Empowering lead users: Kenya's three-part formula for fintech innovation success
Abstract
Lead user innovation is one of the key factors which define new product development and market success, but the characteristics of user innovators in emerging markets are still not explored enough. This research aims at finding out the effect of work experience, autonomy and number of partners in innovation on success of lead user innovation in Kenya’s Fintech industry. The quantitative data was collected through a survey of 321 lead user innovators while qualitative data was collected through 36 in-depth interviews. This analysis demonstrates that work experience has an influence on success through innovation partners and indirectly through the work experience, which has an influence on success directly through autonomy but has no indirect impact on success through partners. Thus, the study adds to the body of literature on user innovation by identifying factors that are essential for success in an emerging market and by providing recommendations for organizations that encourage user-driven innovation. The emphasis on the Kenyan fintech segment and the consideration of the mediating roles of innovation partners contribute to the novelty of innovation research. The results also highlighted the fact that the key factors influencing lead user innovation success are work experience, autonomy, and collaboration.
References
Agarwal, N., Chakrabarti, R., Brem, A., & Bocken, N. (2018). Market driving at Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP): An analysis of social enterprises from the healthcare sector. Journal of Business Research, 86, 234-244.
Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity." Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Benlian, A., & Hess, T. (2011). Opportunities and risks of software-as-a-service: Findings from a survey of IT executives. Decision Support Systems, 52 (1), 232-246.
Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36 (4), 857-875.
Bohnsack, R., & Pinkse, J. (2017). Value propositions for disruptive technologies: Reconfiguration tactics in the case of electric vehicles. California Management Review, 59 (4), 79-96.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
Chatterji, A.K., & Fabrizio, K.R. (2014). Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation?. Strategic Management Journal, 35 (10), 1427-1445.
Chirchietti, V. (2021). Inclusive innovation and the role of partnerships: The case of M-Pesa. Industry and Innovation, 28 (6), 743-770.
Cochran, W.G. (1963). Sampling techniques (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41 (4), 1149-1160.
Faullant, R., Schwarz, E. J., Krajger, I., & Breitenecker, R.J. (2012). Towards a comprehensive understanding of lead userness: The search for individual creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21 (1), 76-92.
Figueiredo, P.N., & De Pretto, D. (2021). Building innovation capabilities by learning from R&D outsourcing: The 'shadow' effect of absorptive capacity. Technovation, 108, 102324.
Franke, N. & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities: Exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users? Research Policy, 32 (1), 157-178.
Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A lead user theory test Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (4), 301-315.
Green, S.B. (1991). How many subjects do it take to perform regression analysis? Multivariate Behavioral Research 26 (3), 499-510.
Griffin, A. and Page, A.L. (1996). PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13 (6), 478-496.
Hani, U., Arya, R., & Gupta, V. (2022). Innovation in emerging markets: A systematic review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research 139, 1141-1159.
Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a "low-tech" field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9 (3), 213-221.
Hienerth, C. & Lettl, C. (2017). Perspective: Understanding the nature and measurement of the lead user construct. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34 (1), 3-12.
Hyysalo, S. (2009). User innovation and everyday practices: Micro-innovation in sports industry development. R&D Management, 39 (3), 247-258.
Lettl, C., Herstatt, C., Gemuenden, H.G. (2006). User contributions to radical innovation: Evidence from four cases in the medical equipment technology field R&D Management, 36 (3), 251-272.
Lilien, G.L., Morrison, P.D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48 (8), 1042-1059.
Mahr, D., & Lievens, A. (2012). Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Research Policy 41 (1), 167-177.
Mihajlovic, I., Perišić, M., Spasojević - Brkić, V., Milošević, I., & Milijić, N. (2024). Digitalization of Strategic Decision-Making in Manufacturing SMEs: A Quantitative SWOT-TOWS Analysis. Precision Mechanics & Digital Fabrication 1 (3), 176 - 188.
Morikawa, M. (2021). Innovation in the service sector and the role of patents and trade secrets: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 59:101112.
Ndung'u, N., & Signé, L. (2020). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and digitization will transform Africa into a global powerhouse. Foresight Africa 2020, 61-73.
Ochieng, H. & Gichoya, D. (2021). Determinants of successful public sector information system implementation in Kenya: A case study. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 87 (5): e12176.
