Differences in motivation of health care professionals in public and private health care centers

Lepa Babić; Boris Kordić; Jovana Babić

doi:10.5937/ejae11-6957

Lepa Babić Faculty of Business, Singidunum University
Boris Kordić Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade
Jovana Babić Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ejae11-6957

Sažetak

It is very important to achieve client satisfaction in the health care sector, which is why the issue of motivation of health care professionals is always an interesting topic to explore. Having in mind the current situation in the private health care sector in Serbia, we have decided to examine the differences in satisfaction of motivational needs in health care professionals, with an emphasis on differences between health care professionals working in public and private health care centres. We have used Maslow and Herzberg’s motivation theories when designing the appropriate questionnaire. The results obtained have revealed differences between subsamples. Health care professionals working in the private sector are more satisfied with their salaries, working conditions, job certainty and opportunities for professional development.

Biografije autora

Lepa Babić, Faculty of Business, Singidunum University

Associate Professor

Boris Kordić, Faculty of Security Studies, University of Belgrade

Associate Professor

Jovana Babić, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Psychology, University of Belgrade

MA student

Reference

Benson, S.G., & Dundis, S.P. (2003). Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, training and technology. Journal of Nursing Management, 11(5), 315-320.

Čizmić, S.M., & Milanović, S.S. (2004). Work motivation of employees exposed to ionizing radiation. Bilten Instituta za nuklearne nauke Vinča, 9(1-4), 23-31.

Dalton, S. (2010). Motivating medicine: Why money is not enough. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 46(4), 142-143.

Dubois, C., & Singh, D. (2009). From staff-mix to skill-mix and beyond: towards a systemic approach to health workforce management. Human Resources for Health, 7(87), 1-19. DOI:10.1186/1478-4491-7-87.

Duncan, M.K.W., & Blugis, A. (2011). Maslow’s Needs Hierarchy as a Framework for Evaluating Hospitality Houses’ Resources and Services. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 26(4), 325-331. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.04.003.

Dussault, G., & Dubois, C. (2003). Human resources for health policies: A critical component in health policies. Human resources for health, 1(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-1.

Edwards, N., Nomacki, M., & Silversin, J. (2002). Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done. British Medical Journal, 324, 835–838. DOI:10.1136/bmj.324.7341.835.

Herbst, L.H. (2006). Applying the concepts from Maslow in a large U.S. hospice program. Journal of Palliative Care, 9(5), 1049-1050. DOI:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.104.

Herzberg, F. (1964). The Motivation-Hygiene Concept and Problems of Manpower. Personnel Administrator, 27(1), 3-7.

Herzberg, F. (1971). Work and the nature of man. New York: World Publishing.

Hung, L.M., Shi, L., Wang, H., Nie, X., & Mengm Q. (2013). Chinese primary care providers and motivating factors on performance. Family Practice, 30(5), 576-586.

Lundberg, C., Gudmundson, A., & Andersson, T. D. (2009). Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory of work motivation tested empirically on seasonal workers in hospitality and tourism. Tourism Management, 30(6), 890-899.

Manongi, R.N., Marchant, T.C., & Bygbjerg, I.C. (2006). Improving motivation among primary health care workers in Tanzania: a health worker perspective. Human resources for health, 4(6). DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-4-6.

Martínez, D.H., Vásquez Navarrete, M.L., & Vagras Lorenzo, I. (2009). Factors influencing coordination among healthcare levels according to the opinion of healthcare managers and health professionals. Gaceta sanitaria, 23(4), 280-286. DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.05.001.

Maslow, A.H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

Matzle, K., & Renzl, B. (2007). Assessing asymmetric effects in the formation of employee satisfaction. Tourism Management, 28(4), 1093-1103. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.009.

Robbins, S.P., & Coulter, M.K. (2007). Management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sanyal, M.K., & Biswas, S.B. (2014). Employee motivation from performance appraisal implications: Test of a theory in the software industry in West Bengal (India). Procedia Economics and Finance, 11, 182-196. DOI: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00187-7.

Skela Savič, B., & Pagon, M. (2008). Individual involvement in health care organizations: differences between professional groups, leaders and employees. Stress Health, 24, 71-84. DOI: 10.1002/smi.1164.

Skela Savič, B., & Robida, A. (2013). Capacity of middle management in health-care organizations for working with people – the case of Slovenian hospitals. Human Resources for Health, 11(18). DOI: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-18.

Smerek, R.E., & Peterson, M. (2007). Examining Herzberg’s theory: Improving job satisfaction among non-academic employees at a University. Research in Higher Education, 48(2), 229-250. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-006-9042-3.

Stilwell, B., Diallo, K., Zurn, P., Vujičić, M., Adams, O., & Dal Poz, M. (2004). Migration of health-care workers from developing countries: Strategic approaches to its management. Bulletin of the World Health Orgaization, 82, 595-600.

Ţicu, D. (2013). Theories of motivation in public policies process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 925-929. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.778.

Toode, K., Routasalo, P., & Suominen, T. (2011). Work motivation of nurses: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(3), 246-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.09.013.

Zalenski, R. J., & Raspa, R. (2006). Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: A framework for achieving human potential in hospice. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 9(5), 1120-1127.

Zámečník, R. (2014). The measurement of employee motivation by using multi-factor statistical analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 851-857. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.553.