Control on teams: a model and empirical evidence from Bulgaria

  • Maya Rumenova Lambovska University of National and World Economy
Keywords: team, control, fuzzy logics, performance evaluation, modelling, Bulgaria,


This paper suggests an original model for control on teams. The originality of the model is associated with a combination of management concepts and mathematical theories of fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets. In addition to the team control model, the author proposes a toolkit for measurement and evaluation of team performance. The toolkit incorporates fuzzy techniques and tools for quantification of evaluations, decision-making, study of joint influences and hidden effects. The results from testing the team control model at a Bulgarian University are also presented and discussed in this paper.

Author Biography

Maya Rumenova Lambovska, University of National and World Economy

Prof., DSc. Maya Lambovska

Department of Management

1700 Sofia


Aubert, N. etc. (1991). Management. Paris: PUF.

Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., & Bojanić, D. (2015). Modification of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method using fuzzy logic: Fuzzy AHP approach as a support to the decision making process concerning engagement of the group for additional hindering. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(2), 151-171.

Bojadziev, G., & Bojadziev, M. (1997). Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management. Singapore: World Scientific publishing.

Burns, L., Bradley, E., & Weiner, B. (2012). Shortell and Kaluzny’s health care management: Organization design & behaviour. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage learning.

Caldwell, Ch. (2000). Performance management. USA: American Management Association.

Guinn, K. (1987). Performance management: not just an annual appraisal. Personnel, August, 39-42.

INTOSAI. (2004). Guidelines for performance audit Sofia: Bulgarian Audit Office , . (in Bulgarian).

Ilgen, D., & Schneider, J. (1991). Performance measurement: a multidiscipline view. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 71-108.

Kaufmann, A., & Gil-Aluja, J. (1990). Laz matematicas del azar y de la incertidumbre. Madrid: Ediciones Graficas Ortega.

Kolev, P., Todorova, D., & Gergova, N. (2012). Electronic forms of training – opportunities and prospects for Todor Kableshkov University of Transport. Pp. 343-369 in Proceedings of ISC “Management 2012”, Belgrade: University of Belgrade.

Kozlowski, S., & Bell, B. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations. Pp. 412-469 in N. Schmitt & S. Highhouse (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 12, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Margerison, Ch., & McCann, D. (1990). Team Management: Practical New Approaches. London: Mercury Books.

McIntyre, R., & Tedrow, L. (2004). A theory-based approach to team performance assessment. Pp. 443-451 in J. Thomas (Ed.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment: Industrial and organizational assessment, Vol. 4, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Mintzberg, H. (2013). Organizational configurations .

Parker, G. (2011). Teams players and teamwork: New strategies for developing successful collaboration. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.

Salas, E., Stagl, K., & Burke, C. (2004). 25 years of team effectiveness in organization: Research themes and emerging needs. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 47-92.

Slavić, A., Berber, N., & Leković, B. (2014). Performance management in international human resource management: Evidence from the CEE region. Serbian Journal of Management, 9(1), 45-58.

Simeonov, O. (2010). Conceptual aspects of the contemporary development of management control, Sofia: VUZF. (in Bulgarian).

Živković, Ž., Nikolić, D., Mihajlović, I., & Djordjević P. (2016). Dependability assessment of supplier performance based on fuzzy sets theory. Pp. 43-56 in Pál Michelberger (Ed.), Management, Enterprise and Benchmarking in the 21st century, Budapest: Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.

Original Scientific Paper