Are the self-employed at a higher poverty risk: empirical evidence from Serbian silc data
Abstract
Self-employment constitutes a significant share of the workforce in Serbia. Due to the equally high poverty as well as self-employment rates in Serbia, this paper aims to examine whether there is any prevalence between the two. Moreover, it also seeks to investigate what detriments exist within self-employment that keep or lead to poverty among self-employed people. The research is based on both longitudinal and cross-sectional SILC data. The main results indicated higher poverty exposure for solo entrepreneurs and those employed in family enterprises. Businesses run by men, low-skilled individuals, and young entrepreneurs are all at a much higher risk of poverty than other entrepreneurs or employees, especially those represented by women and highly educated individuals. The paper provides significant inputs for (1) managing differences within the active population at risk of income poverty and (2) monitoring outcomes of the self-employed, given that more than half of them are involved in the agricultural sector.
References
Adamczyk, A., Neneman, J., & Morawski, L. (2018). Why do We Need Self-Employed Persons? Some Economic Reflections, Mainly Tax Related Ones. Center for Social and Economic Research. CASE Research Paper No. 159.
Albulescu, C. T., & Drăghici. A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and national innovative capacity in selected European countries. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 17 (3), 155-172.
Andrić, V., & Minović, J. (2018). Public debt growth, great recession and fiscal consolidation: The Serbian episode. Serbian Journal of Management, 13 (2), 251-262.
Angel, S., Heuberger, R., & Lamei, N. (2018). Differences between household income from surveys and registers and how these affect the poverty headcount: evidence from the Austrian SILC. Social Indicators Research, 138, 575–603.
Astebro, T., & Chen, J. (2014). The entrepreneurial earnings puzzle: mismeasurement or real? Journal of Business Venturing, 29 (1), 88-105.
Banerjee, S., & Goswami, K. (2020). Self-employed or paid employed: Who can earn more among the slum dwellers and why? Progress in Development Studies, 20 (1), 7-25.
Blanchflower, D. G. (2000). Self-employment in OECD countries. Labour Economics, 7, 471–505.
Bradshaw, J., Bennett, F., & Mayhew, E. (2010). In-Work Poverty and Labour Market Segmentation: A Study of National Policies, United Kingdom. European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Social Affairs and Inclusion.
Brandolini, A., & Rosolia, A. (2017). The Euro area wage distribution over the crisis. In Anthony, A. B., Guio, A.-C., & Marlier E. (Eds.), Monitoring social inclusion in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 317-332.
Branyiczki, R. (2015). Employment, Education and Other Means of Reducing Poverty. European Commission. EC Research Note No. 4. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=15126&langId=en
Caliendo, M., & Kunn, S. (2011). Start-up subsidies for the unemployed: Long-term effectiveness and effect heterogeneity. Journal of Public Economics, 95 (3-4), 311-331.
Cappellari, L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2004). Modelling low income transitions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19 (5), 593–610.
Crettaz, E. (2011). Fighting working poverty in post-industrial economies: Causes trade-offs and policy solutions. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.
Eurofound. (2017). Exploring self-employment in the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Eurostat. (2017). Methodological guidelines and description of EU SILC target variables: DocSILC065 (2017 operation). Available at https://circabc.europa.eu/webdav/CircaBC/ESTAT/eusilc/Library/guidelines_questionnaire/2017%20Oparation%20Guidelines/DOCSILC065%20operation%202017-%2022-05-2017.pdf
Fritsch, M., Sorgner, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Self-Employment and Well-Being Across Institutional Contexts. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2018-005.
Fritsch, M., Sorgner, A., & Wyrwich, M. (2019). Self-employment and well-being across institutional contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 34 (6), 105946.
Goerne, A. (2011). A Comparative analysis of in-work poverty in the European Union. Fraser, N., Gutiérrez, R., & Peña-Casaan, R. (Eds.), Working poverty in Europe: A comparative approach. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke. 15–45.
Halleröd, B., Ekbrand, H., & Bengtsson M. (2015). In-work poverty and labour market trajectories: Poverty risks among the working population in 22 European countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 25 (5), 473-488.
