Knowledge management in the public sector – the case of Serbian local government
Abstract
Knowledge has become an increasingly important determinant of competitiveness for the local governments. The purpose of this paper was to explore the existence of KM in Serbian local government and to identify and analyzes processes and infrastructure that supports KM practices. The paper consists of two parts; the first part covers comprehensive literature review that summarizes the existing research done on the subject of knowledge management in public sector in order to put research in context and to highlight the contribution of this paper to the existing body of knowledge. The second part consists of empirical research conducted to get a preview of the current state of the KM practice in Serbian local government. There were several important findings regarding KM practices in Serbian LGs identified in the study, i.e., public servants have a positive attitude toward KM concept; KM activities are mostly technology supported; KM is perceived as a management priority; there is not any formal attribution of responsibility for knowledge practice to executive staff, human resource unit or IT unit, neither any mention of knowledge capacity development in strategies or plans of LGs. Finally, the results of this research study provide valuable guidance for future research for both academics and practitioners.
References
Adeoti, J.O. (2002). Building technological capability in the less developed countries: the role of a national system of innovation. Science and Public Policy, 29 (2), 95-104.
Akdere, M. (2009). The Role of Knowledge Management in Quality Management Practices: Achieving Performance Excellence in Organizations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11 (3), 349-361.
Äljälä, K. (2001). Public Sector – an employer of choice? Report on the competitive public employer project. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ansari, M., Youshanlouei, H.R., & Mood, M.M. (2012). A Conceptual Model for Success in Implementing Knowledge Management: A Case Study in Tehran Municipality. Journal of Service Science and Management, 5(2), 212-222.
Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2002). Moving from excellence models of local service delivery to benchmarking ‘good local governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68, 9-24.
Bovaird, T., Davis, P., & Green, J. (1996). More for Less: Managing Within Limited Resources. London: Local Government Management Board.
Chelliah, P.P., Thurasamy, R., Alzahrani, A.I., Alfarraj, O., & Alalwan, N. (2016). E-Government service delivery by a local government agency: The case of E-Licensing. Telematics and Informatics, 33, 925-935.
Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementary theory-based approach. The International Journal of Management Science, 36 (1), 234-251.
Chong, S.C., & Choi, Y.S. (2005). Critical Factors in the Successful Implementation of Knowledge Management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 6(6).
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they Know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dawes, S., Cresswell, A., & Prado, T. (2009). From "Need to Know" to "Need to Share": Tangled Problems, Information Boundaries, and the Building of Public Sector Knowledge Networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392-402.
Dewah, P., & Mutula, S.M. (2014). Knowledge retention strategies in public sector organizations: Current status in sub-Saharan Africa. Information Development, 32(3), 362-376.
Douglas, J. (2010). The Identification, Development and Application of Information Culture in the Western Australian Public Sector. Faculty of Computing, Health, and Science; Edith Cowan University.
Drucker, P. (1954). Practice of Management. London: William Heinemann Ltd.
Drucker, P. (1993). The Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Edge, K. (2005). Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example. Journal of knowledge management, 9 (6), 42-52.
Galariotis, E., Guyot, A., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2016). A novel multi-attribute benchmarking approach for assessing the financial performance of local governments: Empirical evidence from France. European Journal of Operational Research, 248 (1), 301–317.
Gholami, M.H., Asli, M.N., NazariShirkouhi, S., & Noruzy, A. (2013). Investigating the Influence of Knowledge Management Practices on Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 10(2), 205-216.
Gold, A., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18 (1), 185-214.
Hartley, J., & Skelcher, C. (2008). The agenda for public service improvement. In J. Hartley, C. Skelcher, C. Donaldson, and M. Wallance, Managing to Improve Public Service (pp. 3-23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ho, C.T. (2009). The relationship between knowledge management enablers and performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 109 (1), 98–117.
King, A., & Zeithaml, C.P. (2003). Measuring organizational knowledge: a conceptual and methodological framework. Strategic Management Journal, 44 (1), 409-424.
Maresova, P., & Kacetla, J. (2015). Cloud Computing in the Public Sector – Case Study in Educational Institution. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (182), 341- 348.
Marques, D. P., & Simon, F. J. (2006). The effect of knowledge management practices on firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(3), 143-156.
Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Garlatti, A. (2015). Public sector knowledge management: a structured literature review. Journal of knowledge management, 19 (3), 530-558.
McAdams, R., & Reid, R. (2000). A comparison of public and private sector perceptions and use of knowledge management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24 (6), 317-329.
Mihic, M., & Obradovic, V. (2012). Strategic turnaround of financial management in the Serbian government. Serbian Project Management Journal , 2 (2), 37-46.
Mihic, M., & Obradovic, V. (2013). The role of strategic financial management in public administration in increasing the competitiveness of Serbian economy. Exploring modern trends of strategic management of the application of specialized management disciplines in the function of the competitiveness of Serbian economy, 27-43.
Murray, P. (2002). Knowledge management as a sustained competitive advantage. Ivey Business Journal, 66 (4), 71–76.
Nicolas, R. (2004). Knowledge management impacts on the decision-making process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 20-31.
Noh, M., Kim, H., & Jang, H. (2014). Learning performance and business performance of knowledge management organizations: The moderating effect of technological capability. Information development, 30(5), 1-18.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, 5(1), 14-37.
Pee, L., & Kankanhalli, A. (2015). Interactions among factors influencing knowledge management in public organisations: A resource-based view. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 188-199.
Pratt, R. (2013). Balancing accountability and responsiveness: Building responsible flexibility in local government. In K. and. Sampson (Ed.), Public management in the blue economy. Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University, 89-102.
Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational learning and knowledge in public services organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (4), 463-494.
Riege, A., & Lindsay, N. (2006). Knowledge management in the public sector: stakeholder partnerships in the public policy development. Journal of knowledge management, 10 (3), 24-39.
Saussois, J.-M. (2003). Knowledge Management in Government: An Idea Whose Time Has Come. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 3(3), 105-136.
Seba, I., & Rowley, J. (2010). Knowledge management in the UK police forces. Journal of knowledge management, 14 (4), 611-626.
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., and Weerakkody, V. (2015). Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 473–487.
Sotirakou, T., & Zeppou, M. (2004). The "MATE" model: a strategic knowledge management technique on the chessboard of public-sector modernisation. Management Decision, 42 (1), 69-88.
Svaärd, P. (2014). Information culture in three municipalities and its impact on information management amidst e-government development. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions , 40 (1), 48–59.
Titi Amayah, A. (2013). Determinants of knowledge sharing in public sector organizations. Journal of knowledge management, 17(3), 454-471.
Todorovic, M., Petrovic, M., Mihic, M., Obradovic, V., & Bushuyev, S. (2015). Project success analysis framework: A knowledge-based approach in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 33 (4), 772–783.
Van Beveren, J. (2003). Does health care for knowledge management? Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (5), 420-433.
Wiig, K.M. (2002). Knowledge management in public administration. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (3), 224-239.
Wu, I.-L., & Hu, Y.-P. (2012). Examining Knowledge Management Enabled Performance for Hospital Professionals: A Dynamic Capability View and the Mediating Role of Process Capability. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(12), 976-999.
Yao, L., Kam, T., & Chan, S. (2007). Knowledge sharing in Asian public administration sector: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20 (1), 51-69.
Yuen, Y.H. (2007). Overview of knowledge management in the public sector. 7th Global Forum on Reinventing Government: Building Trust in Government. Vienna: United Nations.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.