Mathematical model and method of complex organizational diagnostic

  • Pavel Aleksandrovich Mikhnenko Moscow University for Industry and Finance “Synergy”
Keywords: organizational diagnostic, coordination mechanisms, organizational culture, coordination-cultural profile, conjunctional matrix

Abstract


The paper is devoted to the complex diagnostic of structural and cultural properties of organizations. The study reveals the new diagnostic tool – the conjunctive matrix of the coordination-cultural profile of the organization. The concept of coordination mechanisms by Mintzberg was used for diagnostics of structural-managerial characteristics of organizations. To describe the organizational culture was used the model by Cameron and Quinn (“The Competing Values Framework”). For evaluation of explicitness of the coordination profile and the profile of organizational culture were used the coefficients of homogeneity. Depending on the ratio between the coefficients of homogeneity of the coordination profile and the cultural profile were substantiated four basic types of coordination-cultural profile: “Accurate Tuning”, “Coordination Groundwork”, “Culture Groundwork” and “Searching for a Basis”. The study of twenty-two companies reveals that coordination-cultural profile “Accurate Tuning” provides the maximum economic efficiently of organizations.

Author Biography

Pavel Aleksandrovich Mikhnenko, Moscow University for Industry and Finance “Synergy”

Doctor of Economics Science, Associate Professor

References

Allaire Y., Firsirotu M. (1984). Theories of Organizational Culture. Organization Studies, 5, 193-226.

Barnard C. I. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Boston, Harvard University Press, 384 p.

Barney J. B. (1986). Organizational Culture: Can it be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage? Academy of Management Review, 11, 656-665.

Cameron K. S., Quinn R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. Based on The Competing Values Framework. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc. 242 p.

Cooke R. A., Lafferty J. C. (1988). Organizational Culture Inventory. Group & Organization Management, 13(3), September, 245-273.

Deal T. E., Kennedy A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

Denison D. R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness, New York: Wiley.

Fey C. F., Denison D. R. (2003). Organizational Culture and Effectiveness: Can American Theory Be Applied in Russia? The William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan Business School, William Davidson Institute Working Paper, 598, July, 57-66.

Hatch M. J., Schultz M., Skov A. (2015). Organizational Identity and Culture in the Context of Managed Change: Transformation in the Carlsberg Group, 2009-2013. Academy of Management Discoveries, June, 1, 58-90.

Heinickea A., Guenthera T. W., Widenerb S. K. (2016). An examination of the relationship between the extent of a flexible culture and the levers of control system: The key role of beliefs control. Management Accounting Research, 33, 25-41.

Leonardi P. M. (2011). Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts. Organization Science, 22 (2), 347-369.

Mintzberg H. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations. Prentice-Hall, 1983.

Pacanovski M., O’Donnell-Trujillo N. (1982). Communication and Organization Culture. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 115-130.

Pfister J. A. (2009). Managing Organizational Culture for Effective Internal Control. From Practice to Theory (Contributions to Management Science). Springer Phisica-Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg. 245 p.

Schein E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership. 3rd ed. Jossey-Bass. 437 p.

Skarzhinskaia E. M., Tsurikov V. I. (2014). On the effectiveness of collective action. Russian Management Journal, 12 (3), 87-106 (in Russian).

Zheng W., Yang B., McLean G. N. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63, 763-771.

Published
2020/04/02
Section
Original Scientific Paper