E-business capabilities and innovation performance: The mediating effect of knowledge management strategies
The aim of this paper is to analyze the mediating effect of the knowledge management strategies on the relationship between e-business capabilities and innovation performance. The research model was tested with a sample of 102 firms belonging to IT intensive sectors, located in an emerging country that is a regional leader in terms of e-business adoption. Structural equations by the consistent partial least squares method were used. The main result indicates that only the personalization strategy has a partial mediating effect. In conclusion, e-business capability alone is insufficient for achieving a superior innovation performance. This finding also helps consolidate the incipient study perspective that understands knowledge management not as an antecedent variable which becomes indispensable for e-business adoption, but as an organizational factor that intervenes a posteriori and which is focused on achieving an effective use of all the knowledge resulting from the digital operation of the business.
Afuah, A. (2003). Innovation management: strategies, implementation and profits. In Oxford University Press.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D.E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25 (1), 107–136.
Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., & Chiva, R. (2006). A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (4), 333–346.
Ash, C.G., & Burn, J.M. (2003). A strategic framework for the management of ERP enabled e-business change. European Journal of Operational Research, 146 (2), 374–387.
Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A.B., & Yin, F. (2004). An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly, 28 (4), 585–620.
Bianchi, M., Croce, A., Dell’Era, C., Di Benedetto, C.A., & Frattini, F. (2016). Organizing for Inbound Open Innovation: How External Consultants and a Dedicated R&D Unit Influence Product Innovation Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33 (4), 492–510.
Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open innovation: Research, practices, and policies. California Management Review, 60 (2), 5–16.
Braga, A., Marques, C.S., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2018). Internationalisation strategy of knowledge-intensive business services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9 (2), 359–377.
Buenechea-Elberdin, M., Sáenz, J., & Kianto, A. (2018). Knowledge management strategies, intellectual capital, and innovation performance: a comparison between high- and low-tech firms. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22 (8), 1757–1781.
Cegarra-Navarro, J.G., Jiménez, D.J., & Martínez-Conesa, E.Á. (2007). Implementing e-business through organizational learning: An empirical investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 27 (3), 173–186.
Chae, H.-C., Koh, C.E., & Prybutok, V.R. (2014). Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Contradictory Findings and Their Possible Causes. MIS Quaterly, 38 (1), 305–326.
Chen, C.-J., & Huang, J.-W. (2009). Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance — The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of Business Research, 62 (1), 104–114.
Chen, Y., Wang, Y., Nevo, S., Benitez-Amado, J., & Kou, G. (2015). IT capabilities and product innovation performance: The roles of corporate entrepreneurship and competitive intensity. Information & Management, 52 (6), 643–657.
Chi, M., Zhao, J., Lu, Z., & Liu, Z. (2010). Analysis of E-business capabilities and performance: From e-SCM process view. 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Information Technology, Chengdu, 1, 18–22.
Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40 (5), 403–417.
Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J.G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega, 36 (2), 235–251.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). In Statistical Power Anlysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA.
Dalla Pozza, I., Goetz, O., & Sahut, J.M. (2018). Implementation effects in the relationship between CRM and its performance. Journal of Business Research, 89, 391–403.
DANE. (2016). Indicators of information and communication technology use in colombian companies. Retrieved from http://www.dane.gov.co/files/investigaciones/boletines/tic/bol_empresas_2014def.pdf.
Dijkstra, T.K., & Henseler, J. (2015). Consistent Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 39 (2), 297–316.
Duan, Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Management Decision, 48 (6), 849–867.
Erwee, R., Skadiang, B., & Roxas, B. (2012). Knowledge management culture, strategy and process in Malaysian firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10 (1), 89–98.
Fahey, L., Srivastava, R., Sharon, J.S., & Smith, D.E. (2001). Linking e-business and operating processes: The role of knowledge management. IBM Systems Journal, 40 (4), 889–907.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.
Garcia-Muina, F.E., Pelechano-Barahona, E., & Navas-Lopez, J.E. (2007). Knowledge Codification and Technological Innovation Success: Empirical Evidence from Spanish Biotech Companies. PICMET '07 - 2007 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology, Portland, OR, 1062-1071.
Grant, R.M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7 (4), 375–387.
Gregory, G.D., Ngo, L.V., & Karavdic, M. (2017). Developing e-commerce marketing capabilities and efficiencies for enhanced performance in business-to-business export ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 78, 146-157.
Hair Jr, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Hansen, M.T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77 (2), 106–116.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43 (1), 115–135.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R.R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & G. Pervez (Eds.), New Challenges to International Marketing, 20, 277–319.
Hofstede, G. (1983). National Cultures in Four Dimensions: A Research-Based Theory of Cultural Differences among Nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13 (1–2), 46–74.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88–115.
Imran, M.K., Rehman, C.A., Aslam, U., Bilal, A R., & Aslam, U. (2016). What’s organization knowledge management strategy for successful change implementation? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29 (7), 1097–1117.
