Potential impact of the science - technology park on the regional development
The impact of the Science and Technology Park (STP) on the development of one region can be considered through many reasons for establishment of STPs. STP represent useful instrument which creates conditions for promoting innovations, entrepreneurship, growth of knowledge-based companies, while the output results are reflected in economic growth of the region. Due to declining demographic trends in region of eastern Serbia, especially considering young population and phenomenon of “brain drain”, the goal of STP is to provide conditions for intellectual companionship at the highest level, to create chances to exchange knowledge and ideas, to improve potential of the community and to increase knowledge and achieve suitable bilateral cooperation with similar entities in the world. This paper provides review of possible benefits of establishing STP in city of Bor, based on scientific-research potential of Eastern Serbia region.
Brčić, R., & Brodar, K. (2008). Role of Science and Technology Parks in Enterpreneurship Development. The case of Varaždin County. International Scientific Publications: Journal Economy and Business, 1(2), 363-375.
Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2017). The effect of science and technology parks on firms' performance: How can firms benefit most under economic downturns?. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(10), 1153-1166.
Dyson, R.G. (2004). Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(3), 631-640.
Felsenstainer, D. (1994). University - related science parks "seedbeds" or "enclaves"of innovations. Technovation, 14(2), 93-110.
Ghazinoory, S., Esmail Zadeh, A., & Memariani, A. (2007). Fuzzy SWOT analysis. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 18(1), 99-108.
Gursel, A. (2014). Science and Technology Parks and University Collaborations. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 2(2), 35-40.
Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard, J. (2005). Second generation science parks from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25, 1039-1049.
Janković, R., Dobrosavljević, A., Đorđević, M., Cvetković, V., & Kovačević, J. (2017). Science and Technology Park in Bor. Proceedings of International May Conference on Strategic Management – IMKSM, 745-753.
Kang, B. (2016). Governance Structures to Facilitate Collaboration of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Science & Technology Parks. World Technopolis Association, 5(2), 108-118.
Nauwelaers, C., Kleibrink, A., & Stancova, K. (2014). The role of science parks in smart specialisation strategies. S3 Policy Brief Series No.08/2014, European Union.
Ravanavar, G.M., & Charantimath, P.M. (2012). Strategic formulation using tows matrix–A Case Study. International Journal of Research and Development, 1(1), 87-90.
Sobkowicz, P. (2013). The role of science and technology parks in communication processes between research institutions and industry. Marketing of Scientific and Research Organisations, 10(4), 2-18.
Stanković, I., Gocić, M., & Trajković, S. (2009). Forming of Science and Technology Park as an aspect of Civil Engeenering. Facta universitatis, Architecture and Civil Engineering, 7(1), 57-64.
van Geenhuizen, M. (2016), Science parks’ diversity and broadened roles: New concepts and grounds for evaluation. In Proceedings of XIV Triple Helix International Conference 2016. Triple Helix Association.
Vilà, P.C., & Pagès, J.L. (2008). Science and technology parks: creating new environments favourable to innovation. Paradigmes: Economia productiva i coneixement, 141–149.
Wasim, M.U. (2014). Factors of Science Park Planning. World Technopolis Association, 3, 97-108.
Weihrich, H. (1982). The TOWS matrix-A tool for situational analysis. Long range planning, 15(2), 54-66.
Wyns, T., & Khatchadourian, A. (2016). Situational analysis of EU renewable energy legislation. Climate Policy, 16(5), 568-585.
Zeng, S., Xie, X., & Chiming, T. (2010). Evaluating innovation capabilities for science parks: A system model.Technological and economic development of economy, Baltic Journal on Sustainability, 16(3), 397-413.
Živković, Ž., & Nikolić, Đ. (2016) The Basics of the Strategic Management School of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Thechnical Faculty in Bor, Bor, (in Serbian).
Penev, G., & Marinković, I. (2012). First 2011 census results, Large Population Reduction, Demographic Review, Year XII, Number 43/2012, Belgrade. Retrieved from https://www.minrzs.gov.rs/files/doc/porodica/Demografski%20pregled/2012/43%20Prvi%20rezultati%20popisa%202011-Veliko%20smanjenje%20stanovnistva.pdf 2017 Oct 4.
Science and technology park governance, Concept and deffinition. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/university-industry-partnerships/science-and-technology-park-governance/concept-and-definition/ 2017 Oct 4.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.