Business Strategies in Unstable Institutional Environment – Case of BRIC Countries

  • Branko Rakita Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragan Azdejković Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dušan Marković Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, Serbia
Keywords: institutions, Institutional Environment, GLOBALIZATION, Business Strategy, BRIC,

Abstract


The visionary idea of BRIC 

countries and their leading position in the development of global economy, conceived by the leading investment bank Goldman Sachs more than a decade ago, came under heavy skepticism. However, what many doubted came true. At the end of 2011 BRIC countries generated approximately 26% of global GDP, and their share in the growth of global GDP was more than 50%. The impressive growth of BRIC countries has been in large measure due to FDI inflow. Intensive FDI inflow and economic development have not been followed by improved institutional efficiency. This article will show that inefficient institutions in BRIC countries have not been discouraging to MNCs, who were predominantly led by the extent and the growth dynamics of the market. Modifications to business strategies applied in developed countries by MNCs, in order to manage unstable institutional environment in BRIC countries, will be analyzed. The conclusion is that the key modification is establishment of strong relationships with local stakeholders, in order for MNCs to gain necessary knowledge of the new business environment and create a sound basis for institutional efficiency improvement.

Author Biography

Branko Rakita, Faculty of Economics, Belgrade, Serbia

Katedra za poslovnu ekonomiju i menadžment

Asistent na predmetima

Međunarodni marketing i Međunarodnih menadžment

References

Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Barney, J., & Tong, W.T. (2006). Building versus Acquiring Resources. Pp. 57-81 in A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, D. Galler & H. Viney (editors), Strategy and Performance Achieving Competitive Advantage in the Global Marketplace, London, UK, Middlesex University Business School.

Benassy, Q.A., Maylis, C., & Thierry, M. (2007). Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. The World Economy, 30(5), 764-782.

Chen, T-J., Chen, H., & Ku, Y-H. (2004). Foreign Direct Investments and Local Linkages. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4), 320-333.

Hitt, M.A., Ahlstrom, D., Dacin, M.T., Levitas, E., & Svobodina, L. (2004). The Institutional Effects on Strategic Alliance Partner Selection in Transition Economics: China vs Russia. Organization Science, 15(2), 173-185.

Hitt, M., Ireland, D., & Santoro, M. (2006). Developing and Managing Strategic Alliances, Building Social Capital and Creating Value. Pp. 13-34 in A. Ghobadian, N. O’Regan, D. Galler & H. Viney (editors), Strategy and Performance Achieving Competitive Advantage in the Global Marketplace, London, UK, Middlesex University Business School.

Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C.M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249-267.

Iankova, E., & Katz, J. (2003). Strategies for Political Risk Mediation by International Firms in Transition Economies: The Case of Bulgaria, Journal of World Business. 38(3), 182-203.

Jovičić, M., & Dragutinović, M.R. (2011). Econometrics methods and models. Belgrade, Serbia, Faculty of Economics. (In Serbian)

Khanna, T., & Palepu, G.K. (1997). Why Focused Strategies May be Wrong for Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41-51.

Khanna, T., Palepu, G.K., & Sinha J. (2005). Strategies That Fit Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63-77.

Kwok, C.C.Y., & Tadesse, S.A. (2006). The MNC as an Agent of Change for Host-Country Institutions: FDI and Corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 767-785.

Meyer, K.E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S.K., & Peng. M.W. (2009). Institutions, Resources and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61-80.

Mladenović, Z., & Nojković, A. (2012). Applied Time Series Analysis. Belgrade, Serbia, Faculty of Economics. (In Serbian)

Peng, W.M., & Khoury, T. (2008). Unbundling the Institution Base View of International Business Strategy. In Pp. 256-268 A. M. Rugman (editor), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, NY, USA, Oxford University Press.

Peng, W.M., Sunny, L.S., Pinkham, B., & Chen, H. (2009). The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. Academy of Management Perspective, 23(3), 63-81.

Peng, W.M., Wang, D.Y.L., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An Institution-Based View of International Business Strategy: A Focus on Emerging Economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 920-936.

Porter, E.M. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 79-93.

Puffer, S., & McCarthy, D. (2007). Can Russia's State Managed, Network Capitalism be Competitive? Institution Pull versus Institution Push. Journal of World Business, 42(1), 1-13.

Sims, A.C. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1-48.

Stata Corp LP. (2011). Time-Series Reference Manual. College Station, Texas, USA Stata Press.

Stefanović, I., Ranković, Lj., Prokić, S. (2011). Entrepreneurs Motivational Factors: Empirical Evidence from Serbia. Serbian Journal of Management, 6(1), 73-83.

Tetsufumi, Y., Swarnali, A., & Kelston, A. (2009). The BRICs as Driver of Global Consumpiton. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper, 09(07), 1-4.

Verbeke, A. (2009). International Business Strategy. NY, USA, Cambridge University Press.

www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html

http://databank.worldbank.org/ddp/home.do

http://unctadstat.unctad.org/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx

http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/sc_country.asp

Supplementary files
Published
2012/10/08
Section
Original Scientific Paper