Horemans, J., & Marx, I. (2017). Poverty and material deprivation among the self-employed in Europe: An exploration of a relatively uncharted landscape. Institute of Labor Economics. IZA Discussion Paper No. 11007.
ILO. (2016). Non-standard employment around the world: understanding challenges, shaping prospects. International Labor Organization. Geneva.
Lohmann, H., & Marx, I. (2008). The different faces of in-work poverty across welfare state regimes. Andreß, H.-J., & Lohmann H. (Eds.), The working poor in Europe: Employment, poverty and globalisation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. 17–46.
McKnight, A., Stewart, K., Himmelweit, S.M., & Palillo, M. (2016). Low pay and in-work poverty: preventative measures and preventative approaches. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Mijatović, B. (2017). Monitoring of social inclusion in the Republic of Serbia - Indicators of financial poverty and inequality. Team for social inclusion and poverty reduction of the Government of the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade. (in Serbian).
Mussida, C., & Parisi, M. L. (2020). Risk of poverty in Southern Europe. Metroeconomica, 71, 294–315.
National Bank of the Republic of Serbia. (2021). Available at https://nbs.rs/sr_RS/drugi-nivo-navigacije/statistika/
OECD & European Union. (2017). The missing entrepreneurs 2017: Policies for inclusive entrepreneurs. OECD Publishing, Paris.
Ognjenović, K., & Pavlović, D. (2021). SILC in the Republic of Serbia: methodological framework and analysis of selected indicators of poverty and inequality (in Serbian). Institute of Economic Sciences & Team for Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction of the Government of the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade.
Peña-Casas, R., Ghailani, D., Spasova, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2019). In-work poverty in Europe A study of national policies. European Commission. European Social Policy Network (ESPN). Available at https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=21240&langId=en
Piccarozzi, M., Aquilani, B., & Gatti, C. (2018). Industry 4.0 in management studies: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 10 (10), 3821.
Ponthieux, S. (2010). Assessing and analysing in-work poverty risk. Pp. 307-328 in A.B. Anthony & E. Marlier (Eds.), Income and living conditions in Europe. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
Rajh, E., Budak, J., Ateljević, J., Davčev, L., Jovanov, T., & Ognjenović, K. (2016). Entrepreneurial intentions in selected Southeast European countries. The Institute of Economics. EIZ Working Paper No. 1609.
Rajh, E., Jovanov Apasieva, T., Budak, J., Ateljević, J., Davčev, Lj., & Ognjenović, K. (2018). Youth and entrepreneurial intentions in four South-East European countries. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 16 (3), 355-382.
Ray, K., Sissons, P., Jones, K., & Vegeris, S. (2014). Employment, pay and poverty: Evidence and policy review. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. York.
Sánchez-Sellero, M. C., & Garcia-Carro, B. (2020). Which Groups have a greater risk of poverty in Spain? Revija za socijalnu politiku, 27 (1), 19-36.
SIPRU. (2020). Absolute poverty. Available at http://socijalnoukljucivanje.gov.rs/rs/socijalno-ukljucivanje-u-rs/statistika-siromastva/apsolutno-siromastvo/
Spasova, S., Ghailani, D., Sabato, S., Coster, S., Fronteddu, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2021). Non-standard workers and the self-employed in the EU: social protection during the Covid-19 pandemic. Mimeo, European Union Trade Institute (ETUI). Available at https://etui.org/publications/non-standard-workers-and-self-employed-eu
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2020). Database: Labor Force Survey. Available at https://data.stat.gov.rs/?caller=SDDB
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia (2021). Database: SILC. Available at https://data.stat.gov.rs/?caller=SDDB
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. (2015-2017). Database: Survey on Income and Living Conditions-SILC. Available at https://data.stat.gov.rs/?languageCode=en-US
Törmälehto, V. M. (2017). High income and affluence: evidence from the European Union statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). Publications Office of the European Union., Luxembourg.
Vrchota, J., & Rehor, P. (2021). Project management in manufacturing enterprises. Serbian Journal of Management, 16 (2), 341-353.
Wooldridge, J. (2006). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA, USA.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.