The role of industrial factors on optimal capital structure proxy: an empirical study on Indonesia manufacture companies

  • Prima Naomi Universitas Paramadina
  • Irwan Adi Ekaputra FEB Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, 16424, Depok
  • Buddi Wibowo FEB Universitas Indonesia, Kampus UI Depok, 16424, Depok

Abstract


The objective of this study is to improve the model of optimal capital structure. This research aims to investigate the role of the industrial factors on the optimal capital structure proxy by including industry factors in the existing model and using the company characteristic variables as control variables. This research applies seven industrial variables: 1) Number of Firms in Industry (NFI), 2) Industry Competitive Dynamic (ICD), 3) Firm Response to Industry Competitive (FRI), 4) Numbers of Employees in an Industry (NEI), 5) Employees’ Share of Firm Quasi Rents (ESQ), 6) Category of Product Diversificatio (CPD), and 7) Diversification level of Relatedness (DRD). This research determines whether the proposed proxy in this research is better than the two other proxies. The testing procedure is designed to replicate the procedure of Farhat (2003). The data used in the study consist of 83 companies from 13 industries listed on IDX for the period of 2001-2014. The results showed that the industry variables can improve the existing optimal capital structure proxies. This finding contributes to the industry in that it can improve the dynamic trade-off model of capital structure.

Author Biography

Prima Naomi, Universitas Paramadina

Lecturer of Magister Management

at Universitas Paramadina

References

Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Byoun, S., & Rhim, J. (2005). Testing of the pecking order theory and tradeoff theory of optimal capital structure. The Global Business and Finance Review, 10, 1-26.

Collins, J., & Ruefli, T. (1992). Strategic Risk: An Ordinal Approach. Management Science, 38, 1707-1731.

Cook, D.O., & Tang, T. (2010). Macroeconomic conditions and capital structure adjustment speed. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16 (1), 73-87.

D'Mello, R., & Farhat, J. (2008). A comparative analysis of proxies for an optimal leverage ratio. Review of Financial Economics, 17, 213-227.

Fama, F.E., & French, R.K. (2002). Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividents and Debt. The Review of Financial Studies, 15 (1), 1-33.

Farhat, J. B. (2003). Essays on the Dynamics of Capital Structure. A Dissertation, University of New Orleans.

Flannery, J. M., & Rangan, P. K. (2006). Partial Adjustment Toward Target Capital Structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79, 469-506.

Graham, J., & Harvey, C. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 187-243.

Hovakimian, A., & Li, G. (2011). In search of conclusive evidence: How to test for adjustment to target capital stucture. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 33-44.

Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., & Titman, S. (2001). The debt-equity choice: An analysis of issuing firms. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36, 1-24.

Hull, R.M. (1999). Leverage Ratios, Industry Norms, and Stock Price Reaction: An Empirical Investigation of Stock-for-Debt Transactions. Financial Management, 32-45.

Irawan, J.F.P. (2013). Interdependence of Company Capital Structure with Peer Capital Structure Through Herding Behavior on Manufacturing Companies in BEI. Jakarta: University of Indonesia.( in Indonesian)

Jacquemin, A., & Berry, C. (1979). Entropy Measure of Diversification and Corporate Growth. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27, 359-369.

Jalilvand, A., & Haris, R. (1984). Corporate behavior and adjusting to capital structure : The case of dual debt and equity issues. Journal of Finance, 39, 127–144.

Kayo, E. K., & Kimura, H. (2011). Hierarchical determinats of capital structure. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35 (2), 358-371.

Kochhar, R., & Hitt, M. (1998). Linking Corporate Strategy to Capital Structure : Diversification Strategy, Type and Source of Financing. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (6), 601-610.

Korajczyk, R., & Levy, A. (2003). Capital structure choice : macroeconomic conditions and financial constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 68 (1), 75-109.

Leary, M., & Roberts, M. (2005). Do Firm rebalance their capital structure? Journal of Finance, 60 (6), 2575-2619.

Leary, M., & Roberts, M. (2009). Do Firm's Financing Decisions Affect One Another. Prelimanary and Incomplate.

Lemmon, M., Roberts, M., & Zender, J. (2008). Back to the Beginning: Persistence and the Cross-Section of Corporate Capital Strucure. The Journal of Finance, 63 (4), 1575-1608.

Pandey, I. (2004). Capital Structure, Profitability and Market Structure: Evidence from Malaysia. Asia Pasific Journal of Economics & Business, 8 (2), 78-91.

Parsons, C., & Titman, S. (2009). Empirical Corporate Finance. Dalam Handbook of Corporate Finance (hal. 204-233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Sarig, H.O. (1998). The effect of Leverage on bargaining with a corporation. The Financial Review, 33, 1-16.

Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S. (1999). Testing static trade-off against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51 (2), 219–244.

Synder, C. (1996). Negotiation and Renegotiation of Optimal Financial Contracts Under the Threat of Predation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 325-343.

Published
2018/04/18
Section
Original Scientific Paper