Jiang, X., & Li, Y. (2009). An empirical investigation of knowledge management and innovative performance: The case of alliances. Research Policy, 38 (2), 358–368.
Johnson, M.E., & Whang, S. (2002). E-business and supply chain management: an overview and framework. Production and Operations Management, 11 (4), 413–423.
Kazadi, K., Lievens, A., & Mahr, D. (2016). Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders. Journal of Business Research, 69 (2), 525–540.
Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R.V., & Cockburn, I. (2012). Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity. Information Systems Research, 23 (1), 42–59.
Koellinger, P. (2008). The relationship between technology, innovation, and firm performance—Empirical evidence from e-business in Europe. Research Policy, 37 (8), 1317–1328.
Kroh, J., Luetjen, H., Globocnik, D., & Schultz, C. (2018). Use and Efficacy of Information Technology in Innovation Processes: The Specific Role of Servitization. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35 (5), 720–741.
Lai, Y.-L., Hsu, M.-S., Lin, F.-J., Chen, Y.-M., & Lin, Y.-H. (2014). The effects of industry cluster knowledge management on innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 67 (5), 734–739.
Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (1), 179–228.
Lee, C., Lee, G., & Lin, H. (2007). The role of organizational capabilities in successful e-business implementation. Business Process Management Journal, 13 (5), 677–693.
Lee, G., & Lin, H. (2005). Impact of organizational learning and knowledge management factors on e-business adoption. Management Decision, 43 (2), 171–188.
Liao, Y. (2011). The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance. International Journal of Manpower, 32 (5/6), 494–511.
Yee-Loong Chong, A., Ooi, K.-B., Bao, H., & Lin, B. (2014). Can e-business adoption be influenced by knowledge management? An empirical analysis of Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18 (1), 121–136.
Lin, L.-M., & Hsia, T.-L. (2011). Core capabilities for practitioners in achieving e-business innovation. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1884–1891.
López-Nicolás, C., & Meroño-Cerdán, Á. (2011). Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. International Journal of Information Management, 31 (6), 502–509.
Mitrović, Z., Obradović, V., & Suknović, M. (2018). Knowledge management in the public sector: The case of Serbian local government. Serbian Journal of Management, 13 (2), 293–309.
Moodley, S. (2003). The challenge of e-business for the South African apparel sector. Technovation, 23 (7), 557–570.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5 (1), 14–37.
Nonaka, I., & von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit Knowledge and Knowledge Conversion: Controversy and Advancement in Organizational Knowledge Creation Theory. Organization Science, 20 (3), 635–652.
Parida, V., & Örtqvist, D. (2015). Interactive Effects of Network Capability, ICT Capability, and Financial Slack on Technology-Based Small Firm Innovation Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (S1), 278–298.
Pellegrini, L., & Martini, A. (2005). Barriers and levers towards knowledge management configurations: A case study-based approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16 (6), 670–681.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.
Popa, S., Soto-Acosta, P., & Perez-Gonzalez, D. (2018). An investigation of the effect of electronic business on financial performance of Spanish manufacturing SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 355–362.
Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40 (3), 879–891.
Sok, P., & O’Cass, A. (2011). Achieving superior innovation-based performance outcomes in SMEs through innovation resource–capability complementarity. Industrial Marketing Management, 40 (8), 1285–1293.
Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22 (6), 885–904.
Storey, C., & Kahn, K.B. (2010). The Role of Knowledge Management Strategies and Task Knowledge in Stimulating Service Innovation. Journal of Service Research, 13 (4), 397–410.
Sumbal, M.S., Tsui, E., & See-to, E.W.K. (2017). Interrelationship between big data and knowledge management: an exploratory study in the oil and gas sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21 (1), 180–196.
Terziovski, M., & Guerrero, J.-L. (2014). ISO 9000 quality system certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 158 (C), 197–207.
Urbinati, A., Bogers, M., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2019). Creating and capturing value from Big Data: A multiple-case study analysis of provider companies. Technovation, 84–85, 21–36.
Van der Vorst, J.G.A.J., Van Dongen, S., Nouguier, S., & Hilhorst, R. (2002). E-business Initiatives in Food Supply Chains; Definition and Typology of Electronic Business Models. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 5 (2), 119–138.
Venkitachalam, K., & Willmott, H. (2017). Strategic knowledge management—Insights and pitfalls. International Journal of Information Management, 37 (4), 313–316.
Veselovská, L., Kožarova, M., & Zavadsky, J. (2018). Relationship between information sharing and flexibility in management of enterprises in automotive industry: An empirical study. Serbian Journal of Management, 13 (2), 381–393.
West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31 (4), 814–831.
World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Information Technology Report 2016: Innovating in the Digital Economy. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf
Zhao, J., Huang, W. V., & Zhu, Z. (2008). An Empirical Study of E-Business Implementation Process in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55 (1), 134–147.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J.G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. Zhu, Z., Zhao, J., Tang, X., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Leveraging e-business process for business value: A layered structure perspective. Information & Management, 52(6), 679–691.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.