Onsongo, E. (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and social innovation at the base of the pyramid: The case of M-Pesa in Kenya. Industry and Innovation, 26 (4), 369-390.
Pohjosenperä, T., Kekkonen, P., Pekkarinen, S., & Juga, J. (2019). Service modularity in managing healthcare logistics. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30 (1), 174-194.
Ramdani, B., Binsaif, A., Boukrami, E. (2019). Business model innovation: A review and research agenda. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22 (2), 89-108.
Saldanha, T.J., Mithas, S., Krishnan, M.S. (2017). Leveraging customer involvement in fueling innovation: The role of relational and analytical information processing capabilities. MIS Quarterly 41 (1), 267-286.
Sauermann, H. (2018). Fire in the belly? Employee motives and innovative performance in startups versus established firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 12 (4), 423-454.
Schaarschmidt, M., Walsh, G., Evanschitzky, H. (2018). Customer interaction and innovation in hybrid offerings: Investigating moderation and mediation effects for goods and services innovation. Journal of Service Research 21 (1), 119-134.
Schreier, M., & Prügl, R. (2008). Extending lead-user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers' lead userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25 (4), 331-346.
Schuhmacher, M.C., & S. Kuester, (2012). Identification of lead user characteristics driving the quality of service innovation ideas. Creativity and Innovation Management 21 (4), 427-442.
Schweisfurth, T.G., Dharmawan, M.P. (2019). Does lead usage foster the implementation and diffusion of ideas? Study on Internal shop floor users. Research Policy, 48 (1), 289-297.
Schweisfurth, T.G., & Raasch, C. (2015). Embedded lead users: Benefits of employing users for corporate innovation. Research Policy 44 (1), 168-180.
Seo, H., Chung, Y., & Yoon, H.D. (2022). R&D team autonomy and innovation performance: Moderating the role of internal and external collaboration. Journal of Business Research, 139, 629-640.
Shin, N., Kraemer, K.L., Dedrick, J. (2020). R&D and firm performance in the semiconductor industry. Industry and Innovation, 27 (3), 302-323.
Smith, A. (2020). Inclusive innovation and the role of intermediaries: Insights from Kenya’s ‘Silicon Savannah. ’ Journal of International Development, 32 (6), 780-803.
Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (5), 1442-1465.
Stock, R.M., von Hippel, E., & Gillert, N.L. (2016). The impact of personality traits on consumer innovation success. Research Policy 45 (4), 757-769.
von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32 (7), 791-805.
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
von Hippel, E., Franke, N., & Prügl, R. (2009). "Pyramiding: Efficient search for rare subjects." Research Policy 38 (9), 1397-1406.
Zhu, H., Gardner, D. G., and Chen, H. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management 44 (5), 2094-2115.
The Author wishes to submit the Work to SJM for publication. To enable SJM to publish the Work and to give effect to the parties’ intention set forth herein, they have agreed to cede the first right to publication and republication in the SJM Journal.
Cession
The Author hereby cedes to SJM, who accepts the cession, to the copyright in and to the paper.
The purpose of the cession is to enable SJM to publish the Work, as first publisher world-wide, and for republication in the SJM Journal, and to grant the right to others to publish the Work world-wide, for so long as such copyright subsists;
SJM shall be entitled to edit the work before publication, as it deems fit, subject to the Authors approval
The Author warrants to SJM that:
- the Author is the owner of the copyright in the Work, whether as author or as reassigned from the Author’s employee and that the Author is entitled to cede the copyright to SJM;
- the paper (or any of its part) is not submitted or accepted for publication in any other Journal;
- the Work is an original work created by the Author;
- the Author has not transferred, ceded, or assigned the copyright, or any part thereof, to any third party; or granted any third party a licence or other right to the copyright, which may affect or detract from the rights granted to SJM in terms of this agreement.
The Author hereby indemnifies the SJM as a body and its individual members, to the fullest extent permitted in law, against all or any claims which may arise consequent to the warranties set forth.
No monetary consideration shall be payable by SJM to the Author for the cession, but SJM shall clearly identify the Author as having produced the Work and ensure that due recognition is given to the Author in any publication of the Work.
Should SJM, in its sole discretion, elect not to publish the Work within 1 year after the date of this agreement, the cession shall lapse and be of no further effect. In such event the copyright shall revert to the Author and SJM shall not publish the Work, or any part thereof, without the Author’s prior written consent.