, 100148. DOI: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100148
19. Lenzen, M., Sun, Y. Y., Faturay, F., Ting, Y. P., Geschke, A., & Malik, A. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature climate change, 8(6), 522-528. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-018-0141-x
20. Meyer-Cech, K., & Probstl, U. (2006). Sustainable tourism in mountainous regions.
21. Nature. (2024). Electric vehicles and decarbonization potential: Global synthesis. Nature Climate Change, 14(3), 321–333.
22. Scuttari, A. & Isetti, G. (2019). E-mobility and Sustainable Tourism Transport in Remote Areas: Insights from the Alpine case study of South Tyrol (IT). Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft, 11(2), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1515/tw-2019-0014
23. Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & Van Wee, B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194.
24. Sun, Y. Y., Cadarso, M. A., & Driml, S. (2020). Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input–output approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 82, 102928.
25. UNWTO. (2022). Measuring the Sustainability of Tourism (MST Framework). Madrid: United Nations World Tourism Organization.
26. Vlada Republike Srbije. (2016). Strategija razvoja turizma Republike Srbije 2016–2025. Beograd.
Objavljeno
2026/04/17
Rubrika
Originalni naučni članak