Investigating factor interactions in formalising the process of developing new products

  • Bozhana Yavorova Stoycheva "Angel Kanchev" University of Ruse, Bulgaria
  • Diana Antonova Antonova "Angel Kanchev" University of Ruse, Bulgaria
Keywords: factor analysis, formalisation of NPD, new products development (NPD), innovation process,

Abstract


The creation of new product development programmes in industrial organisations, as a process involves a system of activities for defining, planning and implementing projects, with a view to successful market realisation. The success of a programme and its associated projects is not unambiguous (depends to some extent on the participants' point of view) and can be related to the achievement of predetermined goals and constraints, customer satisfaction, organisational knowledge, etc. For the respective industrial company, the planning process is more important than the plan itself, because hypotheses are checked; comparable alternatives are analysed; the future consequences of one or another of today's decisions are investigated; the necessary changes to the prerequisites are made.The survey was conducted in 560 medium and large enterprises operating in the manufacturing industry of Bulgaria. The aim is to establish independent factor variables and their value impacts on the effective management of the process of developing new products related to the dependent variable "formalisation or use of officially documented procedures describing the new product development (NPD) process".In order to meet the target, a quantitative study was carried out by applying a correlation and regression analysis to search for relationships and dependences between the variables examined. A regression model is presented for the dependent variable studied. The results and recommendations obtained can be used to improve the management of the product innovation process.

Author Biographies

Bozhana Yavorova Stoycheva, "Angel Kanchev" University of Ruse, Bulgaria
Faculty of Business and Management
Diana Antonova Antonova, "Angel Kanchev" University of Ruse, Bulgaria
Faculty of Business and Management

References

Al-Shalabi, A., Omar, M., & Rundquist, J. (2008). Processes and strategies of NPD: a survey of Malaysian industry. International Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 10 (1), 91-95.

Al-Shalabi, A., & Rundquist, J. (2010). Outsourcing organizing NPD at emerging markets: a survey of Malaysian firms. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 2 (3), 213-234.

Albers, A., Gladysz, B., Heitger, N., & Wilmsen, M. (2016). Categories of product innovations - a prospective categorization framework for innovation projects in early development phases based on empirical data. Procedia CIRP, 50, 135-140.

Akgϋn, A., Dayan, M., & Benedetto, A. (2008). New product development team intelligence: antecedents and consequences. Information & Management, 45, 221-226.

Artto, K., & Kulvik, I. (2011). The integrative role of project management office in the front end of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 408-421.

Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. (2009). Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 3-23.

Belliveau, P., Griffin, A., & Somermeyer, St. (2002). The PDMA toolbook for new product development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Chang, H., Tsai, M., & Tsai, C. (2011). Complex organisational knowledge structures for new product development teams. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 652-661.

Dickel D., & Moura, G. (2016). Organisational performance evaluation in intangible criteria: a model based on knowledge management and innovation management. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13 (3), 211-220.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., & Evans, S. (2017). The Cambridge business model innovation process. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 262-269.

Griffin, A. (1997). PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14, 429-458.

Hong, P., & Roh, J. (2009). Internationalization, product development and performance outcomes. A comparative study of 10 countries. Research in International Business and Finance, 23, 169-180.

Kazmi, S., Naaranoja, M., Kytola, J., & Kantola, J. (2016). Connecting strategic thinking with product innovativeness to reinforce NPD support process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, 672-684.

Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2009). Structural factors of NPD (new product development) team for manufacturability. International Journal of Project Management, 27, 690-702.

Kohl, H., Orth, R., Riebartsch, O., & Hecklau, F. (2016). Integrated evaluation system for the strategic management of innovation initiatives in manufacturing industries. Procedia CIRP, 40, 335-340.

Kulatunga, A., Karunatilake, N., Weerasinghe, N., & Ihalawatta, R. (2015). Sustainable manufacturing based decision support model for product design and development process. Procedia CIRP, 26, 87-92.

Oliviera, M., & Rozenfeld, H. (2010). Integrating technology roadmapping and portfolio management at the front-end of new product development. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 77, 1339-1354.

Pallant, J. (2005). “SPSS Survival Manual”. A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Crows Nest, NSW, Australia : Allen & Unwin.

Rametsteiner, E., & Weiss, G. (2006). Innovation and innovation policy in forestry: linking innovation process with systems models. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 691-703.

Riel, A., Neumann, M., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2013). Structuring the early fuzzy front-end to manage ideation for new product development. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 62, 107-110.

Published
2018/04/25
Section
Original Scientific Paper