Affecting determinants of trust in business relationships
Scholars claim that cooperation conflict and even competition can exist between the partners in business relationship. Why are there conflicts among business partners? The logical answer is permanent changes in the fields of politics, economics, regulations, social norms and technological systems. It can also happen that in a new business network a company has to cooperate with its former competitor. In a dynamic prospective, trust affects satisfaction. Satisfaction and conflicts are always perceived by business relationship partners. Different cultures evaluate a business relationship in different ways, therefore they have various views on how to start or develop business relationships. The aim of this paper is to investigate the complex effects of trust on perceived satisfaction, perceived conflict and among organizations in existing business relationships. In this research it was found that trust is affected by both satisfaction (positively) and conflict (negatively). Due to the lack of a widely accepted definition of trust in business and what determines it, this quantitative research may bring new thoughts to researchers or even support earlier models as well. In this empirical paper, quantitative research methods were applied and 315 valid questionnaires received from organizations registered in Hungary, independent of size and economic sector. The valid questionnaires were analysed by SPSS software using factor analysis and regressions.
Anderson, J.C., & Narus, J.A. (1990). A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 42-58.
Bahlmann, J., Schulze, B., & Spiller, A. (2007). Trust as a supply chain management tool for slaughter houses: Empirical evidence from north-western Germany. Proceedings of the 17th Annual World Forum and Symposium “Agribusiness Food Culture: Tradition, Innovation and Trust – A Positive Force for Modern Agribusiness”, IAMA Conference, June 23 - 24, 2007 Parma, Italy.
Baron, S., Conway, T., & Warnaby, G. (2010). Relationship Marketing, SAGE Publications Ltd.
Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life (13th ed., 2009), Transaction Publishers, NJ.
Cambra-Fierro, J.J., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2011). Post-satisfaction factors affecting the long-term orientation of supply relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26(6), 395–406.
Castaldo, S., Premazzi, K., & Zerbini, F. (2010). The Meaning(s) of Trust. A Content Analysis on the Diverse Conceptualizations of Trust in Scholarly Research on Business Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 96( 4), 657–668.
Celuch, K., Bantham, J., & Kasouf, C. (2011). The role of trust in buyer-seller conflict management. Journal of Business Research, 64(10), 1082-1088.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65 (2), 81-93.
Chiou, J-S., Droge, C., & Hanvanich, S. (2002). Does Customer Knowledge Affect How Loyalty Is Formed? Journal of Service Research, 5(2), 113-12.
Chu S. Y., & Fang W. C. (2006). Exploring the Relationships of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Management. Journal of American Academy of Business, 9(1), 224 – 228.
Das, T.K., & Teng, B.-S. (2004). The Risk Based View of Trust: a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19 (1), 85-119.
Doney, P.M., & Cannon, J.P. (1997). An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61, 35-51.
Emerson, R.M. (1976). Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.
Ganesan S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationship. Journal of Marketing, 58(2), 1-19.
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J., & N. Kumar (1999). A meta-analysis of satisfaction in marketing channel relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 223-238.
Gwinner, K., Gremier, D., & Bitner, M.J. (1998). Relational Benefits in Service Industries: The Customer’s Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26 (2), 101-14.
Granovetter, M. (2008). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In Readings in Economic Sociology, N. W. Biggart (Ed.)., 5th Chapter, Wiley.
Hagberg-Andersson, A., & Tidström, A. (2008). Conflict management in inter competitor cooperation. Proceedings of the 24th IMP Conference, Uppsala, Sweden.
Hausman, A. (2001). Variations in Relationship Strength and Its Impact on Performance and Satisfaction in Business Relationships. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 1 (6/7), 600-616.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., & Gremler, D.D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes: an integration of relational beneﬁts and relationship quality. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230−247.
Hocker, J. & Wilmot, W. (1985). Interpersonal Conflict (2nd ed). Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.
Homans, G.C. (1961). Social Behaviours: Its Elementary Forms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.
Hunger, J., & Stern, L. (1976). An assessment of the functionality of the superordinate goal in reducing conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 19(4), 591-605.
Karpik, L. (2014). Trust: Reality or illusion? A critical examination of Williamson. Journal of Trust Research, 4(1), 22-33.
Kemp, R., & Ghauri, P.N. (1999). Cooperation and conflict in international joint venture relationship. Proceedings of the 15th Annual IMP Conference, Dublin.
Kumar, N., Sheer, L.K., & Steenkamp, J.E.M. (1995). The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes, Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 348-356.
Kumar, N. (1996). The Power of Trust in Manufacturer-Retailer Relationships. Harvard Business Review, 74 (6), 92-106.
Kwon, I.G., & Suh, T. (2004). Factors Affecting the Level of Trust and Commitment in Supply Chain Relationships. The Journal of Supply Chain Management: A Global Review of Purchasing and Supply, Spring, 4-20.
Lambert, D.M., & Pohlen, T.L. (2001). Supply Chain Metrics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 12(1), 1–19.
Malhotra, N. K. (2007). Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation. 5th Edition, Pearson Education.
Morgan, R.M., & Hunt S.D. (1994). The Commitment - Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20 – 38.
Piricz, N. (2013). The Determinants of Trust in Business Relationships. Doctoral dissertation, www.impgroup.org/uploads/dissertations/dissertion_70.pdf
Pondy, L. (1967). Organizational Conflict: Concepts and Models, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 12, pp. 296-320.
Ratnasingam, P. (2005). E-Commerce relationships: The impact of trust on relationship continuity. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 15 (1), 1 – 16.
Reid, D.A., Pullins, E.B., Plank, R.E., & Buehrer, R.E. (2004). Measuring buyers’ perceptions of conflict in business-to-business sales interactions. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 19(4), 236-249.
Rosen, D.E., & Suprenant, C. (1998). Evaluating Relationships: Are Satisfaction and Quality Enough? International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(2), 103–125.
Rousseau, D.M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. The Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393-404.
Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie, repr as The Sociology of Georg Simmel, K.H. Wolff (ed.). New York: Free Press, 1950, (original in German).
Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000). Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Relational Exchanges. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 150-167.
Storbacka, K., Strandvik, T., & Grönroos, C. (1994). Managing Customer Relationships for Profit: The Dynamics of Relationship Quality, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5) 21–38.
Tatum, B.C., & Eberlin, R.J. (2006). Organizational justice and conflict management styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17 (1), 66-81.
Thibaut, N., & Kelley, H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Tjosvold, D., Peiguan Wu, Yifeng, Nancy Chen (2010). The effects of collectivistic and individualistic values on conflict and decision-making: an experiment in China. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2904-2926.
Waluszewski, A., & Håkansson, H. (2006). The importance of angry actors, Proceedings of the 22nd Annual IMP Conference, Milan, Italy.
Walter, A., Müller, T.A., Helfert, G., & Ritter, T. (2003). Functions of industrial supplier relationships and their impact on relationship quality. Industrial Marketing Management 32, 159 – 169.
Yaqub, M.Z., Malik, A., & Shah, H. (2010). The Roles of Satisfaction, Trust and Commitment in Value-Creation in Strategic Networks. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 18, 133-145.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.